Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration

Autores
Jackson, Robert B.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Avissar, Roni; Roy, Somnath Baidya; Barrett, Damian J.; Cook, Charles W.; Farley, Kathleen A.; le Maitre, David C.; McCarl, Bruce A.; Murray, Brian C.
Año de publicación
2005
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantations without considering their full environmental consequences. We combined field research, synthesis of more than 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and increased soil salinization and acidification, with afforestation. Plantations decreased stream flow by 227 millimeters per year globally (52%), with 13% of streams drying completely for at least 1 year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation scenarios suggests that climate feedbacks are unlikely to offset such water losses and could exacerbate them. Plantations can help control groundwater recharge and upwelling but reduce stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils.
Fil: Jackson, Robert B.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina
Fil: Avissar, Roni. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Roy, Somnath Baidya. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Barrett, Damian J.. Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation;
Fil: Cook, Charles W.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Farley, Kathleen A.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: le Maitre, David C.. Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation;
Fil: McCarl, Bruce A.. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Murray, Brian C.. Research Triangle Institute; Estados Unidos
Materia
CARBON
BIOLOGICAL CARBON
TRADING WATER
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/272962

id CONICETDig_3fa8592b0bd8396ff5e1bd213d25bc70
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/272962
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestrationJackson, Robert B.Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban GabrielAvissar, RoniRoy, Somnath BaidyaBarrett, Damian J.Cook, Charles W.Farley, Kathleen A.le Maitre, David C.McCarl, Bruce A.Murray, Brian C.CARBONBIOLOGICAL CARBONTRADING WATERhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantations without considering their full environmental consequences. We combined field research, synthesis of more than 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and increased soil salinization and acidification, with afforestation. Plantations decreased stream flow by 227 millimeters per year globally (52%), with 13% of streams drying completely for at least 1 year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation scenarios suggests that climate feedbacks are unlikely to offset such water losses and could exacerbate them. Plantations can help control groundwater recharge and upwelling but reduce stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils.Fil: Jackson, Robert B.. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; ArgentinaFil: Avissar, Roni. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: Roy, Somnath Baidya. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: Barrett, Damian J.. Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation;Fil: Cook, Charles W.. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: Farley, Kathleen A.. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: le Maitre, David C.. Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation;Fil: McCarl, Bruce A.. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Murray, Brian C.. Research Triangle Institute; Estados UnidosAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science2005-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/272962Jackson, Robert B.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Avissar, Roni; Roy, Somnath Baidya; Barrett, Damian J.; et al.; Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration; American Association for the Advancement of Science; Science; 310; 5756; 12-2005; 1944-19470036-8075CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1119282info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1126/science.1119282info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:36:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/272962instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:36:51.187CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
title Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
spellingShingle Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
Jackson, Robert B.
CARBON
BIOLOGICAL CARBON
TRADING WATER
title_short Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
title_full Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
title_fullStr Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
title_full_unstemmed Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
title_sort Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Jackson, Robert B.
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Avissar, Roni
Roy, Somnath Baidya
Barrett, Damian J.
Cook, Charles W.
Farley, Kathleen A.
le Maitre, David C.
McCarl, Bruce A.
Murray, Brian C.
author Jackson, Robert B.
author_facet Jackson, Robert B.
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Avissar, Roni
Roy, Somnath Baidya
Barrett, Damian J.
Cook, Charles W.
Farley, Kathleen A.
le Maitre, David C.
McCarl, Bruce A.
Murray, Brian C.
author_role author
author2 Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Avissar, Roni
Roy, Somnath Baidya
Barrett, Damian J.
Cook, Charles W.
Farley, Kathleen A.
le Maitre, David C.
McCarl, Bruce A.
Murray, Brian C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CARBON
BIOLOGICAL CARBON
TRADING WATER
topic CARBON
BIOLOGICAL CARBON
TRADING WATER
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantations without considering their full environmental consequences. We combined field research, synthesis of more than 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and increased soil salinization and acidification, with afforestation. Plantations decreased stream flow by 227 millimeters per year globally (52%), with 13% of streams drying completely for at least 1 year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation scenarios suggests that climate feedbacks are unlikely to offset such water losses and could exacerbate them. Plantations can help control groundwater recharge and upwelling but reduce stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils.
Fil: Jackson, Robert B.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina
Fil: Avissar, Roni. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Roy, Somnath Baidya. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Barrett, Damian J.. Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation;
Fil: Cook, Charles W.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Farley, Kathleen A.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: le Maitre, David C.. Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation;
Fil: McCarl, Bruce A.. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Murray, Brian C.. Research Triangle Institute; Estados Unidos
description Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantations without considering their full environmental consequences. We combined field research, synthesis of more than 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and increased soil salinization and acidification, with afforestation. Plantations decreased stream flow by 227 millimeters per year globally (52%), with 13% of streams drying completely for at least 1 year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation scenarios suggests that climate feedbacks are unlikely to offset such water losses and could exacerbate them. Plantations can help control groundwater recharge and upwelling but reduce stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/272962
Jackson, Robert B.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Avissar, Roni; Roy, Somnath Baidya; Barrett, Damian J.; et al.; Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration; American Association for the Advancement of Science; Science; 310; 5756; 12-2005; 1944-1947
0036-8075
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/272962
identifier_str_mv Jackson, Robert B.; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Avissar, Roni; Roy, Somnath Baidya; Barrett, Damian J.; et al.; Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration; American Association for the Advancement of Science; Science; 310; 5756; 12-2005; 1944-1947
0036-8075
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1119282
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1126/science.1119282
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Association for the Advancement of Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Association for the Advancement of Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082837171666944
score 13.22299