Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process

Autores
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream.
Fil: Laoretani, Daniela Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina
Fil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina
Materia
Soapstock
Gossypol
Process Optimizationa
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/6894

id CONICETDig_3e3633ccacb8f9ed9fdd32d76b97817c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/6894
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production processLaoretani, Daniela SoledadIribarren, Oscar AlbertoSoapstockGossypolProcess Optimizationahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream.Fil: Laoretani, Daniela Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); ArgentinaFil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); ArgentinaElsevier2015-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/6894Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process; Elsevier; Chemical Engineering Research & Design; 100; 5-2015; 135-1470263-8762enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876215001689info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.05.017info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:19Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/6894instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:19.356CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
title Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
spellingShingle Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad
Soapstock
Gossypol
Process Optimizationa
title_short Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
title_full Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
title_fullStr Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
title_full_unstemmed Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
title_sort Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Laoretani, Daniela Soledad
Iribarren, Oscar Alberto
author Laoretani, Daniela Soledad
author_facet Laoretani, Daniela Soledad
Iribarren, Oscar Alberto
author_role author
author2 Iribarren, Oscar Alberto
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Soapstock
Gossypol
Process Optimizationa
topic Soapstock
Gossypol
Process Optimizationa
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream.
Fil: Laoretani, Daniela Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina
Fil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina
description Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/6894
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process; Elsevier; Chemical Engineering Research & Design; 100; 5-2015; 135-147
0263-8762
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/6894
identifier_str_mv Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process; Elsevier; Chemical Engineering Research & Design; 100; 5-2015; 135-147
0263-8762
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876215001689
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.05.017
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269087420383232
score 13.13397