Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process
- Autores
- Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream.
Fil: Laoretani, Daniela Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina
Fil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina - Materia
-
Soapstock
Gossypol
Process Optimizationa - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/6894
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3e3633ccacb8f9ed9fdd32d76b97817c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/6894 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production processLaoretani, Daniela SoledadIribarren, Oscar AlbertoSoapstockGossypolProcess Optimizationahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream.Fil: Laoretani, Daniela Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); ArgentinaFil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); ArgentinaElsevier2015-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/6894Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process; Elsevier; Chemical Engineering Research & Design; 100; 5-2015; 135-1470263-8762enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876215001689info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.05.017info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:19Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/6894instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:19.356CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process |
title |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process |
spellingShingle |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process Laoretani, Daniela Soledad Soapstock Gossypol Process Optimizationa |
title_short |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process |
title_full |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process |
title_fullStr |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process |
title_sort |
Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad Iribarren, Oscar Alberto |
author |
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad |
author_facet |
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad Iribarren, Oscar Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Iribarren, Oscar Alberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Soapstock Gossypol Process Optimizationa |
topic |
Soapstock Gossypol Process Optimizationa |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream. Fil: Laoretani, Daniela Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina Fil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño (i); Argentina |
description |
Three processes to obtain GAA from the soapstock residue of oil refineries were compared inthis work. The first process is the originally proposed by Dowd and Pelitire (2001. Ind. CropsProd. 14, 113) in which the mother liquor from the last crystallization step still containsan appreciable amount of gossypol which is lost as a process residual stream. The secondprocess recycles the mother liquor to the hydrolysis first step of the process, following theheuristic of the traditional process design procedure by Douglas (1988. Conceptual Design ofChemical Processes. McGraw Hill, New York, NY), which increases product yield. While thethird process adds a new downstream processing line to reprocess the mother liquor. Thislast alternative renders a slightly lower product yield than Process 2 but requires a smallerinvestment cost, exhibiting the best economic performance.The alternative of incorporating a recycle to reprocess unreacted material (in this casethe bound gossypol present in the crystallization mother liquor) is the usual approach intraditional process design. However, in this particular study case, it does not succeed inrendering the process alternative with the best economic performance: the recycle streamflow impacts on the equipment sizes, increasing investment cost far beyond the alternativethat adds smaller units to reprocess the mother liquor stream. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/6894 Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process; Elsevier; Chemical Engineering Research & Design; 100; 5-2015; 135-147 0263-8762 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/6894 |
identifier_str_mv |
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Recycling vs. reprocessing. Optimization of agossypol production process; Elsevier; Chemical Engineering Research & Design; 100; 5-2015; 135-147 0263-8762 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876215001689 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.05.017 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269087420383232 |
score |
13.13397 |