Quality and Quantity Revisited

Autores
Piovani, Juan Ignacio; Beigel, Maria Fernanda
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper attempts to discuss the qualitative methodological approach of Jack Katz in itshistorical framework of production. In doing so, we aim to analyze the actual relevance of thesediscussions and their impact in the qualitative-quantitative dilemma. Revisiting Katz´s ideas andcomplementing them with some critical remarks about the limits, misuses and biases of the four R (representativeness, reactivity, reliability and replicability) in quantitative research implies asignificant contribution to the understanding of qualitative research?s value in its own terms. Inmany ways, Katz?s methodological ideas anticipate later developments.
Cet article a pour objectif de discuter l'approche méthodologique qualitative de Jack Katz dans son cadre historique de production. Ce faisant, nous cherchons à analyser la pertinence réelle de ces discussions et leurs impacts dans le dilemme « qualitatif et quantitatif ». Le réexamen des idées de Katz (que viendront compléter quelques remarques critiques sur les limites, les mésusages et les préjugés liés aux 4R (représentativité, réactivité, fiabilité, reproductibilité) dans la recherche quantitative) engage une contribution importante à la compréhension de la valeur de la recherche qualitative dans ses propres termes. À bien des égards, les idées méthodologiques de Katz anticipent les évolutions postérieures.
Fil: Piovani, Juan Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Beigel, Maria Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo; Argentina
Materia
Reactivity
Reliability
Quantity
Quality
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/41051

id CONICETDig_3656b8d6c2944245c21861e665b432f3
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/41051
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Quality and Quantity RevisitedPiovani, Juan IgnacioBeigel, Maria FernandaReactivityReliabilityQuantityQualityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This paper attempts to discuss the qualitative methodological approach of Jack Katz in itshistorical framework of production. In doing so, we aim to analyze the actual relevance of thesediscussions and their impact in the qualitative-quantitative dilemma. Revisiting Katz´s ideas andcomplementing them with some critical remarks about the limits, misuses and biases of the four R (representativeness, reactivity, reliability and replicability) in quantitative research implies asignificant contribution to the understanding of qualitative research?s value in its own terms. Inmany ways, Katz?s methodological ideas anticipate later developments.Cet article a pour objectif de discuter l'approche méthodologique qualitative de Jack Katz dans son cadre historique de production. Ce faisant, nous cherchons à analyser la pertinence réelle de ces discussions et leurs impacts dans le dilemme « qualitatif et quantitatif ». Le réexamen des idées de Katz (que viendront compléter quelques remarques critiques sur les limites, les mésusages et les préjugés liés aux 4R (représentativité, réactivité, fiabilité, reproductibilité) dans la recherche quantitative) engage une contribution importante à la compréhension de la valeur de la recherche qualitative dans ses propres termes. À bien des égards, les idées méthodologiques de Katz anticipent les évolutions postérieures.Fil: Piovani, Juan Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Beigel, Maria Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo; ArgentinaROUTLEDGE2015-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/41051Piovani, Juan Ignacio; Beigel, Maria Fernanda; Quality and Quantity Revisited; ROUTLEDGE; Methods; I; 1-2; 6-2015; 163-1682375-47452375-4753CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/23754745.2015.1017290info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23754745.2015.1017290info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:41:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/41051instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:41:48.058CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality and Quantity Revisited
title Quality and Quantity Revisited
spellingShingle Quality and Quantity Revisited
Piovani, Juan Ignacio
Reactivity
Reliability
Quantity
Quality
title_short Quality and Quantity Revisited
title_full Quality and Quantity Revisited
title_fullStr Quality and Quantity Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Quality and Quantity Revisited
title_sort Quality and Quantity Revisited
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Piovani, Juan Ignacio
Beigel, Maria Fernanda
author Piovani, Juan Ignacio
author_facet Piovani, Juan Ignacio
Beigel, Maria Fernanda
author_role author
author2 Beigel, Maria Fernanda
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Reactivity
Reliability
Quantity
Quality
topic Reactivity
Reliability
Quantity
Quality
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper attempts to discuss the qualitative methodological approach of Jack Katz in itshistorical framework of production. In doing so, we aim to analyze the actual relevance of thesediscussions and their impact in the qualitative-quantitative dilemma. Revisiting Katz´s ideas andcomplementing them with some critical remarks about the limits, misuses and biases of the four R (representativeness, reactivity, reliability and replicability) in quantitative research implies asignificant contribution to the understanding of qualitative research?s value in its own terms. Inmany ways, Katz?s methodological ideas anticipate later developments.
Cet article a pour objectif de discuter l'approche méthodologique qualitative de Jack Katz dans son cadre historique de production. Ce faisant, nous cherchons à analyser la pertinence réelle de ces discussions et leurs impacts dans le dilemme « qualitatif et quantitatif ». Le réexamen des idées de Katz (que viendront compléter quelques remarques critiques sur les limites, les mésusages et les préjugés liés aux 4R (représentativité, réactivité, fiabilité, reproductibilité) dans la recherche quantitative) engage une contribution importante à la compréhension de la valeur de la recherche qualitative dans ses propres termes. À bien des égards, les idées méthodologiques de Katz anticipent les évolutions postérieures.
Fil: Piovani, Juan Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Beigel, Maria Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo; Argentina
description This paper attempts to discuss the qualitative methodological approach of Jack Katz in itshistorical framework of production. In doing so, we aim to analyze the actual relevance of thesediscussions and their impact in the qualitative-quantitative dilemma. Revisiting Katz´s ideas andcomplementing them with some critical remarks about the limits, misuses and biases of the four R (representativeness, reactivity, reliability and replicability) in quantitative research implies asignificant contribution to the understanding of qualitative research?s value in its own terms. Inmany ways, Katz?s methodological ideas anticipate later developments.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/41051
Piovani, Juan Ignacio; Beigel, Maria Fernanda; Quality and Quantity Revisited; ROUTLEDGE; Methods; I; 1-2; 6-2015; 163-168
2375-4745
2375-4753
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/41051
identifier_str_mv Piovani, Juan Ignacio; Beigel, Maria Fernanda; Quality and Quantity Revisited; ROUTLEDGE; Methods; I; 1-2; 6-2015; 163-168
2375-4745
2375-4753
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/23754745.2015.1017290
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23754745.2015.1017290
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ROUTLEDGE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ROUTLEDGE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613318429376512
score 13.070432