The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse

Autores
Wilcox, Sherman; Martínez, Rocío Anabel
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of Cognitive Grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a specific spatial location in the context of a usage event.In the present article, we analyze the referential function of Places in different grammatical constructions throughout a selection of videos produced by deaf Argentine Sign Language signers. Our analysis examines Places which are associated with entities in the surrounding spatial environment, as well as Places that are created or recruited in discourse without reference to surrounding physical entities. We observe that Places are used in pointing, placing, and other grammatical constructions in order to introduce and track referents in ongoing discourse. We also examine the use of conceptual reference points, by which Places afford mental access to new related concepts that are the intended focus of attention.These results allow us to discuss three related issues. First, for signed language discourse, space is both semantically and phonologically loaded. Signers? semantic and phonological choices for Place symbolic structures are motivated by embodied experience and the abstraction of usage events. Second, Places occur along a continuum from deixis to anaphor, united by the same conceptual system and differing in extent of phonological subjectification. Third, we suggest developmental implications of our Place analysis.
Fil: Wilcox, Sherman. University of New Mexico; Estados Unidos
Fil: Martínez, Rocío Anabel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Lingüística; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
SIGNED LANGUAGE
COGNITIVE GRAMMAR
POINTING
REFERENCE POINTS
DEIXIS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169342

id CONICETDig_222636dbcc06deb85e0bb65e554d2d66
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169342
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language DiscourseWilcox, ShermanMartínez, Rocío AnabelSIGNED LANGUAGECOGNITIVE GRAMMARPOINTINGREFERENCE POINTSDEIXIShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6We examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of Cognitive Grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a specific spatial location in the context of a usage event.In the present article, we analyze the referential function of Places in different grammatical constructions throughout a selection of videos produced by deaf Argentine Sign Language signers. Our analysis examines Places which are associated with entities in the surrounding spatial environment, as well as Places that are created or recruited in discourse without reference to surrounding physical entities. We observe that Places are used in pointing, placing, and other grammatical constructions in order to introduce and track referents in ongoing discourse. We also examine the use of conceptual reference points, by which Places afford mental access to new related concepts that are the intended focus of attention.These results allow us to discuss three related issues. First, for signed language discourse, space is both semantically and phonologically loaded. Signers? semantic and phonological choices for Place symbolic structures are motivated by embodied experience and the abstraction of usage events. Second, Places occur along a continuum from deixis to anaphor, united by the same conceptual system and differing in extent of phonological subjectification. Third, we suggest developmental implications of our Place analysis.Fil: Wilcox, Sherman. University of New Mexico; Estados UnidosFil: Martínez, Rocío Anabel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Lingüística; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFrontiers Media2020-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/169342Wilcox, Sherman; Martínez, Rocío Anabel; The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Psychology; 11; 7-2020; 1-161664-1078CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Psychology&id=535539info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:19:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169342instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:19:33.275CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
spellingShingle The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
Wilcox, Sherman
SIGNED LANGUAGE
COGNITIVE GRAMMAR
POINTING
REFERENCE POINTS
DEIXIS
title_short The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_full The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_fullStr The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_full_unstemmed The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_sort The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Wilcox, Sherman
Martínez, Rocío Anabel
author Wilcox, Sherman
author_facet Wilcox, Sherman
Martínez, Rocío Anabel
author_role author
author2 Martínez, Rocío Anabel
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SIGNED LANGUAGE
COGNITIVE GRAMMAR
POINTING
REFERENCE POINTS
DEIXIS
topic SIGNED LANGUAGE
COGNITIVE GRAMMAR
POINTING
REFERENCE POINTS
DEIXIS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of Cognitive Grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a specific spatial location in the context of a usage event.In the present article, we analyze the referential function of Places in different grammatical constructions throughout a selection of videos produced by deaf Argentine Sign Language signers. Our analysis examines Places which are associated with entities in the surrounding spatial environment, as well as Places that are created or recruited in discourse without reference to surrounding physical entities. We observe that Places are used in pointing, placing, and other grammatical constructions in order to introduce and track referents in ongoing discourse. We also examine the use of conceptual reference points, by which Places afford mental access to new related concepts that are the intended focus of attention.These results allow us to discuss three related issues. First, for signed language discourse, space is both semantically and phonologically loaded. Signers? semantic and phonological choices for Place symbolic structures are motivated by embodied experience and the abstraction of usage events. Second, Places occur along a continuum from deixis to anaphor, united by the same conceptual system and differing in extent of phonological subjectification. Third, we suggest developmental implications of our Place analysis.
Fil: Wilcox, Sherman. University of New Mexico; Estados Unidos
Fil: Martínez, Rocío Anabel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Lingüística; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description We examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of Cognitive Grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a specific spatial location in the context of a usage event.In the present article, we analyze the referential function of Places in different grammatical constructions throughout a selection of videos produced by deaf Argentine Sign Language signers. Our analysis examines Places which are associated with entities in the surrounding spatial environment, as well as Places that are created or recruited in discourse without reference to surrounding physical entities. We observe that Places are used in pointing, placing, and other grammatical constructions in order to introduce and track referents in ongoing discourse. We also examine the use of conceptual reference points, by which Places afford mental access to new related concepts that are the intended focus of attention.These results allow us to discuss three related issues. First, for signed language discourse, space is both semantically and phonologically loaded. Signers? semantic and phonological choices for Place symbolic structures are motivated by embodied experience and the abstraction of usage events. Second, Places occur along a continuum from deixis to anaphor, united by the same conceptual system and differing in extent of phonological subjectification. Third, we suggest developmental implications of our Place analysis.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169342
Wilcox, Sherman; Martínez, Rocío Anabel; The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Psychology; 11; 7-2020; 1-16
1664-1078
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169342
identifier_str_mv Wilcox, Sherman; Martínez, Rocío Anabel; The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Psychology; 11; 7-2020; 1-16
1664-1078
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Psychology&id=535539
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083344402481152
score 13.22299