Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought

Autores
Leach, Stephen; Mina, Federico Daniel
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
parte de libro
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This little piece is intended as an introduction to the two papers that follow it, which focus on two thinkers of Late Imperial China: Hong Yingming (1593-1655) and Li Zhi (1527-1602). Though both are better understood as inheritors of a tradition than creators in their own right, they still prove valuable subjects for investigation, for two reasons in particular. First, the traditions to which they are heirs have an important history in their own right, and contextualizing the work of these authors provides an opportunity to survey briefly some of the major changes that Confucianism underwent during its long progress from inception in the Golden Age of Philosophy during the Warring States to the chaotic last years of the Ming Dynasty, the time of our authors. Both fluctuations in politics and permutations due to Daoist and Buddhist influence in the intervening centuries produced a Confucianism that differs markedly in focus and in tone, if not in essence, from its earlier forms, and our analysis supports a nuanced view of Confucianism, rather than the somewhat monolithic impression that study of the Analects, the Mencius, and Xunzi alone might produce. Second, these two thinkers were not mere academicians, but actively sought to live out the philosophies they embraced in their daily lives, with an existential commitment even more significant due to the tenor of their times. Here we follow Phillip Ivanhoe’s basic schema in rendering the historical context, and rely on close-reading, textual analysis, and, where tenable, biographical data, to reveal the what we find to be distinctive in the life-philosophies of Hong Yingming and Li Zhi, regarding authenticity in self-cultivation, the diminished role of study and tradition, and their ambivalence (or animosity) towards the status quo.
Fil: Leach, Stephen. University of Texas; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mina, Federico Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina
Materia
Hong Yingming
Li Zhi
Ming Dynasty
Confucianism
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203180

id CONICETDig_0b188ba88d519ecb5229e63610b9f1a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203180
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Cherishing Life in Late Ming ThoughtLeach, StephenMina, Federico DanielHong YingmingLi ZhiMing DynastyConfucianismhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This little piece is intended as an introduction to the two papers that follow it, which focus on two thinkers of Late Imperial China: Hong Yingming (1593-1655) and Li Zhi (1527-1602). Though both are better understood as inheritors of a tradition than creators in their own right, they still prove valuable subjects for investigation, for two reasons in particular. First, the traditions to which they are heirs have an important history in their own right, and contextualizing the work of these authors provides an opportunity to survey briefly some of the major changes that Confucianism underwent during its long progress from inception in the Golden Age of Philosophy during the Warring States to the chaotic last years of the Ming Dynasty, the time of our authors. Both fluctuations in politics and permutations due to Daoist and Buddhist influence in the intervening centuries produced a Confucianism that differs markedly in focus and in tone, if not in essence, from its earlier forms, and our analysis supports a nuanced view of Confucianism, rather than the somewhat monolithic impression that study of the Analects, the Mencius, and Xunzi alone might produce. Second, these two thinkers were not mere academicians, but actively sought to live out the philosophies they embraced in their daily lives, with an existential commitment even more significant due to the tenor of their times. Here we follow Phillip Ivanhoe’s basic schema in rendering the historical context, and rely on close-reading, textual analysis, and, where tenable, biographical data, to reveal the what we find to be distinctive in the life-philosophies of Hong Yingming and Li Zhi, regarding authenticity in self-cultivation, the diminished role of study and tradition, and their ambivalence (or animosity) towards the status quo.Fil: Leach, Stephen. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Mina, Federico Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; ArgentinaChinese University of Hong KongMina, Federico DanielLeach, Stephen2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/203180Leach, Stephen; Mina, Federico Daniel; Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought; Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2022; 53-62978-988-237-266-5CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://cup.cuhk.edu.hk/SDCFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T10:20:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203180instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 10:20:59.59CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
title Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
spellingShingle Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
Leach, Stephen
Hong Yingming
Li Zhi
Ming Dynasty
Confucianism
title_short Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
title_full Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
title_fullStr Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
title_full_unstemmed Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
title_sort Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Leach, Stephen
Mina, Federico Daniel
author Leach, Stephen
author_facet Leach, Stephen
Mina, Federico Daniel
author_role author
author2 Mina, Federico Daniel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Mina, Federico Daniel
Leach, Stephen
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Hong Yingming
Li Zhi
Ming Dynasty
Confucianism
topic Hong Yingming
Li Zhi
Ming Dynasty
Confucianism
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This little piece is intended as an introduction to the two papers that follow it, which focus on two thinkers of Late Imperial China: Hong Yingming (1593-1655) and Li Zhi (1527-1602). Though both are better understood as inheritors of a tradition than creators in their own right, they still prove valuable subjects for investigation, for two reasons in particular. First, the traditions to which they are heirs have an important history in their own right, and contextualizing the work of these authors provides an opportunity to survey briefly some of the major changes that Confucianism underwent during its long progress from inception in the Golden Age of Philosophy during the Warring States to the chaotic last years of the Ming Dynasty, the time of our authors. Both fluctuations in politics and permutations due to Daoist and Buddhist influence in the intervening centuries produced a Confucianism that differs markedly in focus and in tone, if not in essence, from its earlier forms, and our analysis supports a nuanced view of Confucianism, rather than the somewhat monolithic impression that study of the Analects, the Mencius, and Xunzi alone might produce. Second, these two thinkers were not mere academicians, but actively sought to live out the philosophies they embraced in their daily lives, with an existential commitment even more significant due to the tenor of their times. Here we follow Phillip Ivanhoe’s basic schema in rendering the historical context, and rely on close-reading, textual analysis, and, where tenable, biographical data, to reveal the what we find to be distinctive in the life-philosophies of Hong Yingming and Li Zhi, regarding authenticity in self-cultivation, the diminished role of study and tradition, and their ambivalence (or animosity) towards the status quo.
Fil: Leach, Stephen. University of Texas; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mina, Federico Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina
description This little piece is intended as an introduction to the two papers that follow it, which focus on two thinkers of Late Imperial China: Hong Yingming (1593-1655) and Li Zhi (1527-1602). Though both are better understood as inheritors of a tradition than creators in their own right, they still prove valuable subjects for investigation, for two reasons in particular. First, the traditions to which they are heirs have an important history in their own right, and contextualizing the work of these authors provides an opportunity to survey briefly some of the major changes that Confucianism underwent during its long progress from inception in the Golden Age of Philosophy during the Warring States to the chaotic last years of the Ming Dynasty, the time of our authors. Both fluctuations in politics and permutations due to Daoist and Buddhist influence in the intervening centuries produced a Confucianism that differs markedly in focus and in tone, if not in essence, from its earlier forms, and our analysis supports a nuanced view of Confucianism, rather than the somewhat monolithic impression that study of the Analects, the Mencius, and Xunzi alone might produce. Second, these two thinkers were not mere academicians, but actively sought to live out the philosophies they embraced in their daily lives, with an existential commitment even more significant due to the tenor of their times. Here we follow Phillip Ivanhoe’s basic schema in rendering the historical context, and rely on close-reading, textual analysis, and, where tenable, biographical data, to reveal the what we find to be distinctive in the life-philosophies of Hong Yingming and Li Zhi, regarding authenticity in self-cultivation, the diminished role of study and tradition, and their ambivalence (or animosity) towards the status quo.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro
status_str publishedVersion
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203180
Leach, Stephen; Mina, Federico Daniel; Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought; Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2022; 53-62
978-988-237-266-5
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203180
identifier_str_mv Leach, Stephen; Mina, Federico Daniel; Cherishing Life in Late Ming Thought; Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2022; 53-62
978-988-237-266-5
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://cup.cuhk.edu.hk/SDCF
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Chinese University of Hong Kong
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Chinese University of Hong Kong
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1858305582763606016
score 13.176822