The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?

Autores
Perez, Diana Ines
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote."
Fil: Perez, Diana Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Materia
ONTOLOGY
WORK OF ART
PIERRE MENARD
J.L.BORGES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192500

id CONICETDig_0504e82c445f7723f7b3ee74e8e16503
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192500
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?Perez, Diana InesONTOLOGYWORK OF ARTPIERRE MENARDJ.L.BORGEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote."Fil: Perez, Diana Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaMichigan State University Press2011-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/192500Perez, Diana Ines; The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?; Michigan State University Press; The New Centennial Review; 11; 1; 3-2011; 75-891539-6630CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/msup/cr/article-abstract/11/1/75/177966/The-Ontology-of-Art-What-Can-We-Learn-from-Borges?info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2307/41949728info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:02:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192500instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:02:22.431CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
title The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
spellingShingle The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
Perez, Diana Ines
ONTOLOGY
WORK OF ART
PIERRE MENARD
J.L.BORGES
title_short The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
title_full The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
title_fullStr The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
title_full_unstemmed The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
title_sort The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Perez, Diana Ines
author Perez, Diana Ines
author_facet Perez, Diana Ines
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ONTOLOGY
WORK OF ART
PIERRE MENARD
J.L.BORGES
topic ONTOLOGY
WORK OF ART
PIERRE MENARD
J.L.BORGES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote."
Fil: Perez, Diana Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
description The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote."
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192500
Perez, Diana Ines; The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?; Michigan State University Press; The New Centennial Review; 11; 1; 3-2011; 75-89
1539-6630
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192500
identifier_str_mv Perez, Diana Ines; The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?; Michigan State University Press; The New Centennial Review; 11; 1; 3-2011; 75-89
1539-6630
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/msup/cr/article-abstract/11/1/75/177966/The-Ontology-of-Art-What-Can-We-Learn-from-Borges?
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2307/41949728
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Michigan State University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Michigan State University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269753364709376
score 13.13397