The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?
- Autores
- Perez, Diana Ines
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote."
Fil: Perez, Diana Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina - Materia
-
ONTOLOGY
WORK OF ART
PIERRE MENARD
J.L.BORGES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192500
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_0504e82c445f7723f7b3ee74e8e16503 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192500 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?Perez, Diana InesONTOLOGYWORK OF ARTPIERRE MENARDJ.L.BORGEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote."Fil: Perez, Diana Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaMichigan State University Press2011-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/192500Perez, Diana Ines; The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?; Michigan State University Press; The New Centennial Review; 11; 1; 3-2011; 75-891539-6630CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/msup/cr/article-abstract/11/1/75/177966/The-Ontology-of-Art-What-Can-We-Learn-from-Borges?info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2307/41949728info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:02:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192500instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:02:22.431CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? |
title |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? |
spellingShingle |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? Perez, Diana Ines ONTOLOGY WORK OF ART PIERRE MENARD J.L.BORGES |
title_short |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? |
title_full |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? |
title_fullStr |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? |
title_sort |
The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Perez, Diana Ines |
author |
Perez, Diana Ines |
author_facet |
Perez, Diana Ines |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ONTOLOGY WORK OF ART PIERRE MENARD J.L.BORGES |
topic |
ONTOLOGY WORK OF ART PIERRE MENARD J.L.BORGES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote." Fil: Perez, Diana Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina |
description |
The question I want to analyze in this paper can be summarized as follows: what is the nature of works of art? This question can be divided into two separate ones: (1) what differential feature separate objects which are works of art from other objects which we usually do not consider as such?, and (2) to what kind of ontological category do works of art belong to? The recent discussions around this second topic are usually framed by the more traditional ontological discussion about universals. Thus, in order to answer the second question, philosophers generally use the distinction between universal-particular or type-token. But nobody would say that every universal (if she is universalist) or every particular (if particularist) is a work of art. Because works of art should have "something more". But what is this "something more"? In this paper I will try to answer these questions inspired by the ideas J.L. Borges developed in the short story: "Pierre Menard, author of the Quixote." |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192500 Perez, Diana Ines; The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?; Michigan State University Press; The New Centennial Review; 11; 1; 3-2011; 75-89 1539-6630 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192500 |
identifier_str_mv |
Perez, Diana Ines; The Ontology of Art: What Can We Learn from Borges’s "Menard"?; Michigan State University Press; The New Centennial Review; 11; 1; 3-2011; 75-89 1539-6630 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/msup/cr/article-abstract/11/1/75/177966/The-Ontology-of-Art-What-Can-We-Learn-from-Borges? info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2307/41949728 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Michigan State University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Michigan State University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269753364709376 |
score |
13.13397 |