Very rare defects: What can we learn?
- Autores
- Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy.
Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Genética Médica Populacional; Brasil. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia
Fil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects and Research ; Italia - Materia
-
CLEARINGHOUSE
ICBDSR
RARE ANOMALIES
RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
RARE DEFECTS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192690
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_cc0d85a8ebf48a0408bdc53bdcdaaeaa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192690 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Very rare defects: What can we learn?Castilla, Eduardo EnriqueMastroiacovo, PierpaoloCLEARINGHOUSEICBDSRRARE ANOMALIESRARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIESRARE DEFECTShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy.Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Genética Médica Populacional; Brasil. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; ItaliaFil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects and Research ; ItaliaWiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.2011-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/192690Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo; Very rare defects: What can we learn?; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 7-2011; 252-2611552-4868CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:00:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192690instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:00:30.181CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? |
title |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? |
spellingShingle |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? Castilla, Eduardo Enrique CLEARINGHOUSE ICBDSR RARE ANOMALIES RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES RARE DEFECTS |
title_short |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? |
title_full |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? |
title_fullStr |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? |
title_sort |
Very rare defects: What can we learn? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo |
author |
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique |
author_facet |
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CLEARINGHOUSE ICBDSR RARE ANOMALIES RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES RARE DEFECTS |
topic |
CLEARINGHOUSE ICBDSR RARE ANOMALIES RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES RARE DEFECTS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy. Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Genética Médica Populacional; Brasil. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia Fil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects and Research ; Italia |
description |
The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192690 Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo; Very rare defects: What can we learn?; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 7-2011; 252-261 1552-4868 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192690 |
identifier_str_mv |
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo; Very rare defects: What can we learn?; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 7-2011; 252-261 1552-4868 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269641681928192 |
score |
13.13397 |