Very rare defects: What can we learn?

Autores
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy.
Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Genética Médica Populacional; Brasil. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia
Fil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects and Research ; Italia
Materia
CLEARINGHOUSE
ICBDSR
RARE ANOMALIES
RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
RARE DEFECTS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192690

id CONICETDig_cc0d85a8ebf48a0408bdc53bdcdaaeaa
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192690
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Very rare defects: What can we learn?Castilla, Eduardo EnriqueMastroiacovo, PierpaoloCLEARINGHOUSEICBDSRRARE ANOMALIESRARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIESRARE DEFECTShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy.Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Genética Médica Populacional; Brasil. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; ItaliaFil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects and Research ; ItaliaWiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.2011-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/192690Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo; Very rare defects: What can we learn?; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 7-2011; 252-2611552-4868CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:00:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192690instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:00:30.181CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Very rare defects: What can we learn?
title Very rare defects: What can we learn?
spellingShingle Very rare defects: What can we learn?
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
CLEARINGHOUSE
ICBDSR
RARE ANOMALIES
RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
RARE DEFECTS
title_short Very rare defects: What can we learn?
title_full Very rare defects: What can we learn?
title_fullStr Very rare defects: What can we learn?
title_full_unstemmed Very rare defects: What can we learn?
title_sort Very rare defects: What can we learn?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
author Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
author_facet Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
author_role author
author2 Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CLEARINGHOUSE
ICBDSR
RARE ANOMALIES
RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
RARE DEFECTS
topic CLEARINGHOUSE
ICBDSR
RARE ANOMALIES
RARE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
RARE DEFECTS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy.
Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Genética Médica Populacional; Brasil. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia
Fil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects and Research ; Italia
description The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research conducted a study on very rare defects (VRDs) to test methodologies in their population surveillance and to increase the knowledge of their epidemiology. Eight VRDs: acardia (AC), amelia (AM), bladder exstrophy (BE), cloaca exstrophy (CE), conjoined twins (CT), cyclopia (CY), "true" phocomelia (PH), and sirenomelia (SI) were selected, all of whom showed prevalences in the order of 1/100,000 births, except for BE: 1/48,000 births. Materials in this investigation from 25 million pregnancy outcomes, were provided by 22 Clearinghouse-member programs. The study protocol provided a working definition, a summary of the phenotypic characteristic, and a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for each VRDs. Learned lessons include: (1) The suspected associations of decreasing risk with advancing maternal age in AM and SI, and increasing risk in BE, and increasing frequency of twins in SI, were confirmed. (2) Morphologically similar defects showed dissimilar epidemiological characteristics, namely, AM and PH, and BE and CE. (3) Heterogeneity in total prevalences for most VRDs among different surveillance programs were attributed to operational reasons, except for SI and CT in which Amerindian ethnicity seems to be associated with higher prevalence. (4) Verbatim description is essential and must be stored in electronic files. In addition to codes. (5) Dysmorphologists or clinical geneticists are an essential part of the coordinating team of the surveillance program. (6) ICD coding system is insufficient. (7) Surveillance programs should be a valuable source of information on exposures to risk factors during pregnancy.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192690
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo; Very rare defects: What can we learn?; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 7-2011; 252-261
1552-4868
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192690
identifier_str_mv Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo; Very rare defects: What can we learn?; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 7-2011; 252-261
1552-4868
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30315
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269641681928192
score 13.13397