Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
- Autores
- Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; Soussana, Jean-François; Christensen, Torben R.; Heath, Linda; Apps, Mike; Alexeyev, Vlady; Fang, Jingyun; Gattuso, Jean Pierre; Guerschman, Juan Pablo; Huang, Yao; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Murdiyarso, Daniel; Ni, Jian; Nobre, Antonio; Peng, Changhui; Walcroft, Adrian; Wang, Shao Qiang; Pan, Yude; Zhou, Guang Sheng
- Año de publicación
- 2008
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets.
Fil: Smith, Pete. University Of Aberdeen. School Of Biological Sciences.; Reino Unido
Fil: Nabuurs, Gert Jan. Wageningen University; Países Bajos
Fil: Janssens, Iván A.. Universiteit Antwerp; Bélgica
Fil: Reis, Stefan. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Marland, Gregg. Mid Sweden University.; Suecia
Fil: Soussana, Jean-François. Instituto National de Recherches Agronomiques. Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages; Francia
Fil: Christensen, Torben R.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Heath, Linda. No especifíca;
Fil: Apps, Mike. Pacific Forestry Centre; Canadá
Fil: Alexeyev, Vlady. Russian Academy of Science; Rusia
Fil: Fang, Jingyun. Peking University; China
Fil: Gattuso, Jean Pierre. Observatoire Océanologique; Francia
Fil: Guerschman, Juan Pablo. No especifíca;
Fil: Huang, Yao. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; China
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina
Fil: Murdiyarso, Daniel. Center for International Forestry Research; Indonesia
Fil: Ni, Jian. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
Fil: Nobre, Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Brasil
Fil: Peng, Changhui. Université du Québec a Montreal; Canadá
Fil: Walcroft, Adrian. Crown Research Institutes. Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Wang, Shao Qiang. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
Fil: Pan, Yude. No especifíca;
Fil: Zhou, Guang Sheng. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China - Materia
-
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE
FOREST SECTOR
GLOB CHANG BIOL
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135144
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_018a99e5e0994b9b8ef43ecdc530af82 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135144 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgetsSmith, PeteNabuurs, Gert JanJanssens, Iván A.Reis, StefanMarland, GreggSoussana, Jean-FrançoisChristensen, Torben R.Heath, LindaApps, MikeAlexeyev, VladyFang, JingyunGattuso, Jean PierreGuerschman, Juan PabloHuang, YaoJobbagy Gampel, Esteban GabrielMurdiyarso, DanielNi, JianNobre, AntonioPeng, ChanghuiWalcroft, AdrianWang, Shao QiangPan, YudeZhou, Guang ShengSOIL ORGANIC CARBONGLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLEFOREST SECTORGLOB CHANG BIOLSOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets.Fil: Smith, Pete. University Of Aberdeen. School Of Biological Sciences.; Reino UnidoFil: Nabuurs, Gert Jan. Wageningen University; Países BajosFil: Janssens, Iván A.. Universiteit Antwerp; BélgicaFil: Reis, Stefan. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino UnidoFil: Marland, Gregg. Mid Sweden University.; SueciaFil: Soussana, Jean-François. Instituto National de Recherches Agronomiques. Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages; FranciaFil: Christensen, Torben R.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Heath, Linda. No especifíca;Fil: Apps, Mike. Pacific Forestry Centre; CanadáFil: Alexeyev, Vlady. Russian Academy of Science; RusiaFil: Fang, Jingyun. Peking University; ChinaFil: Gattuso, Jean Pierre. Observatoire Océanologique; FranciaFil: Guerschman, Juan Pablo. No especifíca;Fil: Huang, Yao. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; ChinaFil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; ArgentinaFil: Murdiyarso, Daniel. Center for International Forestry Research; IndonesiaFil: Ni, Jian. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; ChinaFil: Nobre, Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Peng, Changhui. Université du Québec a Montreal; CanadáFil: Walcroft, Adrian. Crown Research Institutes. Landcare Research; Nueva ZelandaFil: Wang, Shao Qiang. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; ChinaFil: Pan, Yude. No especifíca;Fil: Zhou, Guang Sheng. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; ChinaSpringer2008-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/135144Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; et al.; Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets; Springer; Climatic Change; 88; 3-4; 12-2008; 209-2490165-0009CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-007-9378-5info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:20:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135144instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:20:59.346CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
spellingShingle |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets Smith, Pete SOIL ORGANIC CARBON GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE FOREST SECTOR GLOB CHANG BIOL SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION |
title_short |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_full |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_fullStr |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_sort |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Smith, Pete Nabuurs, Gert Jan Janssens, Iván A. Reis, Stefan Marland, Gregg Soussana, Jean-François Christensen, Torben R. Heath, Linda Apps, Mike Alexeyev, Vlady Fang, Jingyun Gattuso, Jean Pierre Guerschman, Juan Pablo Huang, Yao Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Murdiyarso, Daniel Ni, Jian Nobre, Antonio Peng, Changhui Walcroft, Adrian Wang, Shao Qiang Pan, Yude Zhou, Guang Sheng |
author |
Smith, Pete |
author_facet |
Smith, Pete Nabuurs, Gert Jan Janssens, Iván A. Reis, Stefan Marland, Gregg Soussana, Jean-François Christensen, Torben R. Heath, Linda Apps, Mike Alexeyev, Vlady Fang, Jingyun Gattuso, Jean Pierre Guerschman, Juan Pablo Huang, Yao Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Murdiyarso, Daniel Ni, Jian Nobre, Antonio Peng, Changhui Walcroft, Adrian Wang, Shao Qiang Pan, Yude Zhou, Guang Sheng |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nabuurs, Gert Jan Janssens, Iván A. Reis, Stefan Marland, Gregg Soussana, Jean-François Christensen, Torben R. Heath, Linda Apps, Mike Alexeyev, Vlady Fang, Jingyun Gattuso, Jean Pierre Guerschman, Juan Pablo Huang, Yao Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Murdiyarso, Daniel Ni, Jian Nobre, Antonio Peng, Changhui Walcroft, Adrian Wang, Shao Qiang Pan, Yude Zhou, Guang Sheng |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE FOREST SECTOR GLOB CHANG BIOL SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION |
topic |
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE FOREST SECTOR GLOB CHANG BIOL SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets. Fil: Smith, Pete. University Of Aberdeen. School Of Biological Sciences.; Reino Unido Fil: Nabuurs, Gert Jan. Wageningen University; Países Bajos Fil: Janssens, Iván A.. Universiteit Antwerp; Bélgica Fil: Reis, Stefan. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino Unido Fil: Marland, Gregg. Mid Sweden University.; Suecia Fil: Soussana, Jean-François. Instituto National de Recherches Agronomiques. Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages; Francia Fil: Christensen, Torben R.. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Heath, Linda. No especifíca; Fil: Apps, Mike. Pacific Forestry Centre; Canadá Fil: Alexeyev, Vlady. Russian Academy of Science; Rusia Fil: Fang, Jingyun. Peking University; China Fil: Gattuso, Jean Pierre. Observatoire Océanologique; Francia Fil: Guerschman, Juan Pablo. No especifíca; Fil: Huang, Yao. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; China Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina Fil: Murdiyarso, Daniel. Center for International Forestry Research; Indonesia Fil: Ni, Jian. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China Fil: Nobre, Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Brasil Fil: Peng, Changhui. Université du Québec a Montreal; Canadá Fil: Walcroft, Adrian. Crown Research Institutes. Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Wang, Shao Qiang. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China Fil: Pan, Yude. No especifíca; Fil: Zhou, Guang Sheng. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China |
description |
Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135144 Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; et al.; Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets; Springer; Climatic Change; 88; 3-4; 12-2008; 209-249 0165-0009 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135144 |
identifier_str_mv |
Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; et al.; Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets; Springer; Climatic Change; 88; 3-4; 12-2008; 209-249 0165-0009 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-007-9378-5 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846082592962510848 |
score |
13.22299 |