Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets

Autores
Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; Soussana, Jean-François; Christensen, Torben R.; Heath, Linda; Apps, Mike; Alexeyev, Vlady; Fang, Jingyun; Gattuso, Jean Pierre; Guerschman, Juan Pablo; Huang, Yao; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Murdiyarso, Daniel; Ni, Jian; Nobre, Antonio; Peng, Changhui; Walcroft, Adrian; Wang, Shao Qiang; Pan, Yude; Zhou, Guang Sheng
Año de publicación
2008
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets.
Fil: Smith, Pete. University Of Aberdeen. School Of Biological Sciences.; Reino Unido
Fil: Nabuurs, Gert Jan. Wageningen University; Países Bajos
Fil: Janssens, Iván A.. Universiteit Antwerp; Bélgica
Fil: Reis, Stefan. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Marland, Gregg. Mid Sweden University.; Suecia
Fil: Soussana, Jean-François. Instituto National de Recherches Agronomiques. Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages; Francia
Fil: Christensen, Torben R.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Heath, Linda. No especifíca;
Fil: Apps, Mike. Pacific Forestry Centre; Canadá
Fil: Alexeyev, Vlady. Russian Academy of Science; Rusia
Fil: Fang, Jingyun. Peking University; China
Fil: Gattuso, Jean Pierre. Observatoire Océanologique; Francia
Fil: Guerschman, Juan Pablo. No especifíca;
Fil: Huang, Yao. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; China
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina
Fil: Murdiyarso, Daniel. Center for International Forestry Research; Indonesia
Fil: Ni, Jian. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
Fil: Nobre, Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Brasil
Fil: Peng, Changhui. Université du Québec a Montreal; Canadá
Fil: Walcroft, Adrian. Crown Research Institutes. Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Wang, Shao Qiang. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
Fil: Pan, Yude. No especifíca;
Fil: Zhou, Guang Sheng. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
Materia
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE
FOREST SECTOR
GLOB CHANG BIOL
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135144

id CONICETDig_018a99e5e0994b9b8ef43ecdc530af82
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135144
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgetsSmith, PeteNabuurs, Gert JanJanssens, Iván A.Reis, StefanMarland, GreggSoussana, Jean-FrançoisChristensen, Torben R.Heath, LindaApps, MikeAlexeyev, VladyFang, JingyunGattuso, Jean PierreGuerschman, Juan PabloHuang, YaoJobbagy Gampel, Esteban GabrielMurdiyarso, DanielNi, JianNobre, AntonioPeng, ChanghuiWalcroft, AdrianWang, Shao QiangPan, YudeZhou, Guang ShengSOIL ORGANIC CARBONGLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLEFOREST SECTORGLOB CHANG BIOLSOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets.Fil: Smith, Pete. University Of Aberdeen. School Of Biological Sciences.; Reino UnidoFil: Nabuurs, Gert Jan. Wageningen University; Países BajosFil: Janssens, Iván A.. Universiteit Antwerp; BélgicaFil: Reis, Stefan. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino UnidoFil: Marland, Gregg. Mid Sweden University.; SueciaFil: Soussana, Jean-François. Instituto National de Recherches Agronomiques. Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages; FranciaFil: Christensen, Torben R.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Heath, Linda. No especifíca;Fil: Apps, Mike. Pacific Forestry Centre; CanadáFil: Alexeyev, Vlady. Russian Academy of Science; RusiaFil: Fang, Jingyun. Peking University; ChinaFil: Gattuso, Jean Pierre. Observatoire Océanologique; FranciaFil: Guerschman, Juan Pablo. No especifíca;Fil: Huang, Yao. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; ChinaFil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; ArgentinaFil: Murdiyarso, Daniel. Center for International Forestry Research; IndonesiaFil: Ni, Jian. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; ChinaFil: Nobre, Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Peng, Changhui. Université du Québec a Montreal; CanadáFil: Walcroft, Adrian. Crown Research Institutes. Landcare Research; Nueva ZelandaFil: Wang, Shao Qiang. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; ChinaFil: Pan, Yude. No especifíca;Fil: Zhou, Guang Sheng. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; ChinaSpringer2008-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/135144Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; et al.; Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets; Springer; Climatic Change; 88; 3-4; 12-2008; 209-2490165-0009CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-007-9378-5info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:20:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135144instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:20:59.346CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
title Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
spellingShingle Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
Smith, Pete
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE
FOREST SECTOR
GLOB CHANG BIOL
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION
title_short Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
title_full Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
title_fullStr Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
title_full_unstemmed Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
title_sort Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Smith, Pete
Nabuurs, Gert Jan
Janssens, Iván A.
Reis, Stefan
Marland, Gregg
Soussana, Jean-François
Christensen, Torben R.
Heath, Linda
Apps, Mike
Alexeyev, Vlady
Fang, Jingyun
Gattuso, Jean Pierre
Guerschman, Juan Pablo
Huang, Yao
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Murdiyarso, Daniel
Ni, Jian
Nobre, Antonio
Peng, Changhui
Walcroft, Adrian
Wang, Shao Qiang
Pan, Yude
Zhou, Guang Sheng
author Smith, Pete
author_facet Smith, Pete
Nabuurs, Gert Jan
Janssens, Iván A.
Reis, Stefan
Marland, Gregg
Soussana, Jean-François
Christensen, Torben R.
Heath, Linda
Apps, Mike
Alexeyev, Vlady
Fang, Jingyun
Gattuso, Jean Pierre
Guerschman, Juan Pablo
Huang, Yao
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Murdiyarso, Daniel
Ni, Jian
Nobre, Antonio
Peng, Changhui
Walcroft, Adrian
Wang, Shao Qiang
Pan, Yude
Zhou, Guang Sheng
author_role author
author2 Nabuurs, Gert Jan
Janssens, Iván A.
Reis, Stefan
Marland, Gregg
Soussana, Jean-François
Christensen, Torben R.
Heath, Linda
Apps, Mike
Alexeyev, Vlady
Fang, Jingyun
Gattuso, Jean Pierre
Guerschman, Juan Pablo
Huang, Yao
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Murdiyarso, Daniel
Ni, Jian
Nobre, Antonio
Peng, Changhui
Walcroft, Adrian
Wang, Shao Qiang
Pan, Yude
Zhou, Guang Sheng
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE
FOREST SECTOR
GLOB CHANG BIOL
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION
topic SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
GLOB BIOGEOCHEM CYCLE
FOREST SECTOR
GLOB CHANG BIOL
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets.
Fil: Smith, Pete. University Of Aberdeen. School Of Biological Sciences.; Reino Unido
Fil: Nabuurs, Gert Jan. Wageningen University; Países Bajos
Fil: Janssens, Iván A.. Universiteit Antwerp; Bélgica
Fil: Reis, Stefan. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Marland, Gregg. Mid Sweden University.; Suecia
Fil: Soussana, Jean-François. Instituto National de Recherches Agronomiques. Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages; Francia
Fil: Christensen, Torben R.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Heath, Linda. No especifíca;
Fil: Apps, Mike. Pacific Forestry Centre; Canadá
Fil: Alexeyev, Vlady. Russian Academy of Science; Rusia
Fil: Fang, Jingyun. Peking University; China
Fil: Gattuso, Jean Pierre. Observatoire Océanologique; Francia
Fil: Guerschman, Juan Pablo. No especifíca;
Fil: Huang, Yao. The Chinese Academy of Sciences; China
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina
Fil: Murdiyarso, Daniel. Center for International Forestry Research; Indonesia
Fil: Ni, Jian. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
Fil: Nobre, Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Brasil
Fil: Peng, Changhui. Université du Québec a Montreal; Canadá
Fil: Walcroft, Adrian. Crown Research Institutes. Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Wang, Shao Qiang. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
Fil: Pan, Yude. No especifíca;
Fil: Zhou, Guang Sheng. The Chinese Academy Of Sciences; China
description Humans utilise about 40% of the earth’s net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, landmanagement personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135144
Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; et al.; Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets; Springer; Climatic Change; 88; 3-4; 12-2008; 209-249
0165-0009
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135144
identifier_str_mv Smith, Pete; Nabuurs, Gert Jan; Janssens, Iván A.; Reis, Stefan; Marland, Gregg; et al.; Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets; Springer; Climatic Change; 88; 3-4; 12-2008; 209-249
0165-0009
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-007-9378-5
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082592962510848
score 13.22299