A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)

Autores
Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Cosentino, Diego; Semmartin, María Gisela
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Understanding how farming practices affect soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation is essential for sustainable agriculture. Agronomic decisions, such as crop sequence, significantly influence various soil properties. However, the overall benefits of crop rotation on soil structure and SOC storage remain uncertain. We compared the effects of soybean (Glycine max L.) monocropping with a three-year crop rotation comprising wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/soybean double crop, maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean on the vertical distribution of SOC up to one metredepth. Additionally, we examined carbon accumulation as particulate organic matter-carbon (POM-C), soil aggregation, and structural stability in the topsoil. Compared to monocropping, crop rotation increased SOC concentrations (19 vs. 16 gC kg soil⁻1), stock (12 vs. 10.7 MgC ha⁻1), and POM-C content (6 vs. 3.2 gC kg soil⁻1) in the first 5 cm of soil. At 20–65 cm depth, rotation showed a marginal increment of SOC stock with respect to soybean monocropping. The increased surface SOC content in the rotation positively affected the POM-C content and macro-aggregation. However, soil structural stability showed a tendency to be higher in the monocropping,especially at a depth of 5–20 cm. Overall, crop rotation demonstrated potential for enhanced carbon sequestration in temperate agroecosystems within three years, despite not significantly improving soil structural stability.
Fil: Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Poggio, Santiago Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Cosentino, Diego. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Semmartin, María Gisela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
CROP ROTATION
SOIL STRUCTURAL STABILITY
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242563
Acceder
id CONICETDig_b4cadd3dad356668ce202181046122cb
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242563
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)Urrutia Larrachea, IdoiaPoggio, Santiago LuisCosentino, DiegoSemmartin, María GiselaSOIL ORGANIC CARBONCROP ROTATIONSOIL STRUCTURAL STABILITYCARBON SEQUESTRATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Understanding how farming practices affect soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation is essential for sustainable agriculture. Agronomic decisions, such as crop sequence, significantly influence various soil properties. However, the overall benefits of crop rotation on soil structure and SOC storage remain uncertain. We compared the effects of soybean (Glycine max L.) monocropping with a three-year crop rotation comprising wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/soybean double crop, maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean on the vertical distribution of SOC up to one metredepth. Additionally, we examined carbon accumulation as particulate organic matter-carbon (POM-C), soil aggregation, and structural stability in the topsoil. Compared to monocropping, crop rotation increased SOC concentrations (19 vs. 16 gC kg soil⁻1), stock (12 vs. 10.7 MgC ha⁻1), and POM-C content (6 vs. 3.2 gC kg soil⁻1) in the first 5 cm of soil. At 20–65 cm depth, rotation showed a marginal increment of SOC stock with respect to soybean monocropping. The increased surface SOC content in the rotation positively affected the POM-C content and macro-aggregation. However, soil structural stability showed a tendency to be higher in the monocropping,especially at a depth of 5–20 cm. Overall, crop rotation demonstrated potential for enhanced carbon sequestration in temperate agroecosystems within three years, despite not significantly improving soil structural stability.Fil: Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Poggio, Santiago Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Cosentino, Diego. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Semmartin, María Gisela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaElsevier Science2024-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/242563Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Cosentino, Diego; Semmartin, María Gisela; A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina); Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 375; 7-2024; 1-80167-8809CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109183info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109183info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T11:43:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242563instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 11:43:33.259CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
title A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
spellingShingle A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
CROP ROTATION
SOIL STRUCTURAL STABILITY
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
title_short A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
title_full A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
title_sort A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia
Poggio, Santiago Luis
Cosentino, Diego
Semmartin, María Gisela
author Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia
author_facet Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia
Poggio, Santiago Luis
Cosentino, Diego
Semmartin, María Gisela
author_role author
author2 Poggio, Santiago Luis
Cosentino, Diego
Semmartin, María Gisela
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
CROP ROTATION
SOIL STRUCTURAL STABILITY
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
topic SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
CROP ROTATION
SOIL STRUCTURAL STABILITY
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Understanding how farming practices affect soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation is essential for sustainable agriculture. Agronomic decisions, such as crop sequence, significantly influence various soil properties. However, the overall benefits of crop rotation on soil structure and SOC storage remain uncertain. We compared the effects of soybean (Glycine max L.) monocropping with a three-year crop rotation comprising wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/soybean double crop, maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean on the vertical distribution of SOC up to one metredepth. Additionally, we examined carbon accumulation as particulate organic matter-carbon (POM-C), soil aggregation, and structural stability in the topsoil. Compared to monocropping, crop rotation increased SOC concentrations (19 vs. 16 gC kg soil⁻1), stock (12 vs. 10.7 MgC ha⁻1), and POM-C content (6 vs. 3.2 gC kg soil⁻1) in the first 5 cm of soil. At 20–65 cm depth, rotation showed a marginal increment of SOC stock with respect to soybean monocropping. The increased surface SOC content in the rotation positively affected the POM-C content and macro-aggregation. However, soil structural stability showed a tendency to be higher in the monocropping,especially at a depth of 5–20 cm. Overall, crop rotation demonstrated potential for enhanced carbon sequestration in temperate agroecosystems within three years, despite not significantly improving soil structural stability.
Fil: Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Poggio, Santiago Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Cosentino, Diego. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Semmartin, María Gisela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Understanding how farming practices affect soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation is essential for sustainable agriculture. Agronomic decisions, such as crop sequence, significantly influence various soil properties. However, the overall benefits of crop rotation on soil structure and SOC storage remain uncertain. We compared the effects of soybean (Glycine max L.) monocropping with a three-year crop rotation comprising wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/soybean double crop, maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean on the vertical distribution of SOC up to one metredepth. Additionally, we examined carbon accumulation as particulate organic matter-carbon (POM-C), soil aggregation, and structural stability in the topsoil. Compared to monocropping, crop rotation increased SOC concentrations (19 vs. 16 gC kg soil⁻1), stock (12 vs. 10.7 MgC ha⁻1), and POM-C content (6 vs. 3.2 gC kg soil⁻1) in the first 5 cm of soil. At 20–65 cm depth, rotation showed a marginal increment of SOC stock with respect to soybean monocropping. The increased surface SOC content in the rotation positively affected the POM-C content and macro-aggregation. However, soil structural stability showed a tendency to be higher in the monocropping,especially at a depth of 5–20 cm. Overall, crop rotation demonstrated potential for enhanced carbon sequestration in temperate agroecosystems within three years, despite not significantly improving soil structural stability.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242563
Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Cosentino, Diego; Semmartin, María Gisela; A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina); Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 375; 7-2024; 1-8
0167-8809
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242563
identifier_str_mv Urrutia Larrachea, Idoia; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Cosentino, Diego; Semmartin, María Gisela; A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock and soil aggregation in two crop sequences in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina); Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 375; 7-2024; 1-8
0167-8809
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109183
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109183
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1843606786462973952
score 13.001348

Publicaciones similares