No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the lo...

Autores
Simpson, Zachary P.; Jordahl, Jim; Leptin, Andrea; Miguez, Fernando E.; Niemi, Jarad; Schulte, Lisa A.; Thompson, Michael L.; Villarino, Sebastián Horacio; McDaniel, Marshall D.
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Cai et al. (2022) presented a meta-analysis of how no-tillage (NT) practices, in comparison to a conventional tillage (CT) practice, affect soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. They concluded that NT, relative to CT, increased SOC only in the upper soil depth (0–10 cm) but reduced SOC in some deeper layers, leading to an overall net decrease of SOC across the profile (up to 60 cm deep; average of −0.24 Mg C ha−1). As researchers interested in how agricultural conservation practices, such as NT or reduced tillage, can improve ecosystem services like soil carbon storage, we were surprised by these results: several past meta-analyses on the same topic arrived at opposite conclusions (e.g., Meurer et al., 2018, Nicoloso and Rice, 2021, West and Post, 2002). After re-analysis of the data presented by Cai et al. (2022), we found that the data do not support the authors’ conclusions but rather show support for NT as preferable to CT as a SOC storage practice.
Fil: Simpson, Zachary P.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . Soil Management and Sugar Beet Research Unit; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jordahl, Jim. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Leptin, Andrea. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research; Estados Unidos
Fil: Miguez, Fernando E.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Niemi, Jarad. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Schulte, Lisa A.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Thompson, Michael L.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Villarino, Sebastián Horacio. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: McDaniel, Marshall D.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Materia
No-till
Soil organic matter
Carbon sequestration
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218384
Acceder
id CONICETDig_c885d5fb0ee759613528f34c7abe2ee7
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218384
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.Simpson, Zachary P.Jordahl, JimLeptin, AndreaMiguez, Fernando E.Niemi, JaradSchulte, Lisa A.Thompson, Michael L.Villarino, Sebastián HoracioMcDaniel, Marshall D.No-tillSoil organic matterCarbon sequestrationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Cai et al. (2022) presented a meta-analysis of how no-tillage (NT) practices, in comparison to a conventional tillage (CT) practice, affect soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. They concluded that NT, relative to CT, increased SOC only in the upper soil depth (0–10 cm) but reduced SOC in some deeper layers, leading to an overall net decrease of SOC across the profile (up to 60 cm deep; average of −0.24 Mg C ha−1). As researchers interested in how agricultural conservation practices, such as NT or reduced tillage, can improve ecosystem services like soil carbon storage, we were surprised by these results: several past meta-analyses on the same topic arrived at opposite conclusions (e.g., Meurer et al., 2018, Nicoloso and Rice, 2021, West and Post, 2002). After re-analysis of the data presented by Cai et al. (2022), we found that the data do not support the authors’ conclusions but rather show support for NT as preferable to CT as a SOC storage practice.Fil: Simpson, Zachary P.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . Soil Management and Sugar Beet Research Unit; Estados UnidosFil: Jordahl, Jim. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);Fil: Leptin, Andrea. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research; Estados UnidosFil: Miguez, Fernando E.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);Fil: Niemi, Jarad. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);Fil: Schulte, Lisa A.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);Fil: Thompson, Michael L.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);Fil: Villarino, Sebastián Horacio. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: McDaniel, Marshall D.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);Elsevier Science2023-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/218384Simpson, Zachary P.; Jordahl, Jim; Leptin, Andrea; Miguez, Fernando E.; Niemi, Jarad; et al.; No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 430; 116307; 2-2023; 1-30016-7061CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706122006140info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116307info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:22:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/218384instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:22:36.021CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
title No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
spellingShingle No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
Simpson, Zachary P.
No-till
Soil organic matter
Carbon sequestration
title_short No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
title_full No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
title_fullStr No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
title_full_unstemmed No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
title_sort No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Simpson, Zachary P.
Jordahl, Jim
Leptin, Andrea
Miguez, Fernando E.
Niemi, Jarad
Schulte, Lisa A.
Thompson, Michael L.
Villarino, Sebastián Horacio
McDaniel, Marshall D.
author Simpson, Zachary P.
author_facet Simpson, Zachary P.
Jordahl, Jim
Leptin, Andrea
Miguez, Fernando E.
Niemi, Jarad
Schulte, Lisa A.
Thompson, Michael L.
Villarino, Sebastián Horacio
McDaniel, Marshall D.
author_role author
author2 Jordahl, Jim
Leptin, Andrea
Miguez, Fernando E.
Niemi, Jarad
Schulte, Lisa A.
Thompson, Michael L.
Villarino, Sebastián Horacio
McDaniel, Marshall D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv No-till
Soil organic matter
Carbon sequestration
topic No-till
Soil organic matter
Carbon sequestration
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Cai et al. (2022) presented a meta-analysis of how no-tillage (NT) practices, in comparison to a conventional tillage (CT) practice, affect soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. They concluded that NT, relative to CT, increased SOC only in the upper soil depth (0–10 cm) but reduced SOC in some deeper layers, leading to an overall net decrease of SOC across the profile (up to 60 cm deep; average of −0.24 Mg C ha−1). As researchers interested in how agricultural conservation practices, such as NT or reduced tillage, can improve ecosystem services like soil carbon storage, we were surprised by these results: several past meta-analyses on the same topic arrived at opposite conclusions (e.g., Meurer et al., 2018, Nicoloso and Rice, 2021, West and Post, 2002). After re-analysis of the data presented by Cai et al. (2022), we found that the data do not support the authors’ conclusions but rather show support for NT as preferable to CT as a SOC storage practice.
Fil: Simpson, Zachary P.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . Soil Management and Sugar Beet Research Unit; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jordahl, Jim. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Leptin, Andrea. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research; Estados Unidos
Fil: Miguez, Fernando E.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Niemi, Jarad. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Schulte, Lisa A.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Thompson, Michael L.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
Fil: Villarino, Sebastián Horacio. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU); . Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: McDaniel, Marshall D.. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (ISU);
description Cai et al. (2022) presented a meta-analysis of how no-tillage (NT) practices, in comparison to a conventional tillage (CT) practice, affect soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. They concluded that NT, relative to CT, increased SOC only in the upper soil depth (0–10 cm) but reduced SOC in some deeper layers, leading to an overall net decrease of SOC across the profile (up to 60 cm deep; average of −0.24 Mg C ha−1). As researchers interested in how agricultural conservation practices, such as NT or reduced tillage, can improve ecosystem services like soil carbon storage, we were surprised by these results: several past meta-analyses on the same topic arrived at opposite conclusions (e.g., Meurer et al., 2018, Nicoloso and Rice, 2021, West and Post, 2002). After re-analysis of the data presented by Cai et al. (2022), we found that the data do not support the authors’ conclusions but rather show support for NT as preferable to CT as a SOC storage practice.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218384
Simpson, Zachary P.; Jordahl, Jim; Leptin, Andrea; Miguez, Fernando E.; Niemi, Jarad; et al.; No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 430; 116307; 2-2023; 1-3
0016-7061
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/218384
identifier_str_mv Simpson, Zachary P.; Jordahl, Jim; Leptin, Andrea; Miguez, Fernando E.; Niemi, Jarad; et al.; No-tillage does not on average reduce soil carbon storage compared to conventional tillage. Comment on “Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run” by Cai et al.; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 430; 116307; 2-2023; 1-3
0016-7061
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706122006140
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116307
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842981244052176896
score 12.48226

Publicaciones similares