Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model
- Autores
- Maffione, Nicolás Pablo; Darriba, Luciano Ariel; Cincotta, Pablo Miguel; Giordano, Claudia Marcela
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Together with the variational indicators of chaos, the spectral analysis methods have also achieved great popularity in the field of chaos detection. The former are based on the concept of local exponential divergence. The latter are based on the numerical analysis of some particular quantities of a single orbit, e.g. its frequency. In spite of having totally different conceptual bases, they are used for the very same goals such as, for instance, separating the chaotic and the regular components. In fact, we show herein that the variational indicators serve to distinguish both components of a Hamiltonian system in a more reliable fashion than a spectral analysis method does. We study two start spaces for different energy levels of a self-consistent triaxial stellar dynamical model by means of some selected variational indicators and a spectral analysis method. In order to select the appropriate tools for this paper, we extend previous studies where we make a comparison of several variational indicators on different scenarios. Herein, we compare the average power-law exponent (APLE) and an alternative quantity given by the mean exponential growth factor of nearby orbits (MEGNO): the MEGNO's slope estimation of the largest Lyapunov characteristic exponent (SElLCE). The spectral analysis method selected for the investigation is the frequency modified Fourier transform (FMFT). Besides a comparative study of the APLE, the fast Lyapunov indicator (FLI), the orthogonal fast Lyapunov indicator (OFLI) and theMEGNO/SElLCE, we show that the SElLCE could be an appropriate alternative to the MEGNO when studying large samples of initial conditions. The SElLCE separates the chaotic and the regular components reliably and identifies the different levels of chaoticity. We show that the FMFT is not as reliable as the SElLCE to describe clearly the chaotic domains in the experiments. We use the latter indicator as the main variational indicator to analyse the phase space portraits of the model under study.
Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas
Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata - Materia
-
Ciencias Astronómicas
Kinematics and dynamics
Methods
Numerical-Galaxies - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/85418
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_ed7c212c40cb544fc1a2fcd99491bd93 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/85418 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial modelMaffione, Nicolás PabloDarriba, Luciano ArielCincotta, Pablo MiguelGiordano, Claudia MarcelaCiencias AstronómicasKinematics and dynamicsMethodsNumerical-GalaxiesTogether with the variational indicators of chaos, the spectral analysis methods have also achieved great popularity in the field of chaos detection. The former are based on the concept of local exponential divergence. The latter are based on the numerical analysis of some particular quantities of a single orbit, e.g. its frequency. In spite of having totally different conceptual bases, they are used for the very same goals such as, for instance, separating the chaotic and the regular components. In fact, we show herein that the variational indicators serve to distinguish both components of a Hamiltonian system in a more reliable fashion than a spectral analysis method does. We study two start spaces for different energy levels of a self-consistent triaxial stellar dynamical model by means of some selected variational indicators and a spectral analysis method. In order to select the appropriate tools for this paper, we extend previous studies where we make a comparison of several variational indicators on different scenarios. Herein, we compare the average power-law exponent (APLE) and an alternative quantity given by the mean exponential growth factor of nearby orbits (MEGNO): the MEGNO's slope estimation of the largest Lyapunov characteristic exponent (SElLCE). The spectral analysis method selected for the investigation is the frequency modified Fourier transform (FMFT). Besides a comparative study of the APLE, the fast Lyapunov indicator (FLI), the orthogonal fast Lyapunov indicator (OFLI) and theMEGNO/SElLCE, we show that the SElLCE could be an appropriate alternative to the MEGNO when studying large samples of initial conditions. The SElLCE separates the chaotic and the regular components reliably and identifies the different levels of chaoticity. We show that the FMFT is not as reliable as the SElLCE to describe clearly the chaotic domains in the experiments. We use the latter indicator as the main variational indicator to analyse the phase space portraits of the model under study.Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y GeofísicasInstituto de Astrofísica de La Plata2013info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf2700-2717http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/85418enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0035-8711info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/sts539info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:16:30Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/85418Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:16:31.139SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model |
title |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model |
spellingShingle |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model Maffione, Nicolás Pablo Ciencias Astronómicas Kinematics and dynamics Methods Numerical-Galaxies |
title_short |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model |
title_full |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model |
title_fullStr |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model |
title_sort |
Chaos detection tools: application to a self-consistent triaxial model |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Maffione, Nicolás Pablo Darriba, Luciano Ariel Cincotta, Pablo Miguel Giordano, Claudia Marcela |
author |
Maffione, Nicolás Pablo |
author_facet |
Maffione, Nicolás Pablo Darriba, Luciano Ariel Cincotta, Pablo Miguel Giordano, Claudia Marcela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Darriba, Luciano Ariel Cincotta, Pablo Miguel Giordano, Claudia Marcela |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Astronómicas Kinematics and dynamics Methods Numerical-Galaxies |
topic |
Ciencias Astronómicas Kinematics and dynamics Methods Numerical-Galaxies |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Together with the variational indicators of chaos, the spectral analysis methods have also achieved great popularity in the field of chaos detection. The former are based on the concept of local exponential divergence. The latter are based on the numerical analysis of some particular quantities of a single orbit, e.g. its frequency. In spite of having totally different conceptual bases, they are used for the very same goals such as, for instance, separating the chaotic and the regular components. In fact, we show herein that the variational indicators serve to distinguish both components of a Hamiltonian system in a more reliable fashion than a spectral analysis method does. We study two start spaces for different energy levels of a self-consistent triaxial stellar dynamical model by means of some selected variational indicators and a spectral analysis method. In order to select the appropriate tools for this paper, we extend previous studies where we make a comparison of several variational indicators on different scenarios. Herein, we compare the average power-law exponent (APLE) and an alternative quantity given by the mean exponential growth factor of nearby orbits (MEGNO): the MEGNO's slope estimation of the largest Lyapunov characteristic exponent (SElLCE). The spectral analysis method selected for the investigation is the frequency modified Fourier transform (FMFT). Besides a comparative study of the APLE, the fast Lyapunov indicator (FLI), the orthogonal fast Lyapunov indicator (OFLI) and theMEGNO/SElLCE, we show that the SElLCE could be an appropriate alternative to the MEGNO when studying large samples of initial conditions. The SElLCE separates the chaotic and the regular components reliably and identifies the different levels of chaoticity. We show that the FMFT is not as reliable as the SElLCE to describe clearly the chaotic domains in the experiments. We use the latter indicator as the main variational indicator to analyse the phase space portraits of the model under study. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata |
description |
Together with the variational indicators of chaos, the spectral analysis methods have also achieved great popularity in the field of chaos detection. The former are based on the concept of local exponential divergence. The latter are based on the numerical analysis of some particular quantities of a single orbit, e.g. its frequency. In spite of having totally different conceptual bases, they are used for the very same goals such as, for instance, separating the chaotic and the regular components. In fact, we show herein that the variational indicators serve to distinguish both components of a Hamiltonian system in a more reliable fashion than a spectral analysis method does. We study two start spaces for different energy levels of a self-consistent triaxial stellar dynamical model by means of some selected variational indicators and a spectral analysis method. In order to select the appropriate tools for this paper, we extend previous studies where we make a comparison of several variational indicators on different scenarios. Herein, we compare the average power-law exponent (APLE) and an alternative quantity given by the mean exponential growth factor of nearby orbits (MEGNO): the MEGNO's slope estimation of the largest Lyapunov characteristic exponent (SElLCE). The spectral analysis method selected for the investigation is the frequency modified Fourier transform (FMFT). Besides a comparative study of the APLE, the fast Lyapunov indicator (FLI), the orthogonal fast Lyapunov indicator (OFLI) and theMEGNO/SElLCE, we show that the SElLCE could be an appropriate alternative to the MEGNO when studying large samples of initial conditions. The SElLCE separates the chaotic and the regular components reliably and identifies the different levels of chaoticity. We show that the FMFT is not as reliable as the SElLCE to describe clearly the chaotic domains in the experiments. We use the latter indicator as the main variational indicator to analyse the phase space portraits of the model under study. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/85418 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/85418 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0035-8711 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/sts539 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 2700-2717 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844616037976244224 |
score |
13.070432 |