Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods

Autores
Cellerino, Karina; Binaghi, María Julieta; Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa; Docena, Guillermo Horacio; López, Laura Beatriz
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination.
Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune
Materia
Química
Allergens
Elisa
Dot blot
Immunoblotting
Meat products
Milk
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99853

id SEDICI_d23de8df5c97e0aa60a90e3b8cd84c7c
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99853
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal MethodsCellerino, KarinaBinaghi, María JulietaCagnasso, Carolina ElisaDocena, Guillermo HoracioLópez, Laura BeatrizQuímicaAllergensElisaDot blotImmunoblottingMeat productsMilkThe aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination.Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune2014-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf236-242http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99853enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/36323info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2330-7285info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/36323info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11648/j.jfns.20140205.16info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-10T12:23:39Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99853Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-10 12:23:39.778SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
title Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
spellingShingle Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
Cellerino, Karina
Química
Allergens
Elisa
Dot blot
Immunoblotting
Meat products
Milk
title_short Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
title_full Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
title_fullStr Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
title_full_unstemmed Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
title_sort Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cellerino, Karina
Binaghi, María Julieta
Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa
Docena, Guillermo Horacio
López, Laura Beatriz
author Cellerino, Karina
author_facet Cellerino, Karina
Binaghi, María Julieta
Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa
Docena, Guillermo Horacio
López, Laura Beatriz
author_role author
author2 Binaghi, María Julieta
Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa
Docena, Guillermo Horacio
López, Laura Beatriz
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Química
Allergens
Elisa
Dot blot
Immunoblotting
Meat products
Milk
topic Química
Allergens
Elisa
Dot blot
Immunoblotting
Meat products
Milk
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination.
Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune
description The aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99853
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99853
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/36323
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2330-7285
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/36323
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11648/j.jfns.20140205.16
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
236-242
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842904265520054272
score 12.993085