Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods
- Autores
- Cellerino, Karina; Binaghi, María Julieta; Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa; Docena, Guillermo Horacio; López, Laura Beatriz
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination.
Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune - Materia
-
Química
Allergens
Elisa
Dot blot
Immunoblotting
Meat products
Milk - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99853
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_d23de8df5c97e0aa60a90e3b8cd84c7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99853 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal MethodsCellerino, KarinaBinaghi, María JulietaCagnasso, Carolina ElisaDocena, Guillermo HoracioLópez, Laura BeatrizQuímicaAllergensElisaDot blotImmunoblottingMeat productsMilkThe aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination.Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune2014-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf236-242http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99853enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/36323info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2330-7285info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/36323info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11648/j.jfns.20140205.16info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-10T12:23:39Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99853Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-10 12:23:39.778SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods |
title |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods |
spellingShingle |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods Cellerino, Karina Química Allergens Elisa Dot blot Immunoblotting Meat products Milk |
title_short |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods |
title_full |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods |
title_fullStr |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods |
title_sort |
Milk Protein Detection in Raw and Cooked Meat Products Using Immunochemichal Methods |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cellerino, Karina Binaghi, María Julieta Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa Docena, Guillermo Horacio López, Laura Beatriz |
author |
Cellerino, Karina |
author_facet |
Cellerino, Karina Binaghi, María Julieta Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa Docena, Guillermo Horacio López, Laura Beatriz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Binaghi, María Julieta Cagnasso, Carolina Elisa Docena, Guillermo Horacio López, Laura Beatriz |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Química Allergens Elisa Dot blot Immunoblotting Meat products Milk |
topic |
Química Allergens Elisa Dot blot Immunoblotting Meat products Milk |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination. Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate different immunochemical methods (Dot Blot, Immnoblotting and two different ELISA kits) for the detection of milk proteins in eleven raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0 – 5000 ppm of powder deffated milk (PDM) and in nine raw and cooked model systems of meat products with 0-2000 ppm of dry whey (DW) and in eleven commercial meat products. All the samples were analysed with Dot Blot and Immunoblotting with specific polyclonal rabbit serum against milk proteins and with two ELISA kits: Veratox® Total Milk Allergen Quantitative Test from Neogen and Ridascreen® Fast Milk from R-Biopharm. ELISA methods are more sensitive for the detection of milk proteins than Dot Blot and Immunoblotting. The R-Biopharm kit was the most sensitive kit for the analysis of these samples. However Immunoblotting can be useful for the detection of milk proteins if it is suspected that they were added as ingredients or additives. Immunoblotting allows to verify the presence of caseins and / or β-lactoglobulin. In contrast, the use of an ELISA kit is more appropriate to verify a possible cross-contamination. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99853 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99853 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/36323 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2330-7285 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/36323 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11648/j.jfns.20140205.16 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 236-242 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842904265520054272 |
score |
12.993085 |