Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks
- Autores
- Martínez, Diego C.; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
- Año de publicación
- 2006
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades with the addition of Argument-Based Reasoning Systems. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict or defeat relation, and a preference relation on the arguments involved in this conflict. The research activities are centered in our abstract framework for argumentation, where two kinds of defeat are present, depending on the outcome of the preference relation. This framework also takes subarguments into account, leading to the formalization of well formed argumentation lines.
Eje: Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Intelligent agents
Frameworks
artificial intelligence
abstract argumentation
dialogues - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20738
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
SEDICI_c0eeb4183ef7062ade7f42746caaaa58 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20738 |
| network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
| repository_id_str |
1329 |
| network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| spelling |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworksMartínez, Diego C.García, Alejandro JavierSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasIntelligent agentsFrameworksartificial intelligenceabstract argumentationdialoguesThe area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades with the addition of Argument-Based Reasoning Systems. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict or defeat relation, and a preference relation on the arguments involved in this conflict. The research activities are centered in our abstract framework for argumentation, where two kinds of defeat are present, depending on the outcome of the preference relation. This framework also takes subarguments into account, leading to the formalization of well formed argumentation lines.Eje: Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2006-06info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20738enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-9474-35-5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-11-05T12:34:17Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20738Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-11-05 12:34:17.431SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks |
| title |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks |
| spellingShingle |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks Martínez, Diego C. Ciencias Informáticas Intelligent agents Frameworks artificial intelligence abstract argumentation dialogues |
| title_short |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks |
| title_full |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks |
| title_fullStr |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks |
| title_sort |
Defining the structure of well-formed argumentation lines in abstract frameworks |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Martínez, Diego C. García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author |
Martínez, Diego C. |
| author_facet |
Martínez, Diego C. García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Intelligent agents Frameworks artificial intelligence abstract argumentation dialogues |
| topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Intelligent agents Frameworks artificial intelligence abstract argumentation dialogues |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades with the addition of Argument-Based Reasoning Systems. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict or defeat relation, and a preference relation on the arguments involved in this conflict. The research activities are centered in our abstract framework for argumentation, where two kinds of defeat are present, depending on the outcome of the preference relation. This framework also takes subarguments into account, leading to the formalization of well formed argumentation lines. Eje: Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
| description |
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades with the addition of Argument-Based Reasoning Systems. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict or defeat relation, and a preference relation on the arguments involved in this conflict. The research activities are centered in our abstract framework for argumentation, where two kinds of defeat are present, depending on the outcome of the preference relation. This framework also takes subarguments into account, leading to the formalization of well formed argumentation lines. |
| publishDate |
2006 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-06 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20738 |
| url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20738 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-9474-35-5 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
| reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| instacron_str |
UNLP |
| institution |
UNLP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
| _version_ |
1847978356635598848 |
| score |
13.084122 |