Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Autores
- Martínez, Diego C.; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
- Año de publicación
- 2005
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspecified, usually the structure of arguments. In the dialectical process carried out to identify accepted arguments in the system, some controversial situations may be found, related to the reintroduction of arguments in this process, causing a circularity that must be treated in order to avoid an infinite analysis. Some systems apply a single restriction to argumentation lines: no previously considered argument is reintroduced in the process. In this work we show that a more specific restriction need to be applied, taking subarguments into account. We finally present a new definition of acceptable argumentation lines
VI Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
abstract argumentation systems
acceptable argumentation lines - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22961
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_6dfcda252c87b865e84662dad08bf21f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22961 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworksMartínez, Diego C.García, Alejandro JavierSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias Informáticasabstract argumentation systemsacceptable argumentation linesAbstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspecified, usually the structure of arguments. In the dialectical process carried out to identify accepted arguments in the system, some controversial situations may be found, related to the reintroduction of arguments in this process, causing a circularity that must be treated in order to avoid an infinite analysis. Some systems apply a single restriction to argumentation lines: no previously considered argument is reintroduced in the process. In this work we show that a more specific restriction need to be applied, taking subarguments into account. We finally present a new definition of acceptable argumentation linesVI Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2005-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22961enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:28:03Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22961Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:28:03.587SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks |
title |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks |
spellingShingle |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks Martínez, Diego C. Ciencias Informáticas abstract argumentation systems acceptable argumentation lines |
title_short |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks |
title_full |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks |
title_fullStr |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks |
title_sort |
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Martínez, Diego C. García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author |
Martínez, Diego C. |
author_facet |
Martínez, Diego C. García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas abstract argumentation systems acceptable argumentation lines |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas abstract argumentation systems acceptable argumentation lines |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspecified, usually the structure of arguments. In the dialectical process carried out to identify accepted arguments in the system, some controversial situations may be found, related to the reintroduction of arguments in this process, causing a circularity that must be treated in order to avoid an infinite analysis. Some systems apply a single restriction to argumentation lines: no previously considered argument is reintroduced in the process. In this work we show that a more specific restriction need to be applied, taking subarguments into account. We finally present a new definition of acceptable argumentation lines VI Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI) Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspecified, usually the structure of arguments. In the dialectical process carried out to identify accepted arguments in the system, some controversial situations may be found, related to the reintroduction of arguments in this process, causing a circularity that must be treated in order to avoid an infinite analysis. Some systems apply a single restriction to argumentation lines: no previously considered argument is reintroduced in the process. In this work we show that a more specific restriction need to be applied, taking subarguments into account. We finally present a new definition of acceptable argumentation lines |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22961 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22961 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842260119264428032 |
score |
13.13397 |