An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters
- Autores
- Martínez, Diego C.; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
- Año de publicación
- 2004
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preference order. We present a framework for argumentation where two kinds of defeat relation are present, depending on the outcome of a preference function. An argument A is a proper defeater of B, if both arguments are in conflict, and A is preferred to B according to. A is a blocking defeater of B, if they are in conflict and both arguments are incomparable or indistinguishable. We define a function to caracterize the set of accepted argument in the framework. This function also provide a method for identifying controversial situations.
Eje: V - Workshop de agentes y sistemas inteligentes
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Intelligent agents
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frameworks
abstract argumentation
proper
blocking defeaters - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22504
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
SEDICI_c015a890330c3d1a5fa98aa9a36552f4 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22504 |
| network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
| repository_id_str |
1329 |
| network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| spelling |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeatersMartínez, Diego C.García, Alejandro JavierSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasIntelligent agentsARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEFrameworksabstract argumentationproperblocking defeatersDefeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preference order. We present a framework for argumentation where two kinds of defeat relation are present, depending on the outcome of a preference function. An argument A is a proper defeater of B, if both arguments are in conflict, and A is preferred to B according to. A is a blocking defeater of B, if they are in conflict and both arguments are incomparable or indistinguishable. We define a function to caracterize the set of accepted argument in the framework. This function also provide a method for identifying controversial situations.Eje: V - Workshop de agentes y sistemas inteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2004info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22504enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T10:47:42Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22504Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 10:47:42.929SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters |
| title |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters |
| spellingShingle |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters Martínez, Diego C. Ciencias Informáticas Intelligent agents ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frameworks abstract argumentation proper blocking defeaters |
| title_short |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters |
| title_full |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters |
| title_fullStr |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters |
| title_full_unstemmed |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters |
| title_sort |
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Martínez, Diego C. García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author |
Martínez, Diego C. |
| author_facet |
Martínez, Diego C. García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Intelligent agents ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frameworks abstract argumentation proper blocking defeaters |
| topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Intelligent agents ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frameworks abstract argumentation proper blocking defeaters |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preference order. We present a framework for argumentation where two kinds of defeat relation are present, depending on the outcome of a preference function. An argument A is a proper defeater of B, if both arguments are in conflict, and A is preferred to B according to. A is a blocking defeater of B, if they are in conflict and both arguments are incomparable or indistinguishable. We define a function to caracterize the set of accepted argument in the framework. This function also provide a method for identifying controversial situations. Eje: V - Workshop de agentes y sistemas inteligentes Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
| description |
Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preference order. We present a framework for argumentation where two kinds of defeat relation are present, depending on the outcome of a preference function. An argument A is a proper defeater of B, if both arguments are in conflict, and A is preferred to B according to. A is a blocking defeater of B, if they are in conflict and both arguments are incomparable or indistinguishable. We define a function to caracterize the set of accepted argument in the framework. This function also provide a method for identifying controversial situations. |
| publishDate |
2004 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22504 |
| url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22504 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
| reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| instacron_str |
UNLP |
| institution |
UNLP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
| _version_ |
1846063903387156480 |
| score |
13.22299 |