An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting

Autores
Cohen, Andrea; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a more concrete approach to represent argumentative or non-monotonic scenarios where information can be attacked and supported
Presentado en el XII Workshop Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/18573
Acceder
id SEDICI_2cbeede1e93cdb45aca57e2fad29cb88
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/18573
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling An argumentation framework with backing and undercuttingCohen, AndreaGarcía, Alejandro JavierSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasFrameworksabstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a more concrete approach to represent argumentative or non-monotonic scenarios where information can be attacked and supportedPresentado en el XII Workshop Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2011-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf21-30http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-17T09:36:58Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/18573Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-17 09:36:58.553SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
spellingShingle An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
Cohen, Andrea
Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
title_short An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_full An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_fullStr An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_full_unstemmed An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_sort An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cohen, Andrea
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Cohen, Andrea
author_facet Cohen, Andrea
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a more concrete approach to represent argumentative or non-monotonic scenarios where information can be attacked and supported
Presentado en el XII Workshop Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a more concrete approach to represent argumentative or non-monotonic scenarios where information can be attacked and supported
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
21-30
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1843532019088228352
score 13.001348

Publicaciones similares