A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
- Autores
- Budán, Paola D.; Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed.
Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23615
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_b3d09b1af14210f9da6465b294292e9f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23615 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinionBudán, Paola D.Budán, Maximiliano Celmo DavidSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasFrameworksIntelligent agentsPreliminary Study of ArgumentationExpert OpinionThe research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed.Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2012-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:55:31Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23615Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:55:31.704SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion |
title |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion |
spellingShingle |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion Budán, Paola D. Ciencias Informáticas Frameworks Intelligent agents Preliminary Study of Argumentation Expert Opinion |
title_short |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion |
title_full |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion |
title_fullStr |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion |
title_full_unstemmed |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion |
title_sort |
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Budán, Paola D. Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author |
Budán, Paola D. |
author_facet |
Budán, Paola D. Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Frameworks Intelligent agents Preliminary Study of Argumentation Expert Opinion |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Frameworks Intelligent agents Preliminary Study of Argumentation Expert Opinion |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed. Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI) Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844615814426132480 |
score |
13.070432 |