A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion

Autores
Budán, Paola D.; Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed.
Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23615

id SEDICI_b3d09b1af14210f9da6465b294292e9f
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23615
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinionBudán, Paola D.Budán, Maximiliano Celmo DavidSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasFrameworksIntelligent agentsPreliminary Study of ArgumentationExpert OpinionThe research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed.Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2012-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:55:31Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23615Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:55:31.704SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
spellingShingle A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
Budán, Paola D.
Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
title_short A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_full A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_fullStr A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_full_unstemmed A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_sort A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Budán, Paola D.
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Budán, Paola D.
author_facet Budán, Paola D.
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed.
Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844615814426132480
score 13.070432