Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering
- Autores
- Pons, Claudia; Esterkin, Viviana
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Model-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2.
Laboratorio de Investigación y Formación en Informática Avanzada - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Capability Maturity Model
CMMI-DEV 1.3
Model-driven engineering (MDE)
Quality assessment - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/119010
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_b00567d0b45844e8a1f50240a867992b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/119010 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software EngineeringPons, ClaudiaEsterkin, VivianaCiencias InformáticasCapability Maturity ModelCMMI-DEV 1.3Model-driven engineering (MDE)Quality assessmentModel-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2.Laboratorio de Investigación y Formación en Informática Avanzada2018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf33-45http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/119010enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1522-0540info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11746/10650info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-17T10:10:48Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/119010Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-17 10:10:48.412SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
spellingShingle |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering Pons, Claudia Ciencias Informáticas Capability Maturity Model CMMI-DEV 1.3 Model-driven engineering (MDE) Quality assessment |
title_short |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_full |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_fullStr |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_sort |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pons, Claudia Esterkin, Viviana |
author |
Pons, Claudia |
author_facet |
Pons, Claudia Esterkin, Viviana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Esterkin, Viviana |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Capability Maturity Model CMMI-DEV 1.3 Model-driven engineering (MDE) Quality assessment |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Capability Maturity Model CMMI-DEV 1.3 Model-driven engineering (MDE) Quality assessment |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Model-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. Laboratorio de Investigación y Formación en Informática Avanzada |
description |
Model-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/119010 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/119010 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1522-0540 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11746/10650 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 33-45 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1843532705435746304 |
score |
13.001348 |