Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering
- Autores
- Pons, Claudia Fabiana; Esterkin, Viviana
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión enviada
- Descripción
- Model-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2.
- Materia
-
Ingenierías y Tecnologías
Capability Maturity Model
CMMI-DEV 1.3
model-driven engineering (MDE)
quality assessment - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
- OAI Identificador
- oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/10650
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CICBA_28590e19fa877b7000bba08f48cb6a1c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/10650 |
network_acronym_str |
CICBA |
repository_id_str |
9441 |
network_name_str |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
spelling |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software EngineeringPons, Claudia FabianaEsterkin, VivianaIngenierías y TecnologíasCapability Maturity ModelCMMI-DEV 1.3model-driven engineering (MDE)quality assessmentModel-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2.2018-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/10650spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA)instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesinstacron:CICBA2025-09-18T10:04:44Zoai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/10650Institucionalhttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.arOrganismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/oai/snrdmarisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:94412025-09-18 10:04:44.611CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
spellingShingle |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering Pons, Claudia Fabiana Ingenierías y Tecnologías Capability Maturity Model CMMI-DEV 1.3 model-driven engineering (MDE) quality assessment |
title_short |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_full |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_fullStr |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
title_sort |
Certifying CMMI-DEV in the Context of Model-Driven Software Engineering |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pons, Claudia Fabiana Esterkin, Viviana |
author |
Pons, Claudia Fabiana |
author_facet |
Pons, Claudia Fabiana Esterkin, Viviana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Esterkin, Viviana |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ingenierías y Tecnologías Capability Maturity Model CMMI-DEV 1.3 model-driven engineering (MDE) quality assessment |
topic |
Ingenierías y Tecnologías Capability Maturity Model CMMI-DEV 1.3 model-driven engineering (MDE) quality assessment |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Model-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. |
description |
Model-driven software engineering (MDE) is being positioned as an alternative to conventional methods of software production. Given that MDE is an emerging paradigm, standards for measuring its quality have not yet been established. This article analyzes MDE good practices and how they relate to CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. MDE best practices were assessed to determine whether they support each CMMI Level 2 specific practice in seven of the 22 process areas: configuration management, supplier agreement management, requirement management, process and product quality assurance, measurement and analysis, project monitoring and control, and project planning. An expert panel of five software engineering professionals offered consulting services to provide an initial evaluation of the results. For each process area, the percentage of practices supported by MDE was determined and recommendations to enhance MDE support were identified. Although further research is needed, this suggests that an organization that uses MDE can certify at CMMI-DEV 1.3 Level 2. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
submittedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/10650 |
url |
https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/10650 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA) instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires instacron:CICBA |
reponame_str |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
collection |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
instname_str |
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires |
instacron_str |
CICBA |
institution |
CICBA |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
marisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1843608571031322624 |
score |
13.001348 |