Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses

Autores
Díaz Legaspe, Justina
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
Materia
Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/102508
Acceder
id SEDICI_83e9c0a663f7431738ab381de61faa69
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/102508
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discoursesDíaz Legaspe, JustinaFilosofíaDisagreementsEvaluative expressiosLewisConversational dynamicsWhy would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación2015-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf211-226http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/102508enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/50514info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2317-630Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/50514info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1590/0100-6045.2015.V38N2.JDLinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:20:56Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/102508Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:20:56.756SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
spellingShingle Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
Díaz Legaspe, Justina
Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
title_short Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_full Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_fullStr Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_full_unstemmed Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_sort Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author_facet Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
topic Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
description Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/102508
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/102508
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/50514
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2317-630X
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/50514
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1590/0100-6045.2015.V38N2.JDL
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
211-226
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616084589641728
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares