Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses

Autores
Díaz Legaspe, Justina
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
Fil: Díaz Legaspe, Justina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.
Fuente
Manuscrito, 38(2), 39-63. (2015)
ISSN 2317-630X
Materia
Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
OAI Identificador
oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr13416
Acceder
id MemAca_f621e0fd6799d16c5446b726f96d7667
oai_identifier_str oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr13416
network_acronym_str MemAca
repository_id_str 1341
network_name_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
spelling Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discoursesDíaz Legaspe, JustinaFilosofíaDisagreementsEvaluative expressiosLewisConversational dynamicsWhy would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.Fil: Díaz Legaspe, Justina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.2015info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13416/pr.13416.pdfManuscrito, 38(2), 39-63. (2015)ISSN 2317-630Xreponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educacióninstacron:UNLPenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/10915/102508info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2025-09-29T11:55:00Zoai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr13416Institucionalhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicahttps://www.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/oaiserver.cgimemoria@fahce.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13412025-09-29 11:55:01.715Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educaciónfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
spellingShingle Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
Díaz Legaspe, Justina
Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
title_short Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_full Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_fullStr Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_full_unstemmed Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_sort Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author_facet Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
topic Filosofía
Disagreements
Evaluative expressios
Lewis
Conversational dynamics
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
Fil: Díaz Legaspe, Justina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.
description Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13416/pr.13416.pdf
url https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13416/pr.13416.pdf
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/10915/102508
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito, 38(2), 39-63. (2015)
ISSN 2317-630X
reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
collection Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
repository.mail.fl_str_mv memoria@fahce.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616499897040896
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares