Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses

Autores
Diaz Legaspe, Justina
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
Fil: Diaz Legaspe, Justina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
DISAGREEMENTS
EVALUATIVE EXPRESSIOS
LEWIS
CONVERSATIONAL DYNAMICS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50514
Acceder
id CONICETDig_e28a18b433726c8bacbc07fbe5d7fa21
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50514
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discoursesDiaz Legaspe, JustinaDISAGREEMENTSEVALUATIVE EXPRESSIOSLEWISCONVERSATIONAL DYNAMICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.Fil: Diaz Legaspe, Justina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas. Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2015-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/50514Diaz Legaspe, Justina; Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência; Manuscrito; 38; 2; 9-2015; 211-2260100-60452317-630XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/ch8rtpinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:26:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50514instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:26:42.016CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
spellingShingle Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
Diaz Legaspe, Justina
DISAGREEMENTS
EVALUATIVE EXPRESSIOS
LEWIS
CONVERSATIONAL DYNAMICS
title_short Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_full Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_fullStr Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_full_unstemmed Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
title_sort Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Diaz Legaspe, Justina
author Diaz Legaspe, Justina
author_facet Diaz Legaspe, Justina
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DISAGREEMENTS
EVALUATIVE EXPRESSIOS
LEWIS
CONVERSATIONAL DYNAMICS
topic DISAGREEMENTS
EVALUATIVE EXPRESSIOS
LEWIS
CONVERSATIONAL DYNAMICS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
Fil: Diaz Legaspe, Justina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/50514
Diaz Legaspe, Justina; Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência; Manuscrito; 38; 2; 9-2015; 211-226
0100-6045
2317-630X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/50514
identifier_str_mv Diaz Legaspe, Justina; Disagreeing over evaluatives: preference, normative and moral discourses; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência; Manuscrito; 38; 2; 9-2015; 211-226
0100-6045
2317-630X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/ch8rtp
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614268487467008
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares