How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study
- Autores
- Raverta, Claudio Marco; Grigera, Julián; Gardey, Juan Cruz; Garrido, Alejandra
- Año de publicación
- 2026
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The concept of UX smells has been recently studied as a systematic way to detect predefined user interaction issues and fix them with cataloged solutions. Most of the existing literature about UX smells focuses on desktop web applications, while there are only a few works ad- dressing the mobile web. Although specific UX smells for mobile interac- tions have been proposed, there are no objective evaluations to determine their impact on the perceived UX. In this work, we evaluated 6 mobile UX smells (3 from the literature and 3 new proposals) with respect to efficiency in use. We conducted an online evaluation with 72 participants in 3 real websites, each one with a set of specific mobile UX Smells. In this evaluation, we compared each website to a refactored version of it- self, i.e. with proposed fixes for each of the smells. To do this, we ran a between-subject experiment in which participants completed 10 every- day tasks on the websites while we measured their efficiency in terms of task completion time and number of user interaction events. As a comple- mentary post-hoc analysis, we also grouped temporally close interaction events into interaction bursts, providing an additional efficiency-related perspective. All the captured metrics were compared in the default ver- sion of the websites vs. their refactored counterparts. Results showed that in most cases (15/20), either the time to complete the task or the amount of interaction events were higher in the presence of UX smells. Moreover, in 7 of the cases, the observed differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The burst-based analysis was consistent with these trends.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
UX Smells
Mobile Web
Efficiency in Use - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191915
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
SEDICI_5e196ca08faa592bb89940aba941aa96 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191915 |
| network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
| repository_id_str |
1329 |
| network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| spelling |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical studyCómo los smells en la experiencia de usuario móvil afectan la eficiencia de la interacción: un estudio empírico multimétricoRaverta, Claudio MarcoGrigera, JuliánGardey, Juan CruzGarrido, AlejandraCiencias InformáticasUX SmellsMobile WebEfficiency in UseThe concept of UX smells has been recently studied as a systematic way to detect predefined user interaction issues and fix them with cataloged solutions. Most of the existing literature about UX smells focuses on desktop web applications, while there are only a few works ad- dressing the mobile web. Although specific UX smells for mobile interac- tions have been proposed, there are no objective evaluations to determine their impact on the perceived UX. In this work, we evaluated 6 mobile UX smells (3 from the literature and 3 new proposals) with respect to efficiency in use. We conducted an online evaluation with 72 participants in 3 real websites, each one with a set of specific mobile UX Smells. In this evaluation, we compared each website to a refactored version of it- self, i.e. with proposed fixes for each of the smells. To do this, we ran a between-subject experiment in which participants completed 10 every- day tasks on the websites while we measured their efficiency in terms of task completion time and number of user interaction events. As a comple- mentary post-hoc analysis, we also grouped temporally close interaction events into interaction bursts, providing an additional efficiency-related perspective. All the captured metrics were compared in the default ver- sion of the websites vs. their refactored counterparts. Results showed that in most cases (15/20), either the time to complete the task or the amount of interaction events were higher in the presence of UX smells. Moreover, in 7 of the cases, the observed differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The burst-based analysis was consistent with these trends.Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa2026-03-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191915enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/ejs/article/view/20426info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1514-6774info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.24215/15146774e092info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2026-03-31T12:41:57Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191915Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292026-03-31 12:41:57.825SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study Cómo los smells en la experiencia de usuario móvil afectan la eficiencia de la interacción: un estudio empírico multimétrico |
| title |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study |
| spellingShingle |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study Raverta, Claudio Marco Ciencias Informáticas UX Smells Mobile Web Efficiency in Use |
| title_short |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study |
| title_full |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study |
| title_fullStr |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study |
| title_sort |
How mobile UX smells affect interaction efficiency: A multi-metric empirical study |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Raverta, Claudio Marco Grigera, Julián Gardey, Juan Cruz Garrido, Alejandra |
| author |
Raverta, Claudio Marco |
| author_facet |
Raverta, Claudio Marco Grigera, Julián Gardey, Juan Cruz Garrido, Alejandra |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Grigera, Julián Gardey, Juan Cruz Garrido, Alejandra |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas UX Smells Mobile Web Efficiency in Use |
| topic |
Ciencias Informáticas UX Smells Mobile Web Efficiency in Use |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The concept of UX smells has been recently studied as a systematic way to detect predefined user interaction issues and fix them with cataloged solutions. Most of the existing literature about UX smells focuses on desktop web applications, while there are only a few works ad- dressing the mobile web. Although specific UX smells for mobile interac- tions have been proposed, there are no objective evaluations to determine their impact on the perceived UX. In this work, we evaluated 6 mobile UX smells (3 from the literature and 3 new proposals) with respect to efficiency in use. We conducted an online evaluation with 72 participants in 3 real websites, each one with a set of specific mobile UX Smells. In this evaluation, we compared each website to a refactored version of it- self, i.e. with proposed fixes for each of the smells. To do this, we ran a between-subject experiment in which participants completed 10 every- day tasks on the websites while we measured their efficiency in terms of task completion time and number of user interaction events. As a comple- mentary post-hoc analysis, we also grouped temporally close interaction events into interaction bursts, providing an additional efficiency-related perspective. All the captured metrics were compared in the default ver- sion of the websites vs. their refactored counterparts. Results showed that in most cases (15/20), either the time to complete the task or the amount of interaction events were higher in the presence of UX smells. Moreover, in 7 of the cases, the observed differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The burst-based analysis was consistent with these trends. Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa |
| description |
The concept of UX smells has been recently studied as a systematic way to detect predefined user interaction issues and fix them with cataloged solutions. Most of the existing literature about UX smells focuses on desktop web applications, while there are only a few works ad- dressing the mobile web. Although specific UX smells for mobile interac- tions have been proposed, there are no objective evaluations to determine their impact on the perceived UX. In this work, we evaluated 6 mobile UX smells (3 from the literature and 3 new proposals) with respect to efficiency in use. We conducted an online evaluation with 72 participants in 3 real websites, each one with a set of specific mobile UX Smells. In this evaluation, we compared each website to a refactored version of it- self, i.e. with proposed fixes for each of the smells. To do this, we ran a between-subject experiment in which participants completed 10 every- day tasks on the websites while we measured their efficiency in terms of task completion time and number of user interaction events. As a comple- mentary post-hoc analysis, we also grouped temporally close interaction events into interaction bursts, providing an additional efficiency-related perspective. All the captured metrics were compared in the default ver- sion of the websites vs. their refactored counterparts. Results showed that in most cases (15/20), either the time to complete the task or the amount of interaction events were higher in the presence of UX smells. Moreover, in 7 of the cases, the observed differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The burst-based analysis was consistent with these trends. |
| publishDate |
2026 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2026-03-09 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191915 |
| url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191915 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/ejs/article/view/20426 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1514-6774 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.24215/15146774e092 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
| reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| instacron_str |
UNLP |
| institution |
UNLP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
| _version_ |
1861199754643374080 |
| score |
13.332987 |