Subjetive Consistency

Autores
Colla, Pedro E.
Año de publicación
2003
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
An alternate effort estimation methodology is proposed to be used at mature software engineering organizations where situations of insufficient historical data or activities resilient to prediction by statistical models exist, in this scenario experts become the most used and sometime only way to perform estimations As experts enter the scene subjectiveness come into play and consistency couldn’t longer be assessed when performing estimations across similar situations or technical contexts. This paper proposes the usage of pairwise comparison methodologies not only by its own merits but also to allow the subjective factors integrated in the experts’ effort estimation to be measured, an therefore assessed in terms of its consistency The benefits of the pairwise comparison methodologies in general, and the Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) methodologies often associated with complex data manipulation are briefly revisited and adaptations are made to it in order to get most benefits from their usage with simple requirements in terms of the hierarchical modeling of the problem and data manipulation. Criteria are discussed to be used as quality figures and validations of the proposed methodology, in particular the usage of the Consistency Ratio (CR)A preliminary experiment is discussed and evaluated in order to validate the scope of the work and to help identify areas that are candidate to receive further attention.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Effort estimation
Expert judgment
Pairwise comparison
Consistency ratio
Analytic Hierarchy Process
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/184717

id SEDICI_59dac78223f392373a1e37d755f12ab0
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/184717
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Subjetive ConsistencyColla, Pedro E.Ciencias InformáticasEffort estimationExpert judgmentPairwise comparisonConsistency ratioAnalytic Hierarchy ProcessAn alternate effort estimation methodology is proposed to be used at mature software engineering organizations where situations of insufficient historical data or activities resilient to prediction by statistical models exist, in this scenario experts become the most used and sometime only way to perform estimations As experts enter the scene subjectiveness come into play and consistency couldn’t longer be assessed when performing estimations across similar situations or technical contexts. This paper proposes the usage of pairwise comparison methodologies not only by its own merits but also to allow the subjective factors integrated in the experts’ effort estimation to be measured, an therefore assessed in terms of its consistency The benefits of the pairwise comparison methodologies in general, and the Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) methodologies often associated with complex data manipulation are briefly revisited and adaptations are made to it in order to get most benefits from their usage with simple requirements in terms of the hierarchical modeling of the problem and data manipulation. Criteria are discussed to be used as quality figures and validations of the proposed methodology, in particular the usage of the Consistency Ratio (CR)A preliminary experiment is discussed and evaluated in order to validate the scope of the work and to help identify areas that are candidate to receive further attention.Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa2003-09info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/184717enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-1087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:50:37Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/184717Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:50:37.488SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Subjetive Consistency
title Subjetive Consistency
spellingShingle Subjetive Consistency
Colla, Pedro E.
Ciencias Informáticas
Effort estimation
Expert judgment
Pairwise comparison
Consistency ratio
Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_short Subjetive Consistency
title_full Subjetive Consistency
title_fullStr Subjetive Consistency
title_full_unstemmed Subjetive Consistency
title_sort Subjetive Consistency
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Colla, Pedro E.
author Colla, Pedro E.
author_facet Colla, Pedro E.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Effort estimation
Expert judgment
Pairwise comparison
Consistency ratio
Analytic Hierarchy Process
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Effort estimation
Expert judgment
Pairwise comparison
Consistency ratio
Analytic Hierarchy Process
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv An alternate effort estimation methodology is proposed to be used at mature software engineering organizations where situations of insufficient historical data or activities resilient to prediction by statistical models exist, in this scenario experts become the most used and sometime only way to perform estimations As experts enter the scene subjectiveness come into play and consistency couldn’t longer be assessed when performing estimations across similar situations or technical contexts. This paper proposes the usage of pairwise comparison methodologies not only by its own merits but also to allow the subjective factors integrated in the experts’ effort estimation to be measured, an therefore assessed in terms of its consistency The benefits of the pairwise comparison methodologies in general, and the Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) methodologies often associated with complex data manipulation are briefly revisited and adaptations are made to it in order to get most benefits from their usage with simple requirements in terms of the hierarchical modeling of the problem and data manipulation. Criteria are discussed to be used as quality figures and validations of the proposed methodology, in particular the usage of the Consistency Ratio (CR)A preliminary experiment is discussed and evaluated in order to validate the scope of the work and to help identify areas that are candidate to receive further attention.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
description An alternate effort estimation methodology is proposed to be used at mature software engineering organizations where situations of insufficient historical data or activities resilient to prediction by statistical models exist, in this scenario experts become the most used and sometime only way to perform estimations As experts enter the scene subjectiveness come into play and consistency couldn’t longer be assessed when performing estimations across similar situations or technical contexts. This paper proposes the usage of pairwise comparison methodologies not only by its own merits but also to allow the subjective factors integrated in the experts’ effort estimation to be measured, an therefore assessed in terms of its consistency The benefits of the pairwise comparison methodologies in general, and the Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) methodologies often associated with complex data manipulation are briefly revisited and adaptations are made to it in order to get most benefits from their usage with simple requirements in terms of the hierarchical modeling of the problem and data manipulation. Criteria are discussed to be used as quality figures and validations of the proposed methodology, in particular the usage of the Consistency Ratio (CR)A preliminary experiment is discussed and evaluated in order to validate the scope of the work and to help identify areas that are candidate to receive further attention.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/184717
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/184717
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-1087
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616364689457152
score 13.070432