Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model

Autores
Curchod, Miguel Ángel; Alberto, Catalina Lucía
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
parte de libro
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Fil: Curchod, Miguel Ángel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
Fil: Alberto, Catalina Lucía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
The aim of this study is a comprehensive assessment of the management of the different production units of the Ordinary Justice Administration in Argentina based on different attributes and criteria underpinning production. This assessment will further allow us to use a ranking method to appraise of the performance of the units analyzed. This study aims to take a first step towards obtaining a comprehensive picture of the system to serve as guidance to look into other specific aspects in subsequent studies. For this reason, the analysis is carried out in a general way, without either specifying the different matters dealt with the ordinary justice system: criminal, civil, administrative, labor or commercial, nor making a distinction of organs or bodies. For this evaluation, we propose to use the discrete multicriteria decision method (DMD): Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and specifically within this methodology, the ratings or scoring model. This approach arises from considering the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a particular case of DMD techniques (Mackeprang Pérez, 2003). This perspective equates: a) the minimum criteria to inputs, b) the maximum criteria to outputs c) and the alternatives to the decision making units (DMU). The international literature accessed makes abundant reference to the analysis and evaluation of efficiency in Justice Courts by means of quantitative techniques, mainly in places like the USA, Canada and European countries. This is not as common in Latin American countries. The works consulted show that the technique generally used in similar cases is Data 36 Envelopment Analysis, although we found some analysis which used parametric models (Pedraja, F. et al. 1995). It is also important that, regardless of the techniques used (mathematical programming, parametric methods or multi-criteria decision analysis), the inputs and outputs defined do not differ greatly. On the other hand, it is important to note that most of the studies carried out the analysis starting from the particular instances, ie focusing the analysis on a specific area (criminal, labor, civil, etc.) or on a particular jurisdiction or on a given instance. It is stated on the other hand, the basic text of this chapter has been presented in full paper character in the Fourth International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Management and Decision Support - Eureka-2013-, held in Mazatlan, Mexico. At that time he underwent refereed and accepted by the scientific committee of the event.
http://hdl.handle.net/11086/1336
Fil: Curchod, Miguel Ángel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
Fil: Alberto, Catalina Lucía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
Ciencias Sociales Interdisciplinarias
Materia
Justice
Evaluation
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Ratings
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
OAI Identificador
oai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/27377

id RDUUNC_7d501d61cfdfcb6881f5442b79cd13c8
oai_identifier_str oai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/27377
network_acronym_str RDUUNC
repository_id_str 2572
network_name_str Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
spelling Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings modelCurchod, Miguel ÁngelAlberto, Catalina LucíaJusticeEvaluationAnalytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)RatingsFil: Curchod, Miguel Ángel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.Fil: Alberto, Catalina Lucía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.The aim of this study is a comprehensive assessment of the management of the different production units of the Ordinary Justice Administration in Argentina based on different attributes and criteria underpinning production. This assessment will further allow us to use a ranking method to appraise of the performance of the units analyzed. This study aims to take a first step towards obtaining a comprehensive picture of the system to serve as guidance to look into other specific aspects in subsequent studies. For this reason, the analysis is carried out in a general way, without either specifying the different matters dealt with the ordinary justice system: criminal, civil, administrative, labor or commercial, nor making a distinction of organs or bodies. For this evaluation, we propose to use the discrete multicriteria decision method (DMD): Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and specifically within this methodology, the ratings or scoring model. This approach arises from considering the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a particular case of DMD techniques (Mackeprang Pérez, 2003). This perspective equates: a) the minimum criteria to inputs, b) the maximum criteria to outputs c) and the alternatives to the decision making units (DMU). The international literature accessed makes abundant reference to the analysis and evaluation of efficiency in Justice Courts by means of quantitative techniques, mainly in places like the USA, Canada and European countries. This is not as common in Latin American countries. The works consulted show that the technique generally used in similar cases is Data 36 Envelopment Analysis, although we found some analysis which used parametric models (Pedraja, F. et al. 1995). It is also important that, regardless of the techniques used (mathematical programming, parametric methods or multi-criteria decision analysis), the inputs and outputs defined do not differ greatly. On the other hand, it is important to note that most of the studies carried out the analysis starting from the particular instances, ie focusing the analysis on a specific area (criminal, labor, civil, etc.) or on a particular jurisdiction or on a given instance. It is stated on the other hand, the basic text of this chapter has been presented in full paper character in the Fourth International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Management and Decision Support - Eureka-2013-, held in Mazatlan, Mexico. At that time he underwent refereed and accepted by the scientific committee of the event.http://hdl.handle.net/11086/1336Fil: Curchod, Miguel Ángel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.Fil: Alberto, Catalina Lucía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.Ciencias Sociales Interdisciplinarias2014info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdf978-987-1436-90-3http://hdl.handle.net/11086/27377enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)instname:Universidad Nacional de Córdobainstacron:UNC2025-09-04T12:31:58Zoai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/27377Institucionalhttps://rdu.unc.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://rdu.unc.edu.ar/oai/snrdoca.unc@gmail.comArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:25722025-09-04 12:31:58.308Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC) - Universidad Nacional de Córdobafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
title Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
spellingShingle Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
Curchod, Miguel Ángel
Justice
Evaluation
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Ratings
title_short Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
title_full Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
title_fullStr Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
title_full_unstemmed Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
title_sort Performance of justice in Argentina. AHP ratings model
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Curchod, Miguel Ángel
Alberto, Catalina Lucía
author Curchod, Miguel Ángel
author_facet Curchod, Miguel Ángel
Alberto, Catalina Lucía
author_role author
author2 Alberto, Catalina Lucía
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Justice
Evaluation
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Ratings
topic Justice
Evaluation
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Ratings
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Fil: Curchod, Miguel Ángel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
Fil: Alberto, Catalina Lucía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
The aim of this study is a comprehensive assessment of the management of the different production units of the Ordinary Justice Administration in Argentina based on different attributes and criteria underpinning production. This assessment will further allow us to use a ranking method to appraise of the performance of the units analyzed. This study aims to take a first step towards obtaining a comprehensive picture of the system to serve as guidance to look into other specific aspects in subsequent studies. For this reason, the analysis is carried out in a general way, without either specifying the different matters dealt with the ordinary justice system: criminal, civil, administrative, labor or commercial, nor making a distinction of organs or bodies. For this evaluation, we propose to use the discrete multicriteria decision method (DMD): Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and specifically within this methodology, the ratings or scoring model. This approach arises from considering the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a particular case of DMD techniques (Mackeprang Pérez, 2003). This perspective equates: a) the minimum criteria to inputs, b) the maximum criteria to outputs c) and the alternatives to the decision making units (DMU). The international literature accessed makes abundant reference to the analysis and evaluation of efficiency in Justice Courts by means of quantitative techniques, mainly in places like the USA, Canada and European countries. This is not as common in Latin American countries. The works consulted show that the technique generally used in similar cases is Data 36 Envelopment Analysis, although we found some analysis which used parametric models (Pedraja, F. et al. 1995). It is also important that, regardless of the techniques used (mathematical programming, parametric methods or multi-criteria decision analysis), the inputs and outputs defined do not differ greatly. On the other hand, it is important to note that most of the studies carried out the analysis starting from the particular instances, ie focusing the analysis on a specific area (criminal, labor, civil, etc.) or on a particular jurisdiction or on a given instance. It is stated on the other hand, the basic text of this chapter has been presented in full paper character in the Fourth International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Management and Decision Support - Eureka-2013-, held in Mazatlan, Mexico. At that time he underwent refereed and accepted by the scientific committee of the event.
http://hdl.handle.net/11086/1336
Fil: Curchod, Miguel Ángel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
Fil: Alberto, Catalina Lucía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
Ciencias Sociales Interdisciplinarias
description Fil: Curchod, Miguel Ángel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro
format bookPart
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 978-987-1436-90-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11086/27377
identifier_str_mv 978-987-1436-90-3
url http://hdl.handle.net/11086/27377
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
instname:Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
instacron:UNC
reponame_str Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
collection Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
instacron_str UNC
institution UNC
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
repository.mail.fl_str_mv oca.unc@gmail.com
_version_ 1842349627375878144
score 13.13397