Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach

Autores
Ruiz, María Esperanza; Volonté, María Guillermina
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aims of the present study were to evaluate the performance of the main methods proposed for the comparison of percentage dissolved versus time curves and to recommend a more biorelevant combined approach for the comparison of dissolution profiles of multisource drug products. In vitro dissolution tests of four brands of oxcarbazepine (OxCBZ) tablets were performed, and the resulting profiles were compared by model-independent, model-dependent, and ANOVA-based statistical methods. After a careful analysis of the results, some methods were chosen and applied to the comparison of dissolution profiles of four brands of carbamazepine (CBZ) tablets and two brands of phenytoin (PHT) capsules. Finally, these in vitro results were qualitatively correlated with the corresponding in vivo results previously obtained with the same CBZ and PHT products assayed in healthy volunteers. The analysis of the dissolution data obtained with OxCBZ tablets allowed discarding the ANOVA-based statistical methods since in all cases they were over-discriminating from a biopharmaceutical point of view. The remaining comparison methods were applied to in vitro profiles of CBZ and PHT products and the results correlated with in vivo data. The most suitable methods for the biopharmaceutical comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles were the model-independent ones, and among them, the best correlations were the f2 similarity factor along with a measure of the dissolution extent (e.g., area under the curve). This combined approach gives a robust and informative result with the most biopharmaceutical relevance.
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas
Materia
Química
Biopharmaceutical
Dissolution profile
Dissolution rate
In vitro-in vivo correlation
Similarity factor
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/85198

id SEDICI_4f10d8347b19e21fc10f0c0d12345ab6
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/85198
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approachRuiz, María EsperanzaVolonté, María GuillerminaQuímicaBiopharmaceuticalDissolution profileDissolution rateIn vitro-in vivo correlationSimilarity factorThe aims of the present study were to evaluate the performance of the main methods proposed for the comparison of percentage dissolved versus time curves and to recommend a more biorelevant combined approach for the comparison of dissolution profiles of multisource drug products. In vitro dissolution tests of four brands of oxcarbazepine (OxCBZ) tablets were performed, and the resulting profiles were compared by model-independent, model-dependent, and ANOVA-based statistical methods. After a careful analysis of the results, some methods were chosen and applied to the comparison of dissolution profiles of four brands of carbamazepine (CBZ) tablets and two brands of phenytoin (PHT) capsules. Finally, these in vitro results were qualitatively correlated with the corresponding in vivo results previously obtained with the same CBZ and PHT products assayed in healthy volunteers. The analysis of the dissolution data obtained with OxCBZ tablets allowed discarding the ANOVA-based statistical methods since in all cases they were over-discriminating from a biopharmaceutical point of view. The remaining comparison methods were applied to in vitro profiles of CBZ and PHT products and the results correlated with in vivo data. The most suitable methods for the biopharmaceutical comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles were the model-independent ones, and among them, the best correlations were the f2 similarity factor along with a measure of the dissolution extent (e.g., area under the curve). This combined approach gives a robust and informative result with the most biopharmaceutical relevance.Facultad de Ciencias Exactas2014info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf32-43http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/85198enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1521-298Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.14227/DT210114P32info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:48:42Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/85198Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:48:42.287SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
title Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
spellingShingle Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
Ruiz, María Esperanza
Química
Biopharmaceutical
Dissolution profile
Dissolution rate
In vitro-in vivo correlation
Similarity factor
title_short Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
title_full Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
title_fullStr Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
title_full_unstemmed Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
title_sort Biopharmaceutical relevance of dissolution profile comparison: Proposal of a combined approach
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ruiz, María Esperanza
Volonté, María Guillermina
author Ruiz, María Esperanza
author_facet Ruiz, María Esperanza
Volonté, María Guillermina
author_role author
author2 Volonté, María Guillermina
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Química
Biopharmaceutical
Dissolution profile
Dissolution rate
In vitro-in vivo correlation
Similarity factor
topic Química
Biopharmaceutical
Dissolution profile
Dissolution rate
In vitro-in vivo correlation
Similarity factor
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aims of the present study were to evaluate the performance of the main methods proposed for the comparison of percentage dissolved versus time curves and to recommend a more biorelevant combined approach for the comparison of dissolution profiles of multisource drug products. In vitro dissolution tests of four brands of oxcarbazepine (OxCBZ) tablets were performed, and the resulting profiles were compared by model-independent, model-dependent, and ANOVA-based statistical methods. After a careful analysis of the results, some methods were chosen and applied to the comparison of dissolution profiles of four brands of carbamazepine (CBZ) tablets and two brands of phenytoin (PHT) capsules. Finally, these in vitro results were qualitatively correlated with the corresponding in vivo results previously obtained with the same CBZ and PHT products assayed in healthy volunteers. The analysis of the dissolution data obtained with OxCBZ tablets allowed discarding the ANOVA-based statistical methods since in all cases they were over-discriminating from a biopharmaceutical point of view. The remaining comparison methods were applied to in vitro profiles of CBZ and PHT products and the results correlated with in vivo data. The most suitable methods for the biopharmaceutical comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles were the model-independent ones, and among them, the best correlations were the f2 similarity factor along with a measure of the dissolution extent (e.g., area under the curve). This combined approach gives a robust and informative result with the most biopharmaceutical relevance.
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas
description The aims of the present study were to evaluate the performance of the main methods proposed for the comparison of percentage dissolved versus time curves and to recommend a more biorelevant combined approach for the comparison of dissolution profiles of multisource drug products. In vitro dissolution tests of four brands of oxcarbazepine (OxCBZ) tablets were performed, and the resulting profiles were compared by model-independent, model-dependent, and ANOVA-based statistical methods. After a careful analysis of the results, some methods were chosen and applied to the comparison of dissolution profiles of four brands of carbamazepine (CBZ) tablets and two brands of phenytoin (PHT) capsules. Finally, these in vitro results were qualitatively correlated with the corresponding in vivo results previously obtained with the same CBZ and PHT products assayed in healthy volunteers. The analysis of the dissolution data obtained with OxCBZ tablets allowed discarding the ANOVA-based statistical methods since in all cases they were over-discriminating from a biopharmaceutical point of view. The remaining comparison methods were applied to in vitro profiles of CBZ and PHT products and the results correlated with in vivo data. The most suitable methods for the biopharmaceutical comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles were the model-independent ones, and among them, the best correlations were the f2 similarity factor along with a measure of the dissolution extent (e.g., area under the curve). This combined approach gives a robust and informative result with the most biopharmaceutical relevance.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/85198
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/85198
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1521-298X
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.14227/DT210114P32
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
32-43
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260363073028096
score 13.13397