Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation

Autores
Cont, Walter Alberto; Fernández Felices, Diego
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper analyzes multi-stage taxation by provinces in a federal country, using a novel two-good, two-province, successive-oligopoly heterogeneous-product Bertrand competition model, where each producer is located in a province and sells its product through exclusive retailers located in both provinces. The producer-retailer setup allows provincial governments to raise taxes on upstream and downstream transactions. First, we analyze tax incidence results and emphasize the importance of the degree of downstream competition on the tax shifting. Second, we solve a non-cooperative revenue maximization problem and study the properties of the equilibrium taxes. We characterize the solution: either all tax rates are positive or one province drops one tax rate. This way, the full-tax solution dominates upstream and downstream taxation. Also, the non-cooperative solution implies over-taxation when compared with the cooperative solution.
Este paper analiza impuestos en múltiples etapas recaudados por provincias en un país federal, utilizando un modelo novedoso de competencia en dos segmentos productor- minorista a la Bertrand con productos diferenciados, donde cada productor está ubicado en una provincia, y vende en todo el país a través de sus distribuidores. Este modelo genera la posibilidad de que las provincias recauden en las dos etapas de transacciones. En primer lugar, se obtienen resultados de incidencia, enfatizando la importancia del grado de diferenciación sobre la traslación. En segundo lugar, se resuelve el problema de maximization de recaudación en un contexto no cooperativo y se estudian las propiedades de las alícuotas de equilibrio: las provincias utilizan todas las alícuotas o una de ellas descarta sólo una alícuota. La solución no cooperativa domina (en términos de recaudación) a los casos de impuestos al productor o a las ventas minoristas. Por otro lado, esta solución se caracteriza por imposición excesiva, (respecto de un caso cooperativo).
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
Materia
Ciencias Económicas
local indirect taxation
multistage taxes
tax icidence
tax competition
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/173853

id SEDICI_32203f6496032693a7ecfe9024faa22e
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/173853
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxationCont, Walter AlbertoFernández Felices, DiegoCiencias Económicaslocal indirect taxationmultistage taxestax icidencetax competitionThis paper analyzes multi-stage taxation by provinces in a federal country, using a novel two-good, two-province, successive-oligopoly heterogeneous-product Bertrand competition model, where each producer is located in a province and sells its product through exclusive retailers located in both provinces. The producer-retailer setup allows provincial governments to raise taxes on upstream and downstream transactions. First, we analyze tax incidence results and emphasize the importance of the degree of downstream competition on the tax shifting. Second, we solve a non-cooperative revenue maximization problem and study the properties of the equilibrium taxes. We characterize the solution: either all tax rates are positive or one province drops one tax rate. This way, the full-tax solution dominates upstream and downstream taxation. Also, the non-cooperative solution implies over-taxation when compared with the cooperative solution.Este paper analiza impuestos en múltiples etapas recaudados por provincias en un país federal, utilizando un modelo novedoso de competencia en dos segmentos productor- minorista a la Bertrand con productos diferenciados, donde cada productor está ubicado en una provincia, y vende en todo el país a través de sus distribuidores. Este modelo genera la posibilidad de que las provincias recauden en las dos etapas de transacciones. En primer lugar, se obtienen resultados de incidencia, enfatizando la importancia del grado de diferenciación sobre la traslación. En segundo lugar, se resuelve el problema de maximization de recaudación en un contexto no cooperativo y se estudian las propiedades de las alícuotas de equilibrio: las provincias utilizan todas las alícuotas o una de ellas descarta sólo una alícuota. La solución no cooperativa domina (en términos de recaudación) a los casos de impuestos al productor o a las ventas minoristas. Por otro lado, esta solución se caracteriza por imposición excesiva, (respecto de un caso cooperativo).Facultad de Ciencias Económicas2016-11info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/173853enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-28590-4-6info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bd.aaep.org.ar/anales/works/works2016/cont.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1852-0022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T11:35:06Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/173853Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 11:35:06.9SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
title Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
spellingShingle Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
Cont, Walter Alberto
Ciencias Económicas
local indirect taxation
multistage taxes
tax icidence
tax competition
title_short Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
title_full Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
title_fullStr Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
title_full_unstemmed Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
title_sort Multi-stage taxation by subnational governments: Tax incidence and Leviathan taxation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cont, Walter Alberto
Fernández Felices, Diego
author Cont, Walter Alberto
author_facet Cont, Walter Alberto
Fernández Felices, Diego
author_role author
author2 Fernández Felices, Diego
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Económicas
local indirect taxation
multistage taxes
tax icidence
tax competition
topic Ciencias Económicas
local indirect taxation
multistage taxes
tax icidence
tax competition
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper analyzes multi-stage taxation by provinces in a federal country, using a novel two-good, two-province, successive-oligopoly heterogeneous-product Bertrand competition model, where each producer is located in a province and sells its product through exclusive retailers located in both provinces. The producer-retailer setup allows provincial governments to raise taxes on upstream and downstream transactions. First, we analyze tax incidence results and emphasize the importance of the degree of downstream competition on the tax shifting. Second, we solve a non-cooperative revenue maximization problem and study the properties of the equilibrium taxes. We characterize the solution: either all tax rates are positive or one province drops one tax rate. This way, the full-tax solution dominates upstream and downstream taxation. Also, the non-cooperative solution implies over-taxation when compared with the cooperative solution.
Este paper analiza impuestos en múltiples etapas recaudados por provincias en un país federal, utilizando un modelo novedoso de competencia en dos segmentos productor- minorista a la Bertrand con productos diferenciados, donde cada productor está ubicado en una provincia, y vende en todo el país a través de sus distribuidores. Este modelo genera la posibilidad de que las provincias recauden en las dos etapas de transacciones. En primer lugar, se obtienen resultados de incidencia, enfatizando la importancia del grado de diferenciación sobre la traslación. En segundo lugar, se resuelve el problema de maximization de recaudación en un contexto no cooperativo y se estudian las propiedades de las alícuotas de equilibrio: las provincias utilizan todas las alícuotas o una de ellas descarta sólo una alícuota. La solución no cooperativa domina (en términos de recaudación) a los casos de impuestos al productor o a las ventas minoristas. Por otro lado, esta solución se caracteriza por imposición excesiva, (respecto de un caso cooperativo).
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
description This paper analyzes multi-stage taxation by provinces in a federal country, using a novel two-good, two-province, successive-oligopoly heterogeneous-product Bertrand competition model, where each producer is located in a province and sells its product through exclusive retailers located in both provinces. The producer-retailer setup allows provincial governments to raise taxes on upstream and downstream transactions. First, we analyze tax incidence results and emphasize the importance of the degree of downstream competition on the tax shifting. Second, we solve a non-cooperative revenue maximization problem and study the properties of the equilibrium taxes. We characterize the solution: either all tax rates are positive or one province drops one tax rate. This way, the full-tax solution dominates upstream and downstream taxation. Also, the non-cooperative solution implies over-taxation when compared with the cooperative solution.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/173853
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/173853
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-28590-4-6
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bd.aaep.org.ar/anales/works/works2016/cont.pdf
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1852-0022
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846064377036275712
score 13.22299