Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859
- Autores
- Leoni, Juan Bautista; Martínez, Lucas H.
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The battle of Cepeda, 1859, was one of the high points in the crucial confrontation between the Argentine Confederation and the then rebellious Buenos Aires Province, which shaped the process of modern nation state building. Whereas the confederate army commanded by president Justo J. Urquiza defeated the provincial army led by Bartolomé Mitre, this victory would not be decisive and more fighting would follow until Buenos Aires’ definitive triumph in 1861. The battle has only been studied by historians, using the contradictory commanders’ battle reports. This paper presents the archaeological research on the battlefield. We discuss methods, finds, and interpretations, but also use this case study to address three major issues that differentiate this battlefield study from contemporary European and North American cases: 1) Heterodox battle tactics, which combined Napoleonic style tactics for infantry and artillery, with a locally developed emphasis on irregular and light cavalry; 2) A lack of written sources on both weapons employed and specific details of the battle; 3) Landscape transformations that significantly altered the original battle ground. As a whole, these issues - a widespread occurrence in Argentine XIXst century battles - challenge the development of battlefield studies and pose limitations to its interpretive potential.
Fil: Fil: Leoni, Juan Bautista. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes. Departamento de Arqueología. Rosario; Argentina
Fil: Fil: Martínez, Lucas H. Instituto Cultural de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
Battle of Cepeda
Battlefield Archaeology
Argentina
1859
Challenges - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de Rosario
- OAI Identificador
- oai:rephip.unr.edu.ar:2133/21435
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
RepHipUNR_292d5664abc9ad1acdbbf15277f08d5a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:rephip.unr.edu.ar:2133/21435 |
| network_acronym_str |
RepHipUNR |
| repository_id_str |
1550 |
| network_name_str |
RepHipUNR (UNR) |
| spelling |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859Leoni, Juan BautistaMartínez, Lucas H.Battle of CepedaBattlefield ArchaeologyArgentina1859ChallengesThe battle of Cepeda, 1859, was one of the high points in the crucial confrontation between the Argentine Confederation and the then rebellious Buenos Aires Province, which shaped the process of modern nation state building. Whereas the confederate army commanded by president Justo J. Urquiza defeated the provincial army led by Bartolomé Mitre, this victory would not be decisive and more fighting would follow until Buenos Aires’ definitive triumph in 1861. The battle has only been studied by historians, using the contradictory commanders’ battle reports. This paper presents the archaeological research on the battlefield. We discuss methods, finds, and interpretations, but also use this case study to address three major issues that differentiate this battlefield study from contemporary European and North American cases: 1) Heterodox battle tactics, which combined Napoleonic style tactics for infantry and artillery, with a locally developed emphasis on irregular and light cavalry; 2) A lack of written sources on both weapons employed and specific details of the battle; 3) Landscape transformations that significantly altered the original battle ground. As a whole, these issues - a widespread occurrence in Argentine XIXst century battles - challenge the development of battlefield studies and pose limitations to its interpretive potential.Fil: Fil: Leoni, Juan Bautista. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes. Departamento de Arqueología. Rosario; ArgentinaFil: Fil: Martínez, Lucas H. Instituto Cultural de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires; ArgentinaConference Proceedings: Fields Of ConflictTrinity College, Dublin, IrelandTrinity Center for Medieval and Renaissance StudiesUniversity of York2016info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2133/21435enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.esLicencia RepHipreponame:RepHipUNR (UNR)instname:Universidad Nacional de Rosario2025-11-06T09:38:03Zoai:rephip.unr.edu.ar:2133/21435instacron:UNRInstitucionalhttps://rephip.unr.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://rephip.unr.edu.ar/oai/requestrephip@unr.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:15502025-11-06 09:38:04.155RepHipUNR (UNR) - Universidad Nacional de Rosariofalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 |
| title |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 |
| spellingShingle |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 Leoni, Juan Bautista Battle of Cepeda Battlefield Archaeology Argentina 1859 Challenges |
| title_short |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 |
| title_full |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 |
| title_fullStr |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 |
| title_sort |
Challenges and Specificities of Battlefield Archaeology in Argentina: The Case of Cepeda Battlefield, 1859 |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Leoni, Juan Bautista Martínez, Lucas H. |
| author |
Leoni, Juan Bautista |
| author_facet |
Leoni, Juan Bautista Martínez, Lucas H. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Martínez, Lucas H. |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland Trinity Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies University of York |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Battle of Cepeda Battlefield Archaeology Argentina 1859 Challenges |
| topic |
Battle of Cepeda Battlefield Archaeology Argentina 1859 Challenges |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The battle of Cepeda, 1859, was one of the high points in the crucial confrontation between the Argentine Confederation and the then rebellious Buenos Aires Province, which shaped the process of modern nation state building. Whereas the confederate army commanded by president Justo J. Urquiza defeated the provincial army led by Bartolomé Mitre, this victory would not be decisive and more fighting would follow until Buenos Aires’ definitive triumph in 1861. The battle has only been studied by historians, using the contradictory commanders’ battle reports. This paper presents the archaeological research on the battlefield. We discuss methods, finds, and interpretations, but also use this case study to address three major issues that differentiate this battlefield study from contemporary European and North American cases: 1) Heterodox battle tactics, which combined Napoleonic style tactics for infantry and artillery, with a locally developed emphasis on irregular and light cavalry; 2) A lack of written sources on both weapons employed and specific details of the battle; 3) Landscape transformations that significantly altered the original battle ground. As a whole, these issues - a widespread occurrence in Argentine XIXst century battles - challenge the development of battlefield studies and pose limitations to its interpretive potential. Fil: Fil: Leoni, Juan Bautista. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes. Departamento de Arqueología. Rosario; Argentina Fil: Fil: Martínez, Lucas H. Instituto Cultural de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires; Argentina |
| description |
The battle of Cepeda, 1859, was one of the high points in the crucial confrontation between the Argentine Confederation and the then rebellious Buenos Aires Province, which shaped the process of modern nation state building. Whereas the confederate army commanded by president Justo J. Urquiza defeated the provincial army led by Bartolomé Mitre, this victory would not be decisive and more fighting would follow until Buenos Aires’ definitive triumph in 1861. The battle has only been studied by historians, using the contradictory commanders’ battle reports. This paper presents the archaeological research on the battlefield. We discuss methods, finds, and interpretations, but also use this case study to address three major issues that differentiate this battlefield study from contemporary European and North American cases: 1) Heterodox battle tactics, which combined Napoleonic style tactics for infantry and artillery, with a locally developed emphasis on irregular and light cavalry; 2) A lack of written sources on both weapons employed and specific details of the battle; 3) Landscape transformations that significantly altered the original battle ground. As a whole, these issues - a widespread occurrence in Argentine XIXst century battles - challenge the development of battlefield studies and pose limitations to its interpretive potential. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/2133/21435 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2133/21435 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Licencia RepHip |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es Licencia RepHip |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conference Proceedings: Fields Of Conflict |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conference Proceedings: Fields Of Conflict |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:RepHipUNR (UNR) instname:Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| reponame_str |
RepHipUNR (UNR) |
| collection |
RepHipUNR (UNR) |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RepHipUNR (UNR) - Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rephip@unr.edu.ar |
| _version_ |
1848045613709524992 |
| score |
13.087074 |