Thinking of creation

Autores
Campodonico, Angelo
Año de publicación
1999
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Fil: Campodonico, Angelo. University of Genoa; Italia
I would like to answer the question whether creation can be proved and chiefly whether it is nowadays a plausible concept and how it ought be conceivable by us. I believe that an important guide to metaphysical truth is «plausibility in the light of total understanding»2. The great alternative of explicit or implicit metaphysical thought is the concept of creation and monism in its different forms (from materialism to pantheism). Monism is a continuous temptation to human thought3. In fact to perceive being as being makes the whole of being accessible, and that means the absolute (in a vide sense). Whole as whole is absolute, because it does not depend on anything. Although it may be difficult to affirm that the whole of reality coincides strictly with the Absolute, monism, in fact, attempts to unify everything and to project up a material climension on the whole of reality. Even in the case of spiritual monism, I would stress that the everyday experience of quantity, deeply connected with sense perception, plays the main role in the genesis of monism as Augustine demonstrates and C. S. Lewis argues: «The apparent profundity of Pantheism thinly veils a mass of spontaneous picture-thinking and owes its plausibility to that fact. Pantheists and Christians agree that God is present every\vhere. Pantheists conclude that He is "diffused" or "concealed" in all things and therefore a universal medium rather than a concrete entity, because their minds are really dominated by the picture of a gas, or fluid, or space itself. The Christian, on the other hand, deliberately rules out such imagen by saying that God is totally present at every point of space and time, and locally present in none»4. This tendency towards monism as well as the tendency towards the concept of creation has also anthropological and ethical roots, as I will try to argue...
Fuente
Sapientia Vol. 54, No.206, 1999
Materia
DIOS
CREACION
EXISTENCIA DE DIOS
CRISTIANISMO
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
Institución
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
OAI Identificador
oai:ucacris:123456789/12920

id RIUCA_f0a8d6f3ebe83d0ec48de773f386555e
oai_identifier_str oai:ucacris:123456789/12920
network_acronym_str RIUCA
repository_id_str 2585
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
spelling Thinking of creationCampodonico, AngeloDIOSCREACIONEXISTENCIA DE DIOSCRISTIANISMOFil: Campodonico, Angelo. University of Genoa; ItaliaI would like to answer the question whether creation can be proved and chiefly whether it is nowadays a plausible concept and how it ought be conceivable by us. I believe that an important guide to metaphysical truth is «plausibility in the light of total understanding»2. The great alternative of explicit or implicit metaphysical thought is the concept of creation and monism in its different forms (from materialism to pantheism). Monism is a continuous temptation to human thought3. In fact to perceive being as being makes the whole of being accessible, and that means the absolute (in a vide sense). Whole as whole is absolute, because it does not depend on anything. Although it may be difficult to affirm that the whole of reality coincides strictly with the Absolute, monism, in fact, attempts to unify everything and to project up a material climension on the whole of reality. Even in the case of spiritual monism, I would stress that the everyday experience of quantity, deeply connected with sense perception, plays the main role in the genesis of monism as Augustine demonstrates and C. S. Lewis argues: «The apparent profundity of Pantheism thinly veils a mass of spontaneous picture-thinking and owes its plausibility to that fact. Pantheists and Christians agree that God is present every\vhere. Pantheists conclude that He is "diffused" or "concealed" in all things and therefore a universal medium rather than a concrete entity, because their minds are really dominated by the picture of a gas, or fluid, or space itself. The Christian, on the other hand, deliberately rules out such imagen by saying that God is totally present at every point of space and time, and locally present in none»4. This tendency towards monism as well as the tendency towards the concept of creation has also anthropological and ethical roots, as I will try to argue...Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras1999info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/129200036-4703Campodonico, A. Thinking of creation [en línea]. Sapientia. 1999, 54 (206). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/12920Sapientia Vol. 54, No.206, 1999reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA)instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2025-07-03T10:58:15Zoai:ucacris:123456789/12920instacron:UCAInstitucionalhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/Universidad privadaNo correspondehttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/oaiclaudia_fernandez@uca.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:25852025-07-03 10:58:15.926Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thinking of creation
title Thinking of creation
spellingShingle Thinking of creation
Campodonico, Angelo
DIOS
CREACION
EXISTENCIA DE DIOS
CRISTIANISMO
title_short Thinking of creation
title_full Thinking of creation
title_fullStr Thinking of creation
title_full_unstemmed Thinking of creation
title_sort Thinking of creation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Campodonico, Angelo
author Campodonico, Angelo
author_facet Campodonico, Angelo
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DIOS
CREACION
EXISTENCIA DE DIOS
CRISTIANISMO
topic DIOS
CREACION
EXISTENCIA DE DIOS
CRISTIANISMO
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Fil: Campodonico, Angelo. University of Genoa; Italia
I would like to answer the question whether creation can be proved and chiefly whether it is nowadays a plausible concept and how it ought be conceivable by us. I believe that an important guide to metaphysical truth is «plausibility in the light of total understanding»2. The great alternative of explicit or implicit metaphysical thought is the concept of creation and monism in its different forms (from materialism to pantheism). Monism is a continuous temptation to human thought3. In fact to perceive being as being makes the whole of being accessible, and that means the absolute (in a vide sense). Whole as whole is absolute, because it does not depend on anything. Although it may be difficult to affirm that the whole of reality coincides strictly with the Absolute, monism, in fact, attempts to unify everything and to project up a material climension on the whole of reality. Even in the case of spiritual monism, I would stress that the everyday experience of quantity, deeply connected with sense perception, plays the main role in the genesis of monism as Augustine demonstrates and C. S. Lewis argues: «The apparent profundity of Pantheism thinly veils a mass of spontaneous picture-thinking and owes its plausibility to that fact. Pantheists and Christians agree that God is present every\vhere. Pantheists conclude that He is "diffused" or "concealed" in all things and therefore a universal medium rather than a concrete entity, because their minds are really dominated by the picture of a gas, or fluid, or space itself. The Christian, on the other hand, deliberately rules out such imagen by saying that God is totally present at every point of space and time, and locally present in none»4. This tendency towards monism as well as the tendency towards the concept of creation has also anthropological and ethical roots, as I will try to argue...
description Fil: Campodonico, Angelo. University of Genoa; Italia
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/12920
0036-4703
Campodonico, A. Thinking of creation [en línea]. Sapientia. 1999, 54 (206). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/12920
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/12920
identifier_str_mv 0036-4703
Campodonico, A. Thinking of creation [en línea]. Sapientia. 1999, 54 (206). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/12920
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia Vol. 54, No.206, 1999
reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
reponame_str Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
collection Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv claudia_fernandez@uca.edu.ar
_version_ 1836638359073587200
score 12.993085