The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
- Autores
- Weisheipl, James A.
- Año de publicación
- 1974
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; Canadá
The "commentary" or Sententia de caelo et mundo of St. Thomas is a work of great maturity and profundity. It is one of Thomas's last writings, and it reveals a breadth of scholarship and achievement wanting, for the most part, in his earlier Aristotelian comentaries, such as those on the Ethics, Physics, De anima, and early parts of . the Metaphysics; but it comes to grips with profound problems of Aristotelianhpi loso bpy inherent in the conflictingg views of Greek and Arab commentators. I. T. Eschmann rightly noted that "itrepresents; the high water-mark of St. Thomas's expository skill".' In long subtle digressions, Thomas discusses and evaluates the views of other commentators reported by Simplicius, as well as the views of Simplicius himself, who is a primary source in this commentary. As in earlier commentaries, Thomas was also concerned with the teaching of Averróes, which deeply influenced the masters in arts at Paris in the late 1260s and throughout the 1270s. The excessive adoption of Averroes by masters in arts resulted in the condemnation of 13 Averroes theses on Dec. 10, 1270, by the bishop of Paris, Etienne Tempier, and in the- more sweeping condemnation by the same bishop on March 7, 1277. Simplicius and Averroes are in fact the two basic sources for Thomas's commentary on De caelo... - Fuente
- Sapientia Vol.29, No.111, 1974
- Materia
-
Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274
FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA
Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C. - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ucacris:123456789/16007
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
RIUCA_eb04bca2422ab9f0d926da6b5675987e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ucacris:123456789/16007 |
network_acronym_str |
RIUCA |
repository_id_str |
2585 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) |
spelling |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of AristotleWeisheipl, James A.Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZAAristóteles, 384-322 a. C.Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; CanadáThe "commentary" or Sententia de caelo et mundo of St. Thomas is a work of great maturity and profundity. It is one of Thomas's last writings, and it reveals a breadth of scholarship and achievement wanting, for the most part, in his earlier Aristotelian comentaries, such as those on the Ethics, Physics, De anima, and early parts of . the Metaphysics; but it comes to grips with profound problems of Aristotelianhpi loso bpy inherent in the conflictingg views of Greek and Arab commentators. I. T. Eschmann rightly noted that "itrepresents; the high water-mark of St. Thomas's expository skill".' In long subtle digressions, Thomas discusses and evaluates the views of other commentators reported by Simplicius, as well as the views of Simplicius himself, who is a primary source in this commentary. As in earlier commentaries, Thomas was also concerned with the teaching of Averróes, which deeply influenced the masters in arts at Paris in the late 1260s and throughout the 1270s. The excessive adoption of Averroes by masters in arts resulted in the condemnation of 13 Averroes theses on Dec. 10, 1270, by the bishop of Paris, Etienne Tempier, and in the- more sweeping condemnation by the same bishop on March 7, 1277. Simplicius and Averroes are in fact the two basic sources for Thomas's commentary on De caelo...Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras1974info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/160070036-4703Weisheipl, J. A. The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle [en línea]. Sapientia.1974, 29 (111). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007Sapientia Vol.29, No.111, 1974reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA)instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinaspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2025-07-03T10:59:08Zoai:ucacris:123456789/16007instacron:UCAInstitucionalhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/Universidad privadaNo correspondehttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/oaiclaudia_fernandez@uca.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:25852025-07-03 10:59:09.063Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle |
title |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle |
spellingShingle |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle Weisheipl, James A. Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274 FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C. |
title_short |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle |
title_full |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle |
title_fullStr |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle |
title_full_unstemmed |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle |
title_sort |
The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Weisheipl, James A. |
author |
Weisheipl, James A. |
author_facet |
Weisheipl, James A. |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274 FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C. |
topic |
Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274 FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C. |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; Canadá The "commentary" or Sententia de caelo et mundo of St. Thomas is a work of great maturity and profundity. It is one of Thomas's last writings, and it reveals a breadth of scholarship and achievement wanting, for the most part, in his earlier Aristotelian comentaries, such as those on the Ethics, Physics, De anima, and early parts of . the Metaphysics; but it comes to grips with profound problems of Aristotelianhpi loso bpy inherent in the conflictingg views of Greek and Arab commentators. I. T. Eschmann rightly noted that "itrepresents; the high water-mark of St. Thomas's expository skill".' In long subtle digressions, Thomas discusses and evaluates the views of other commentators reported by Simplicius, as well as the views of Simplicius himself, who is a primary source in this commentary. As in earlier commentaries, Thomas was also concerned with the teaching of Averróes, which deeply influenced the masters in arts at Paris in the late 1260s and throughout the 1270s. The excessive adoption of Averroes by masters in arts resulted in the condemnation of 13 Averroes theses on Dec. 10, 1270, by the bishop of Paris, Etienne Tempier, and in the- more sweeping condemnation by the same bishop on March 7, 1277. Simplicius and Averroes are in fact the two basic sources for Thomas's commentary on De caelo... |
description |
Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; Canadá |
publishDate |
1974 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1974 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007 0036-4703 Weisheipl, J. A. The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle [en línea]. Sapientia.1974, 29 (111). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007 |
url |
https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007 |
identifier_str_mv |
0036-4703 Weisheipl, J. A. The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle [en línea]. Sapientia.1974, 29 (111). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sapientia Vol.29, No.111, 1974 reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA) instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) |
collection |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
claudia_fernandez@uca.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1836638367485263872 |
score |
13.070432 |