The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle

Autores
Weisheipl, James A.
Año de publicación
1974
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; Canadá
The "commentary" or Sententia de caelo et mundo of St. Thomas is a work of great maturity and profundity. It is one of Thomas's last writings, and it reveals a breadth of scholarship and achievement wanting, for the most part, in his earlier Aristotelian comentaries, such as those on the Ethics, Physics, De anima, and early parts of . the Metaphysics; but it comes to grips with profound problems of Aristotelianhpi loso bpy inherent in the conflictingg views of Greek and Arab commentators. I. T. Eschmann rightly noted that "itrepresents; the high water-mark of St. Thomas's expository skill".' In long subtle digressions, Thomas discusses and evaluates the views of other commentators reported by Simplicius, as well as the views of Simplicius himself, who is a primary source in this commentary. As in earlier commentaries, Thomas was also concerned with the teaching of Averróes, which deeply influenced the masters in arts at Paris in the late 1260s and throughout the 1270s. The excessive adoption of Averroes by masters in arts resulted in the condemnation of 13 Averroes theses on Dec. 10, 1270, by the bishop of Paris, Etienne Tempier, and in the- more sweeping condemnation by the same bishop on March 7, 1277. Simplicius and Averroes are in fact the two basic sources for Thomas's commentary on De caelo...
Fuente
Sapientia Vol.29, No.111, 1974
Materia
Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274
FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA
Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C.
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
Institución
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
OAI Identificador
oai:ucacris:123456789/16007

id RIUCA_eb04bca2422ab9f0d926da6b5675987e
oai_identifier_str oai:ucacris:123456789/16007
network_acronym_str RIUCA
repository_id_str 2585
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
spelling The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of AristotleWeisheipl, James A.Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZAAristóteles, 384-322 a. C.Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; CanadáThe "commentary" or Sententia de caelo et mundo of St. Thomas is a work of great maturity and profundity. It is one of Thomas's last writings, and it reveals a breadth of scholarship and achievement wanting, for the most part, in his earlier Aristotelian comentaries, such as those on the Ethics, Physics, De anima, and early parts of . the Metaphysics; but it comes to grips with profound problems of Aristotelianhpi loso bpy inherent in the conflictingg views of Greek and Arab commentators. I. T. Eschmann rightly noted that "itrepresents; the high water-mark of St. Thomas's expository skill".' In long subtle digressions, Thomas discusses and evaluates the views of other commentators reported by Simplicius, as well as the views of Simplicius himself, who is a primary source in this commentary. As in earlier commentaries, Thomas was also concerned with the teaching of Averróes, which deeply influenced the masters in arts at Paris in the late 1260s and throughout the 1270s. The excessive adoption of Averroes by masters in arts resulted in the condemnation of 13 Averroes theses on Dec. 10, 1270, by the bishop of Paris, Etienne Tempier, and in the- more sweeping condemnation by the same bishop on March 7, 1277. Simplicius and Averroes are in fact the two basic sources for Thomas's commentary on De caelo...Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras1974info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/160070036-4703Weisheipl, J. A. The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle [en línea]. Sapientia.1974, 29 (111). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007Sapientia Vol.29, No.111, 1974reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA)instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinaspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2025-07-03T10:59:08Zoai:ucacris:123456789/16007instacron:UCAInstitucionalhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/Universidad privadaNo correspondehttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/oaiclaudia_fernandez@uca.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:25852025-07-03 10:59:09.063Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
title The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
spellingShingle The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
Weisheipl, James A.
Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274
FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA
Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C.
title_short The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
title_full The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
title_fullStr The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
title_full_unstemmed The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
title_sort The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Weisheipl, James A.
author Weisheipl, James A.
author_facet Weisheipl, James A.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274
FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA
Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C.
topic Tomás de Aquino, Santo, 1225?-1274
FILOSOFIA DE LA NATURALEZA
Aristóteles, 384-322 a. C.
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; Canadá
The "commentary" or Sententia de caelo et mundo of St. Thomas is a work of great maturity and profundity. It is one of Thomas's last writings, and it reveals a breadth of scholarship and achievement wanting, for the most part, in his earlier Aristotelian comentaries, such as those on the Ethics, Physics, De anima, and early parts of . the Metaphysics; but it comes to grips with profound problems of Aristotelianhpi loso bpy inherent in the conflictingg views of Greek and Arab commentators. I. T. Eschmann rightly noted that "itrepresents; the high water-mark of St. Thomas's expository skill".' In long subtle digressions, Thomas discusses and evaluates the views of other commentators reported by Simplicius, as well as the views of Simplicius himself, who is a primary source in this commentary. As in earlier commentaries, Thomas was also concerned with the teaching of Averróes, which deeply influenced the masters in arts at Paris in the late 1260s and throughout the 1270s. The excessive adoption of Averroes by masters in arts resulted in the condemnation of 13 Averroes theses on Dec. 10, 1270, by the bishop of Paris, Etienne Tempier, and in the- more sweeping condemnation by the same bishop on March 7, 1277. Simplicius and Averroes are in fact the two basic sources for Thomas's commentary on De caelo...
description Fil: Weisheipl, James A. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; Canadá
publishDate 1974
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1974
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007
0036-4703
Weisheipl, J. A. The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle [en línea]. Sapientia.1974, 29 (111). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007
identifier_str_mv 0036-4703
Weisheipl, J. A. The commentary of St. Thomas on the De Caelo of Aristotle [en línea]. Sapientia.1974, 29 (111). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16007
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia Vol.29, No.111, 1974
reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
reponame_str Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
collection Repositorio Institucional (UCA)
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv claudia_fernandez@uca.edu.ar
_version_ 1836638367485263872
score 13.070432