Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH

Autores
Belardinelli, P. A.; Morelatto, R. A.; Benavidez, T. E.; Baruzzi, A. M.; López de Blanc, S. A
Año de publicación
2004
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
To analyze the effect of two mouthwashes on salivary pH and correlate it with age, buffer capacity and saliva flow rate in healthy volunteers, a crossover phase IV clinical study involving three age-based groups was designed. Two commercial mouthwashes (MW), Cool Mint Listerine® (MWa) and Periobacter ® (MWb) were used. The unstimulated saliva of each individual was first characterized by measuring flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity. Salivary pH was evaluated before rinsing with a given MW, immediately after rinsing, 5 minutes later, and then every 10 min (at 15, 25, 35 min) until the baseline pH was recovered. Paired t-test, ANOVA with a randomized block design, and Pearson correlation tests were used. Averages were 0.63 mL/min, 7.06, and 0.87 for flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity, respectively. An immediate significant increase in salivary pH was observed after rinsing, reaching average values of 7.24(MWb) and 7.30 (MWa), which declined to an almost stable value 15minutes. The great increase in salivary pH, after MW use shows that saliva is a dynamic system, and that the organism is capable of responding to a stimulus with changes in its composition. It is thus evident that pH of the external agent alone is not a good indicator for its erosive potential because biological systems tend to neutralize it. The results of this study enhance the importance of in vivo measurements and reinforce the concept of the protective action of saliva.
publishedVersion
Materia
Saliva
Mouthwashes
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
OAI Identificador
oai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/4914

id RDUUNC_90fef75618f8d0c49ad50413d3d9801c
oai_identifier_str oai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/4914
network_acronym_str RDUUNC
repository_id_str 2572
network_name_str Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
spelling Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PHBelardinelli, P. A.Morelatto, R. A.Benavidez, T. E.Baruzzi, A. M.López de Blanc, S. ASalivaMouthwashesTooth erosionTooth wearTo analyze the effect of two mouthwashes on salivary pH and correlate it with age, buffer capacity and saliva flow rate in healthy volunteers, a crossover phase IV clinical study involving three age-based groups was designed. Two commercial mouthwashes (MW), Cool Mint Listerine® (MWa) and Periobacter ® (MWb) were used. The unstimulated saliva of each individual was first characterized by measuring flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity. Salivary pH was evaluated before rinsing with a given MW, immediately after rinsing, 5 minutes later, and then every 10 min (at 15, 25, 35 min) until the baseline pH was recovered. Paired t-test, ANOVA with a randomized block design, and Pearson correlation tests were used. Averages were 0.63 mL/min, 7.06, and 0.87 for flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity, respectively. An immediate significant increase in salivary pH was observed after rinsing, reaching average values of 7.24(MWb) and 7.30 (MWa), which declined to an almost stable value 15minutes. The great increase in salivary pH, after MW use shows that saliva is a dynamic system, and that the organism is capable of responding to a stimulus with changes in its composition. It is thus evident that pH of the external agent alone is not a good indicator for its erosive potential because biological systems tend to neutralize it. The results of this study enhance the importance of in vivo measurements and reinforce the concept of the protective action of saliva.publishedVersionActa Odontológica Latinoamericana : AOL2004info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf1852-4834http://hdl.handle.net/11086/4914enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)instname:Universidad Nacional de Córdobainstacron:UNC2025-09-29T13:41:16Zoai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/4914Institucionalhttps://rdu.unc.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://rdu.unc.edu.ar/oai/snrdoca.unc@gmail.comArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:25722025-09-29 13:41:16.335Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC) - Universidad Nacional de Córdobafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
title Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
spellingShingle Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
Belardinelli, P. A.
Saliva
Mouthwashes
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
title_short Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
title_full Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
title_fullStr Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
title_full_unstemmed Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
title_sort Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Belardinelli, P. A.
Morelatto, R. A.
Benavidez, T. E.
Baruzzi, A. M.
López de Blanc, S. A
author Belardinelli, P. A.
author_facet Belardinelli, P. A.
Morelatto, R. A.
Benavidez, T. E.
Baruzzi, A. M.
López de Blanc, S. A
author_role author
author2 Morelatto, R. A.
Benavidez, T. E.
Baruzzi, A. M.
López de Blanc, S. A
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Saliva
Mouthwashes
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
topic Saliva
Mouthwashes
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv To analyze the effect of two mouthwashes on salivary pH and correlate it with age, buffer capacity and saliva flow rate in healthy volunteers, a crossover phase IV clinical study involving three age-based groups was designed. Two commercial mouthwashes (MW), Cool Mint Listerine® (MWa) and Periobacter ® (MWb) were used. The unstimulated saliva of each individual was first characterized by measuring flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity. Salivary pH was evaluated before rinsing with a given MW, immediately after rinsing, 5 minutes later, and then every 10 min (at 15, 25, 35 min) until the baseline pH was recovered. Paired t-test, ANOVA with a randomized block design, and Pearson correlation tests were used. Averages were 0.63 mL/min, 7.06, and 0.87 for flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity, respectively. An immediate significant increase in salivary pH was observed after rinsing, reaching average values of 7.24(MWb) and 7.30 (MWa), which declined to an almost stable value 15minutes. The great increase in salivary pH, after MW use shows that saliva is a dynamic system, and that the organism is capable of responding to a stimulus with changes in its composition. It is thus evident that pH of the external agent alone is not a good indicator for its erosive potential because biological systems tend to neutralize it. The results of this study enhance the importance of in vivo measurements and reinforce the concept of the protective action of saliva.
publishedVersion
description To analyze the effect of two mouthwashes on salivary pH and correlate it with age, buffer capacity and saliva flow rate in healthy volunteers, a crossover phase IV clinical study involving three age-based groups was designed. Two commercial mouthwashes (MW), Cool Mint Listerine® (MWa) and Periobacter ® (MWb) were used. The unstimulated saliva of each individual was first characterized by measuring flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity. Salivary pH was evaluated before rinsing with a given MW, immediately after rinsing, 5 minutes later, and then every 10 min (at 15, 25, 35 min) until the baseline pH was recovered. Paired t-test, ANOVA with a randomized block design, and Pearson correlation tests were used. Averages were 0.63 mL/min, 7.06, and 0.87 for flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity, respectively. An immediate significant increase in salivary pH was observed after rinsing, reaching average values of 7.24(MWb) and 7.30 (MWa), which declined to an almost stable value 15minutes. The great increase in salivary pH, after MW use shows that saliva is a dynamic system, and that the organism is capable of responding to a stimulus with changes in its composition. It is thus evident that pH of the external agent alone is not a good indicator for its erosive potential because biological systems tend to neutralize it. The results of this study enhance the importance of in vivo measurements and reinforce the concept of the protective action of saliva.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 1852-4834
http://hdl.handle.net/11086/4914
identifier_str_mv 1852-4834
url http://hdl.handle.net/11086/4914
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana : AOL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana : AOL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
instname:Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
instacron:UNC
reponame_str Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
collection Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
instacron_str UNC
institution UNC
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
repository.mail.fl_str_mv oca.unc@gmail.com
_version_ 1844618896918708225
score 13.070432