What tasks should we use in the grammar class?

Autores
Oliva, María Belén; Rolfi, Laura
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Fil: Oliva, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
Fil: Rolfi, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
The notion that grammatical knowledge structures can be differentiated according to whether they are fully automatized (implicit knowledge) or not (explicit knowledge) raises important questions for the teaching and acquisition of grammatical ability. In this presentation we will show which tasks have proved to be effective for learning implicit and explicit grammatical knowledge. The corpus was made up of 40 tests in which the students? implicit and explicit knowledge of grammar was elicited by tasks of different nature. On the one hand, the test included tasks that required the students' production and identification of particular grammar structures: They had to detect the cohesive function of certain phrases in a text, fill in blanks with suitable junctives, and finally, determine the syntactic and semantic relations held by some of the clauses in the text. On the other hand, a task was designed to have the students answer a question in writing about a particular grammar point. This aimed to assess the learners' implied knowledge of cohesion, junctives and logico-semantic relations, in a context that they would provide. The main objective of this task was to channel the students? attention to meaning and content and thus assess their "acquired" knowledge of cohesion, junctives and logico-semantic relations. To analyze the corpus, simple percentages were calculated and compared. Of all the tasks included in the test, two were analyzed quantitatively. We took into account the percentages the students obtained in the task designed to elicit explicit knowledge and these were compared to the percentages obtained in the activity designed to elicit implicit knowledge. The results show that although the students did quite well in the tasks designed to test explicit knowledge, they had not fully acquired these structures as was shown by the tasks meant to test implicit or automatized knowledge.
Fil: Oliva, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
Fil: Rolfi, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
Otras Lengua y Literatura
Materia
Taks
Grammar classes
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
OAI Identificador
oai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/29444

id RDUUNC_769f8afe7a1e8e89ae0a73bfe4df761e
oai_identifier_str oai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/29444
network_acronym_str RDUUNC
repository_id_str 2572
network_name_str Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
spelling What tasks should we use in the grammar class?Oliva, María BelénRolfi, LauraTaksGrammar classesFil: Oliva, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.Fil: Rolfi, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.The notion that grammatical knowledge structures can be differentiated according to whether they are fully automatized (implicit knowledge) or not (explicit knowledge) raises important questions for the teaching and acquisition of grammatical ability. In this presentation we will show which tasks have proved to be effective for learning implicit and explicit grammatical knowledge. The corpus was made up of 40 tests in which the students? implicit and explicit knowledge of grammar was elicited by tasks of different nature. On the one hand, the test included tasks that required the students' production and identification of particular grammar structures: They had to detect the cohesive function of certain phrases in a text, fill in blanks with suitable junctives, and finally, determine the syntactic and semantic relations held by some of the clauses in the text. On the other hand, a task was designed to have the students answer a question in writing about a particular grammar point. This aimed to assess the learners' implied knowledge of cohesion, junctives and logico-semantic relations, in a context that they would provide. The main objective of this task was to channel the students? attention to meaning and content and thus assess their "acquired" knowledge of cohesion, junctives and logico-semantic relations. To analyze the corpus, simple percentages were calculated and compared. Of all the tasks included in the test, two were analyzed quantitatively. We took into account the percentages the students obtained in the task designed to elicit explicit knowledge and these were compared to the percentages obtained in the activity designed to elicit implicit knowledge. The results show that although the students did quite well in the tasks designed to test explicit knowledge, they had not fully acquired these structures as was shown by the tasks meant to test implicit or automatized knowledge.Fil: Oliva, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.Fil: Rolfi, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.Otras Lengua y Literatura2015info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf978-987-33-9405-8http://hdl.handle.net/11086/29444enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)instname:Universidad Nacional de Córdobainstacron:UNC2025-10-16T09:31:46Zoai:rdu.unc.edu.ar:11086/29444Institucionalhttps://rdu.unc.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://rdu.unc.edu.ar/oai/snrdoca.unc@gmail.comArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:25722025-10-16 09:31:46.621Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC) - Universidad Nacional de Córdobafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
title What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
spellingShingle What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
Oliva, María Belén
Taks
Grammar classes
title_short What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
title_full What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
title_fullStr What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
title_full_unstemmed What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
title_sort What tasks should we use in the grammar class?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Oliva, María Belén
Rolfi, Laura
author Oliva, María Belén
author_facet Oliva, María Belén
Rolfi, Laura
author_role author
author2 Rolfi, Laura
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Taks
Grammar classes
topic Taks
Grammar classes
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Fil: Oliva, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
Fil: Rolfi, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
The notion that grammatical knowledge structures can be differentiated according to whether they are fully automatized (implicit knowledge) or not (explicit knowledge) raises important questions for the teaching and acquisition of grammatical ability. In this presentation we will show which tasks have proved to be effective for learning implicit and explicit grammatical knowledge. The corpus was made up of 40 tests in which the students? implicit and explicit knowledge of grammar was elicited by tasks of different nature. On the one hand, the test included tasks that required the students' production and identification of particular grammar structures: They had to detect the cohesive function of certain phrases in a text, fill in blanks with suitable junctives, and finally, determine the syntactic and semantic relations held by some of the clauses in the text. On the other hand, a task was designed to have the students answer a question in writing about a particular grammar point. This aimed to assess the learners' implied knowledge of cohesion, junctives and logico-semantic relations, in a context that they would provide. The main objective of this task was to channel the students? attention to meaning and content and thus assess their "acquired" knowledge of cohesion, junctives and logico-semantic relations. To analyze the corpus, simple percentages were calculated and compared. Of all the tasks included in the test, two were analyzed quantitatively. We took into account the percentages the students obtained in the task designed to elicit explicit knowledge and these were compared to the percentages obtained in the activity designed to elicit implicit knowledge. The results show that although the students did quite well in the tasks designed to test explicit knowledge, they had not fully acquired these structures as was shown by the tasks meant to test implicit or automatized knowledge.
Fil: Oliva, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
Fil: Rolfi, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
Otras Lengua y Literatura
description Fil: Oliva, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Lenguas; Argentina.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 978-987-33-9405-8
http://hdl.handle.net/11086/29444
identifier_str_mv 978-987-33-9405-8
url http://hdl.handle.net/11086/29444
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
instname:Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
instacron:UNC
reponame_str Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
collection Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
instacron_str UNC
institution UNC
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
repository.mail.fl_str_mv oca.unc@gmail.com
_version_ 1846143406324056064
score 12.712165