Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?

Autores
Belaus, Anabel; Fernández, Alberto Luis; Farías-Sarqui, Yamila; Bueno M., Adrián M.
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión aceptada
Descripción
Some studies have tried to assess the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) capability to detect incipient dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), but the results are not clear. The aim of this research was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the MDRS, and to localize the optimal cutoff score for MCI. Methodology. A neuropsychological battery that included the MDRS was administered to 60 older adults of both genders (Mean age=68.38, SD=6.80) in Córdoba, Argentina, who were then classified as “Control” (34 cases) or “MCI” (26 cases) according to performance in the neuropsychological evaluation, excluding the MDRS. The criteria used were those stated by the Sociedad Española de Neurología. We performed mean comparisons in order to evaluate if the MDRS was able to detect the group differences. Then, a logistic regression with the MDRS total score as the predictor variable and the group as the criterion variable was performed to determine the cutoff score. Results. Even though the mean comparisons showed a significant difference in the MDRS (p=.004), the diagnostic accuracy was only 63% with a 133 points cutoff score. The sensitivity was 42% and the specificity was 79%. Conclusions. The MDRS does not seem to be a useful tool to detect MCI since it generates numerous misclassified cases. The development of more accurate tools becomes fundamental in order to detect MCI.
Fil: Belaus, Anabel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, Alberto Luis. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades; Argentina
Fil: Farías-Sarqui, Yamila. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina
Fil: Bueno M., Bueno M. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina
Fuente
Belaus, Anabel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-8496 , Fernández, Alberto Luis ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-1066 , Farías-Sarqui, Yamila ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-1022 and Bueno M., Adrián M. (2015) Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment? Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología, 10 (1). pp. 8-13. ISSN 0718-0551
Materia
BF Psicología
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
Repositorio
Producción Académica (UCC)
Institución
Universidad Católica de Córdoba
OAI Identificador
oai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:3499

id PAUCC_4e0de75e15b0575760c956972de9fa0b
oai_identifier_str oai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:3499
network_acronym_str PAUCC
repository_id_str 2718
network_name_str Producción Académica (UCC)
spelling Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?Belaus, AnabelFernández, Alberto LuisFarías-Sarqui, YamilaBueno M., Adrián M.BF PsicologíaSome studies have tried to assess the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) capability to detect incipient dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), but the results are not clear. The aim of this research was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the MDRS, and to localize the optimal cutoff score for MCI. Methodology. A neuropsychological battery that included the MDRS was administered to 60 older adults of both genders (Mean age=68.38, SD=6.80) in Córdoba, Argentina, who were then classified as “Control” (34 cases) or “MCI” (26 cases) according to performance in the neuropsychological evaluation, excluding the MDRS. The criteria used were those stated by the Sociedad Española de Neurología. We performed mean comparisons in order to evaluate if the MDRS was able to detect the group differences. Then, a logistic regression with the MDRS total score as the predictor variable and the group as the criterion variable was performed to determine the cutoff score. Results. Even though the mean comparisons showed a significant difference in the MDRS (p=.004), the diagnostic accuracy was only 63% with a 133 points cutoff score. The sensitivity was 42% and the specificity was 79%. Conclusions. The MDRS does not seem to be a useful tool to detect MCI since it generates numerous misclassified cases. The development of more accurate tools becomes fundamental in order to detect MCI.Fil: Belaus, Anabel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, Alberto Luis. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades; ArgentinaFil: Farías-Sarqui, Yamila. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; ArgentinaFil: Bueno M., Bueno M. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; ArgentinaUniversidad de La Frontera2015-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3499/1/A_Belaus_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Far%C3%ADasSarquis_BuenoM.pdf Belaus, Anabel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-8496 <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-8496>, Fernández, Alberto Luis ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-1066 <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-1066>, Farías-Sarqui, Yamila ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-1022 <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-1022> and Bueno M., Adrián M. (2015) Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment? Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología, 10 (1). pp. 8-13. ISSN 0718-0551 reponame:Producción Académica (UCC)instname:Universidad Católica de Córdobaspahttp://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3499/https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179341106003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es2025-09-04T11:13:39Zoai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:3499instacron:UCCInstitucionalhttp://pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/Universidad privadaNo correspondehttp://pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/cgi/oai2bibdir@uccor.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:27182025-09-04 11:13:39.927Producción Académica (UCC) - Universidad Católica de Córdobafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
title Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
spellingShingle Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
Belaus, Anabel
BF Psicología
title_short Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
title_full Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
title_fullStr Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
title_sort Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Belaus, Anabel
Fernández, Alberto Luis
Farías-Sarqui, Yamila
Bueno M., Adrián M.
author Belaus, Anabel
author_facet Belaus, Anabel
Fernández, Alberto Luis
Farías-Sarqui, Yamila
Bueno M., Adrián M.
author_role author
author2 Fernández, Alberto Luis
Farías-Sarqui, Yamila
Bueno M., Adrián M.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BF Psicología
topic BF Psicología
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Some studies have tried to assess the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) capability to detect incipient dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), but the results are not clear. The aim of this research was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the MDRS, and to localize the optimal cutoff score for MCI. Methodology. A neuropsychological battery that included the MDRS was administered to 60 older adults of both genders (Mean age=68.38, SD=6.80) in Córdoba, Argentina, who were then classified as “Control” (34 cases) or “MCI” (26 cases) according to performance in the neuropsychological evaluation, excluding the MDRS. The criteria used were those stated by the Sociedad Española de Neurología. We performed mean comparisons in order to evaluate if the MDRS was able to detect the group differences. Then, a logistic regression with the MDRS total score as the predictor variable and the group as the criterion variable was performed to determine the cutoff score. Results. Even though the mean comparisons showed a significant difference in the MDRS (p=.004), the diagnostic accuracy was only 63% with a 133 points cutoff score. The sensitivity was 42% and the specificity was 79%. Conclusions. The MDRS does not seem to be a useful tool to detect MCI since it generates numerous misclassified cases. The development of more accurate tools becomes fundamental in order to detect MCI.
Fil: Belaus, Anabel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, Alberto Luis. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades; Argentina
Fil: Farías-Sarqui, Yamila. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina
Fil: Bueno M., Bueno M. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina
description Some studies have tried to assess the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) capability to detect incipient dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), but the results are not clear. The aim of this research was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the MDRS, and to localize the optimal cutoff score for MCI. Methodology. A neuropsychological battery that included the MDRS was administered to 60 older adults of both genders (Mean age=68.38, SD=6.80) in Córdoba, Argentina, who were then classified as “Control” (34 cases) or “MCI” (26 cases) according to performance in the neuropsychological evaluation, excluding the MDRS. The criteria used were those stated by the Sociedad Española de Neurología. We performed mean comparisons in order to evaluate if the MDRS was able to detect the group differences. Then, a logistic regression with the MDRS total score as the predictor variable and the group as the criterion variable was performed to determine the cutoff score. Results. Even though the mean comparisons showed a significant difference in the MDRS (p=.004), the diagnostic accuracy was only 63% with a 133 points cutoff score. The sensitivity was 42% and the specificity was 79%. Conclusions. The MDRS does not seem to be a useful tool to detect MCI since it generates numerous misclassified cases. The development of more accurate tools becomes fundamental in order to detect MCI.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3499/1/A_Belaus_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Far%C3%ADasSarquis_BuenoM.pdf
url http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3499/1/A_Belaus_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Far%C3%ADasSarquis_BuenoM.pdf
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3499/
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179341106003
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de La Frontera
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de La Frontera
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Belaus, Anabel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-8496 <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-8496>, Fernández, Alberto Luis ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-1066 <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-1066>, Farías-Sarqui, Yamila ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-1022 <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-1022> and Bueno M., Adrián M. (2015) Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment? Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología, 10 (1). pp. 8-13. ISSN 0718-0551
reponame:Producción Académica (UCC)
instname:Universidad Católica de Córdoba
reponame_str Producción Académica (UCC)
collection Producción Académica (UCC)
instname_str Universidad Católica de Córdoba
repository.name.fl_str_mv Producción Académica (UCC) - Universidad Católica de Córdoba
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibdir@uccor.edu.ar
_version_ 1842344088059248640
score 12.623145