Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina

Autores
Acreche, Martin Moises; Portocarrero, Rocio; Chalco Vera, Jorge Elias; Danert, Fátima Carolina; Valeiro, Alejandro Hector
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere are increasing due to anthropogenic actions, and agriculture is one of the most important contributors. This study quantified GHG emissions from green-cane harvested sugarcane with and without post-harvest burning in Tucumán (Argentina). A field trial was conducted in Tucumán during the 2011/2012 season using a randomised complete-block design with four replications. Treatments were: (a) harvest without sugarcane burning (neither before nor after), and (b) harvest with trash burnt after harvest. The method used to capture gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) in the crop cycle was based on closed-vented chambers, while quantification was by gas chromatography. There were significant emission rates of CO2 and N2O during the sugarcane cycle in Tucumán, but no evidence of CH4 emissions or uptakes. N2O and CO2 emission rates were higher in the no-burning treatment than in the burnt, but only in part of the crop cycle. The former is apparently associated with the application of nitrogen fertiliser, while the higher CO2 emissions seem to be associated with trash retention. There were no significant correlations between environmental factors and emission rates. Although these results seem pessimistic, in the context of an entire crop GHG balance (including the emissions due to burning before or after harvest) green-cane harvesting without burning could effectively lead to a reduction of total GHG emissions during the crop cycle.
EEA Famaillá
Fil: Acreche, Martin Moises. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Portocarrero, Rocio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina
Fil: Chalco Vera, Jorge Elias. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Danert, C. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia; Argentina
Fil: Valeiro, Alejandro Hector. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina.
Fuente
Sugar Tech 16 (2) : 195–199 (June 2014)
Materia
Caña de Azúcar
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Tecnología Postcosecha
Dióxido de Carbono
Emisiones de Metano
Sugarcane
Greenhouse Gases
Postharvest Technology
Carbon Dioxide
Methane Emission
Tucumán
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3270
Acceder
id INTADig_ef02ce2c44ddd5b534c532dc0ce55996
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3270
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, ArgentinaAcreche, Martin MoisesPortocarrero, RocioChalco Vera, Jorge EliasDanert, Fátima CarolinaValeiro, Alejandro HectorCaña de AzúcarGases de Efecto InvernaderoTecnología PostcosechaDióxido de CarbonoEmisiones de MetanoSugarcaneGreenhouse GasesPostharvest TechnologyCarbon DioxideMethane EmissionTucumánConcentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere are increasing due to anthropogenic actions, and agriculture is one of the most important contributors. This study quantified GHG emissions from green-cane harvested sugarcane with and without post-harvest burning in Tucumán (Argentina). A field trial was conducted in Tucumán during the 2011/2012 season using a randomised complete-block design with four replications. Treatments were: (a) harvest without sugarcane burning (neither before nor after), and (b) harvest with trash burnt after harvest. The method used to capture gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) in the crop cycle was based on closed-vented chambers, while quantification was by gas chromatography. There were significant emission rates of CO2 and N2O during the sugarcane cycle in Tucumán, but no evidence of CH4 emissions or uptakes. N2O and CO2 emission rates were higher in the no-burning treatment than in the burnt, but only in part of the crop cycle. The former is apparently associated with the application of nitrogen fertiliser, while the higher CO2 emissions seem to be associated with trash retention. There were no significant correlations between environmental factors and emission rates. Although these results seem pessimistic, in the context of an entire crop GHG balance (including the emissions due to burning before or after harvest) green-cane harvesting without burning could effectively lead to a reduction of total GHG emissions during the crop cycle.EEA FamailláFil: Acreche, Martin Moises. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Portocarrero, Rocio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; ArgentinaFil: Chalco Vera, Jorge Elias. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Danert, C. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia; ArgentinaFil: Valeiro, Alejandro Hector. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina.2018-08-31T15:27:34Z2018-08-31T15:27:34Z2014-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/32700972-15250974-0740https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5Sugar Tech 16 (2) : 195–199 (June 2014)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:17Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/3270instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:18.137INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
title Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
spellingShingle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
Acreche, Martin Moises
Caña de Azúcar
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Tecnología Postcosecha
Dióxido de Carbono
Emisiones de Metano
Sugarcane
Greenhouse Gases
Postharvest Technology
Carbon Dioxide
Methane Emission
Tucumán
title_short Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
title_full Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
title_fullStr Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
title_sort Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Acreche, Martin Moises
Portocarrero, Rocio
Chalco Vera, Jorge Elias
Danert, Fátima Carolina
Valeiro, Alejandro Hector
author Acreche, Martin Moises
author_facet Acreche, Martin Moises
Portocarrero, Rocio
Chalco Vera, Jorge Elias
Danert, Fátima Carolina
Valeiro, Alejandro Hector
author_role author
author2 Portocarrero, Rocio
Chalco Vera, Jorge Elias
Danert, Fátima Carolina
Valeiro, Alejandro Hector
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Caña de Azúcar
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Tecnología Postcosecha
Dióxido de Carbono
Emisiones de Metano
Sugarcane
Greenhouse Gases
Postharvest Technology
Carbon Dioxide
Methane Emission
Tucumán
topic Caña de Azúcar
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Tecnología Postcosecha
Dióxido de Carbono
Emisiones de Metano
Sugarcane
Greenhouse Gases
Postharvest Technology
Carbon Dioxide
Methane Emission
Tucumán
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere are increasing due to anthropogenic actions, and agriculture is one of the most important contributors. This study quantified GHG emissions from green-cane harvested sugarcane with and without post-harvest burning in Tucumán (Argentina). A field trial was conducted in Tucumán during the 2011/2012 season using a randomised complete-block design with four replications. Treatments were: (a) harvest without sugarcane burning (neither before nor after), and (b) harvest with trash burnt after harvest. The method used to capture gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) in the crop cycle was based on closed-vented chambers, while quantification was by gas chromatography. There were significant emission rates of CO2 and N2O during the sugarcane cycle in Tucumán, but no evidence of CH4 emissions or uptakes. N2O and CO2 emission rates were higher in the no-burning treatment than in the burnt, but only in part of the crop cycle. The former is apparently associated with the application of nitrogen fertiliser, while the higher CO2 emissions seem to be associated with trash retention. There were no significant correlations between environmental factors and emission rates. Although these results seem pessimistic, in the context of an entire crop GHG balance (including the emissions due to burning before or after harvest) green-cane harvesting without burning could effectively lead to a reduction of total GHG emissions during the crop cycle.
EEA Famaillá
Fil: Acreche, Martin Moises. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Portocarrero, Rocio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina
Fil: Chalco Vera, Jorge Elias. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Danert, C. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia; Argentina
Fil: Valeiro, Alejandro Hector. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; Argentina.
description Concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere are increasing due to anthropogenic actions, and agriculture is one of the most important contributors. This study quantified GHG emissions from green-cane harvested sugarcane with and without post-harvest burning in Tucumán (Argentina). A field trial was conducted in Tucumán during the 2011/2012 season using a randomised complete-block design with four replications. Treatments were: (a) harvest without sugarcane burning (neither before nor after), and (b) harvest with trash burnt after harvest. The method used to capture gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) in the crop cycle was based on closed-vented chambers, while quantification was by gas chromatography. There were significant emission rates of CO2 and N2O during the sugarcane cycle in Tucumán, but no evidence of CH4 emissions or uptakes. N2O and CO2 emission rates were higher in the no-burning treatment than in the burnt, but only in part of the crop cycle. The former is apparently associated with the application of nitrogen fertiliser, while the higher CO2 emissions seem to be associated with trash retention. There were no significant correlations between environmental factors and emission rates. Although these results seem pessimistic, in the context of an entire crop GHG balance (including the emissions due to burning before or after harvest) green-cane harvesting without burning could effectively lead to a reduction of total GHG emissions during the crop cycle.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06
2018-08-31T15:27:34Z
2018-08-31T15:27:34Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3270
0972-1525
0974-0740
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5
url https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3270
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5
identifier_str_mv 0972-1525
0974-0740
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sugar Tech 16 (2) : 195–199 (June 2014)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143504816799744
score 12.712165

Publicaciones similares