Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer...

Autores
Ferre, Luis Bernardo; Chitwood, James L.; Fresno, Cristóbal; Ortega, Hugo Hector; Kjelland, Michael E.; Ross, Pablo J.
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Straws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.
EEA Rafaela
Fil: Ferre, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina.
Fil: Chitwood, James L. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fresno, C. National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Computational Genomics Division; México
Fil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina.
Fil: Kjelland, M.E. Conservation, Genetics and Biotech, LLCVicksburg; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ross, Pablo J. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Reproduction in Domestic Animals 53 (1) : 26-33 (February 2018)
Materia
Reproducción
Espermatozoo
Fecundación in Vitro
Centrifugación
Coloides
Reproduction
Spermatozoa
In Vitro Fertilization
Centrifuging
Colloids
Esperma
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2879

id INTADig_ed52f03ea42121138cfa634236310c41
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2879
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzerFerre, Luis BernardoChitwood, James L.Fresno, CristóbalOrtega, Hugo HectorKjelland, Michael E.Ross, Pablo J.ReproducciónEspermatozooFecundación in VitroCentrifugaciónColoidesReproductionSpermatozoaIn Vitro FertilizationCentrifugingColloidsEspermaStraws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.EEA RafaelaFil: Ferre, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina.Fil: Chitwood, James L. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados UnidosFil: Fresno, C. National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Computational Genomics Division; MéxicoFil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina.Fil: Kjelland, M.E. Conservation, Genetics and Biotech, LLCVicksburg; Estados UnidosFil: Ross, Pablo J. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados UnidosWiley2018-07-25T17:39:23Z2018-07-25T17:39:23Z2018-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2879https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rda.130480936-67681439-0531https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048Reproduction in Domestic Animals 53 (1) : 26-33 (February 2018)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSA/1115053/AR. Balcarce, Buenos Aires/Biotecnologías reproductivas y desarrollo de metodologías de diagnóstico, control y prevención de las enfermedades infecciosas y parasitarias que afectan la concepción, gestación y período neonatal en especies de interés zootécnico.info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:22Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2879instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:22.927INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
title Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
spellingShingle Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
Ferre, Luis Bernardo
Reproducción
Espermatozoo
Fecundación in Vitro
Centrifugación
Coloides
Reproduction
Spermatozoa
In Vitro Fertilization
Centrifuging
Colloids
Esperma
title_short Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
title_full Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
title_fullStr Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
title_sort Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ferre, Luis Bernardo
Chitwood, James L.
Fresno, Cristóbal
Ortega, Hugo Hector
Kjelland, Michael E.
Ross, Pablo J.
author Ferre, Luis Bernardo
author_facet Ferre, Luis Bernardo
Chitwood, James L.
Fresno, Cristóbal
Ortega, Hugo Hector
Kjelland, Michael E.
Ross, Pablo J.
author_role author
author2 Chitwood, James L.
Fresno, Cristóbal
Ortega, Hugo Hector
Kjelland, Michael E.
Ross, Pablo J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Reproducción
Espermatozoo
Fecundación in Vitro
Centrifugación
Coloides
Reproduction
Spermatozoa
In Vitro Fertilization
Centrifuging
Colloids
Esperma
topic Reproducción
Espermatozoo
Fecundación in Vitro
Centrifugación
Coloides
Reproduction
Spermatozoa
In Vitro Fertilization
Centrifuging
Colloids
Esperma
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Straws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.
EEA Rafaela
Fil: Ferre, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina.
Fil: Chitwood, James L. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fresno, C. National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Computational Genomics Division; México
Fil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina.
Fil: Kjelland, M.E. Conservation, Genetics and Biotech, LLCVicksburg; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ross, Pablo J. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos
description Straws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-25T17:39:23Z
2018-07-25T17:39:23Z
2018-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2879
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rda.13048
0936-6768
1439-0531
https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2879
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rda.13048
https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048
identifier_str_mv 0936-6768
1439-0531
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSA/1115053/AR. Balcarce, Buenos Aires/Biotecnologías reproductivas y desarrollo de metodologías de diagnóstico, control y prevención de las enfermedades infecciosas y parasitarias que afectan la concepción, gestación y período neonatal en especies de interés zootécnico.
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reproduction in Domestic Animals 53 (1) : 26-33 (February 2018)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619124288782336
score 12.891075