Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer...
- Autores
- Ferre, Luis Bernardo; Chitwood, James L.; Fresno, Cristóbal; Ortega, Hugo Hector; Kjelland, Michael E.; Ross, Pablo J.
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Straws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.
EEA Rafaela
Fil: Ferre, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina.
Fil: Chitwood, James L. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fresno, C. National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Computational Genomics Division; México
Fil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina.
Fil: Kjelland, M.E. Conservation, Genetics and Biotech, LLCVicksburg; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ross, Pablo J. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos - Fuente
- Reproduction in Domestic Animals 53 (1) : 26-33 (February 2018)
- Materia
-
Reproducción
Espermatozoo
Fecundación in Vitro
Centrifugación
Coloides
Reproduction
Spermatozoa
In Vitro Fertilization
Centrifuging
Colloids
Esperma - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2879
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_ed52f03ea42121138cfa634236310c41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2879 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzerFerre, Luis BernardoChitwood, James L.Fresno, CristóbalOrtega, Hugo HectorKjelland, Michael E.Ross, Pablo J.ReproducciónEspermatozooFecundación in VitroCentrifugaciónColoidesReproductionSpermatozoaIn Vitro FertilizationCentrifugingColloidsEspermaStraws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.EEA RafaelaFil: Ferre, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina.Fil: Chitwood, James L. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados UnidosFil: Fresno, C. National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Computational Genomics Division; MéxicoFil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina.Fil: Kjelland, M.E. Conservation, Genetics and Biotech, LLCVicksburg; Estados UnidosFil: Ross, Pablo J. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados UnidosWiley2018-07-25T17:39:23Z2018-07-25T17:39:23Z2018-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2879https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rda.130480936-67681439-0531https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048Reproduction in Domestic Animals 53 (1) : 26-33 (February 2018)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSA/1115053/AR. Balcarce, Buenos Aires/Biotecnologías reproductivas y desarrollo de metodologías de diagnóstico, control y prevención de las enfermedades infecciosas y parasitarias que afectan la concepción, gestación y período neonatal en especies de interés zootécnico.info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:22Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2879instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:22.927INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer |
title |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer |
spellingShingle |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer Ferre, Luis Bernardo Reproducción Espermatozoo Fecundación in Vitro Centrifugación Coloides Reproduction Spermatozoa In Vitro Fertilization Centrifuging Colloids Esperma |
title_short |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer |
title_full |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer |
title_sort |
Effect of different mini‐volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer‐assisted semen analyzer |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ferre, Luis Bernardo Chitwood, James L. Fresno, Cristóbal Ortega, Hugo Hector Kjelland, Michael E. Ross, Pablo J. |
author |
Ferre, Luis Bernardo |
author_facet |
Ferre, Luis Bernardo Chitwood, James L. Fresno, Cristóbal Ortega, Hugo Hector Kjelland, Michael E. Ross, Pablo J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chitwood, James L. Fresno, Cristóbal Ortega, Hugo Hector Kjelland, Michael E. Ross, Pablo J. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducción Espermatozoo Fecundación in Vitro Centrifugación Coloides Reproduction Spermatozoa In Vitro Fertilization Centrifuging Colloids Esperma |
topic |
Reproducción Espermatozoo Fecundación in Vitro Centrifugación Coloides Reproduction Spermatozoa In Vitro Fertilization Centrifuging Colloids Esperma |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Straws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis. EEA Rafaela Fil: Ferre, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Fil: Chitwood, James L. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos Fil: Fresno, C. National Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN). Computational Genomics Division; México Fil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Fil: Kjelland, M.E. Conservation, Genetics and Biotech, LLCVicksburg; Estados Unidos Fil: Ross, Pablo J. University of California Davis. Department of Animal Science; Estados Unidos |
description |
Straws of sex‐sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex‐sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane‐coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex‐sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex‐sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini‐volume single‐layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini‐volume two‐layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex‐sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two‐layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single‐layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p < .0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p < .05). The mini‐volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two‐layer centrifugation configuration for sex‐sorted sperm selection. In addition, single‐layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-25T17:39:23Z 2018-07-25T17:39:23Z 2018-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2879 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rda.13048 0936-6768 1439-0531 https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2879 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rda.13048 https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048 |
identifier_str_mv |
0936-6768 1439-0531 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSA/1115053/AR. Balcarce, Buenos Aires/Biotecnologías reproductivas y desarrollo de metodologías de diagnóstico, control y prevención de las enfermedades infecciosas y parasitarias que afectan la concepción, gestación y período neonatal en especies de interés zootécnico. |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproduction in Domestic Animals 53 (1) : 26-33 (February 2018) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619124288782336 |
score |
12.891075 |