Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions

Autores
Rizzo, Pedro Federico; Aguado, German Dario; Funes Pinter, Mariano Ivan; Martinez, Laura Elizabeth; Ferrari, Florencia; De Biazi, Federico Sebastian; Martín, Pablo; Flores, Gustavo; Sánchez, Antoni; Uliarte, Ernesto Martin
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Agro-industrial activities generate significant amounts of organic waste and a variety of effluents thus posing environmental challenges. Viticulture in Argentina, which covered 204,847 ha in 2023, faces water scarcity as a limiting factor conditioning its production. This industry produces large volumes of grape marc, sediments, and stalks, which can be valorised into products like alcohol, tartaric acid, and compost. However, these valorisation processes generate effluents with high organic load and salinity, further stressing water resources. This study explores the potential of utilising these effluents to cultivate plant biomass in arid regions (sorghum or perennial pasture), which could serve as bioenergy, animal feed, or composting co-substrates, contributing to circular bioeconomy principles. The combined use of effluent as a water resource and the sowing of sorghum and pasture increased soil organic matter content and led to a slight reduction in pH (depth: 0.30–0.60 m) compared to the control treatment. The sorghum plots showed better establishment and higher dry biomass yield (32.6 Tn/ha) compared to the pasture plots (6.5 Tn/ha). Sorghum demonstrated better tolerance to saline soils and high salinity effluents, aligning with previous studies. Although pasture had a lower biomass yield, it was more efficient in nutrient uptake, concentrating more NPK, ash, and soluble salts. Sorghum’s higher yield compensated for its lower nutrient concentration. For biomass production, sorghum is preferable, but if nutrient capture from effluents is prioritised, summer polyphytic pastures are more suitable. These results suggest that the final selection between plant biomass alternatives highly depends on whether the goal is biomass generation or nutrient capture.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Rizzo, Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Aguado, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Funes-Pinter, Iván. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Funes-Pinter, Iván. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. CCT Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Martínez, Laura Elizabeth. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rama Caída; Argentina.
Fil: Ferrari, Florencia Noemí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: De Biazi, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Pablo, Martín. Empresa DERVINSA SA; Mendoza, Argentina.
Fil: Flores, Gustavo. Empresa DERVINSA SA; Mendoza, Argentina.
Fil: Sánchez, Antoni. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Grupo de Investigación en Compostaje; España.
Fil: Uliarte, Ernesto Martín. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fuente
Applied Sciences 15 (3) : 1435. (January 2025)
Materia
Biomasa
Efluentes
Bioenergía
Industria del Vino
Biomass
Effluents
Bioenergy
Wine Industry
Efluentes de Destilería
Bioeconomía Circular
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21156
Acceder
id INTADig_e6392b6b00ac80c0f1ef32f459299ec3
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21156
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid RegionsRizzo, Pedro FedericoAguado, German DarioFunes Pinter, Mariano IvanMartinez, Laura ElizabethFerrari, FlorenciaDe Biazi, Federico SebastianMartín, PabloFlores, GustavoSánchez, AntoniUliarte, Ernesto MartinBiomasaEfluentesBioenergíaIndustria del VinoBiomassEffluentsBioenergyWine IndustryEfluentes de DestileríaBioeconomía CircularAgro-industrial activities generate significant amounts of organic waste and a variety of effluents thus posing environmental challenges. Viticulture in Argentina, which covered 204,847 ha in 2023, faces water scarcity as a limiting factor conditioning its production. This industry produces large volumes of grape marc, sediments, and stalks, which can be valorised into products like alcohol, tartaric acid, and compost. However, these valorisation processes generate effluents with high organic load and salinity, further stressing water resources. This study explores the potential of utilising these effluents to cultivate plant biomass in arid regions (sorghum or perennial pasture), which could serve as bioenergy, animal feed, or composting co-substrates, contributing to circular bioeconomy principles. The combined use of effluent as a water resource and the sowing of sorghum and pasture increased soil organic matter content and led to a slight reduction in pH (depth: 0.30–0.60 m) compared to the control treatment. The sorghum plots showed better establishment and higher dry biomass yield (32.6 Tn/ha) compared to the pasture plots (6.5 Tn/ha). Sorghum demonstrated better tolerance to saline soils and high salinity effluents, aligning with previous studies. Although pasture had a lower biomass yield, it was more efficient in nutrient uptake, concentrating more NPK, ash, and soluble salts. Sorghum’s higher yield compensated for its lower nutrient concentration. For biomass production, sorghum is preferable, but if nutrient capture from effluents is prioritised, summer polyphytic pastures are more suitable. These results suggest that the final selection between plant biomass alternatives highly depends on whether the goal is biomass generation or nutrient capture.EEA MendozaFil: Rizzo, Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Aguado, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Funes-Pinter, Iván. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Funes-Pinter, Iván. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. CCT Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Martínez, Laura Elizabeth. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rama Caída; Argentina.Fil: Ferrari, Florencia Noemí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: De Biazi, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Pablo, Martín. Empresa DERVINSA SA; Mendoza, Argentina.Fil: Flores, Gustavo. Empresa DERVINSA SA; Mendoza, Argentina.Fil: Sánchez, Antoni. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Grupo de Investigación en Compostaje; España.Fil: Uliarte, Ernesto Martín. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaMDPI2025-02-10T12:50:42Z2025-02-10T12:50:42Z2025-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21156https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/3/14352076-3417https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031435Applied Sciences 15 (3) : 1435. (January 2025)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaspainfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2023-PD-L04-I122, Gestión de las biomasas del SAB y estrategias tecnológicas para su transformación en bioproductos de valor agregadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:50:53Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/21156instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:50:54.525INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
title Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
spellingShingle Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
Rizzo, Pedro Federico
Biomasa
Efluentes
Bioenergía
Industria del Vino
Biomass
Effluents
Bioenergy
Wine Industry
Efluentes de Destilería
Bioeconomía Circular
title_short Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
title_full Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
title_fullStr Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
title_full_unstemmed Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
title_sort Effluent from Winery Waste Biorefinery: A Strategic Input for Biomass Generation with Different Objectives to Add Value in Arid Regions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rizzo, Pedro Federico
Aguado, German Dario
Funes Pinter, Mariano Ivan
Martinez, Laura Elizabeth
Ferrari, Florencia
De Biazi, Federico Sebastian
Martín, Pablo
Flores, Gustavo
Sánchez, Antoni
Uliarte, Ernesto Martin
author Rizzo, Pedro Federico
author_facet Rizzo, Pedro Federico
Aguado, German Dario
Funes Pinter, Mariano Ivan
Martinez, Laura Elizabeth
Ferrari, Florencia
De Biazi, Federico Sebastian
Martín, Pablo
Flores, Gustavo
Sánchez, Antoni
Uliarte, Ernesto Martin
author_role author
author2 Aguado, German Dario
Funes Pinter, Mariano Ivan
Martinez, Laura Elizabeth
Ferrari, Florencia
De Biazi, Federico Sebastian
Martín, Pablo
Flores, Gustavo
Sánchez, Antoni
Uliarte, Ernesto Martin
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomasa
Efluentes
Bioenergía
Industria del Vino
Biomass
Effluents
Bioenergy
Wine Industry
Efluentes de Destilería
Bioeconomía Circular
topic Biomasa
Efluentes
Bioenergía
Industria del Vino
Biomass
Effluents
Bioenergy
Wine Industry
Efluentes de Destilería
Bioeconomía Circular
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Agro-industrial activities generate significant amounts of organic waste and a variety of effluents thus posing environmental challenges. Viticulture in Argentina, which covered 204,847 ha in 2023, faces water scarcity as a limiting factor conditioning its production. This industry produces large volumes of grape marc, sediments, and stalks, which can be valorised into products like alcohol, tartaric acid, and compost. However, these valorisation processes generate effluents with high organic load and salinity, further stressing water resources. This study explores the potential of utilising these effluents to cultivate plant biomass in arid regions (sorghum or perennial pasture), which could serve as bioenergy, animal feed, or composting co-substrates, contributing to circular bioeconomy principles. The combined use of effluent as a water resource and the sowing of sorghum and pasture increased soil organic matter content and led to a slight reduction in pH (depth: 0.30–0.60 m) compared to the control treatment. The sorghum plots showed better establishment and higher dry biomass yield (32.6 Tn/ha) compared to the pasture plots (6.5 Tn/ha). Sorghum demonstrated better tolerance to saline soils and high salinity effluents, aligning with previous studies. Although pasture had a lower biomass yield, it was more efficient in nutrient uptake, concentrating more NPK, ash, and soluble salts. Sorghum’s higher yield compensated for its lower nutrient concentration. For biomass production, sorghum is preferable, but if nutrient capture from effluents is prioritised, summer polyphytic pastures are more suitable. These results suggest that the final selection between plant biomass alternatives highly depends on whether the goal is biomass generation or nutrient capture.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Rizzo, Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Aguado, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Funes-Pinter, Iván. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Funes-Pinter, Iván. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. CCT Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Martínez, Laura Elizabeth. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rama Caída; Argentina.
Fil: Ferrari, Florencia Noemí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: De Biazi, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Pablo, Martín. Empresa DERVINSA SA; Mendoza, Argentina.
Fil: Flores, Gustavo. Empresa DERVINSA SA; Mendoza, Argentina.
Fil: Sánchez, Antoni. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Grupo de Investigación en Compostaje; España.
Fil: Uliarte, Ernesto Martín. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
description Agro-industrial activities generate significant amounts of organic waste and a variety of effluents thus posing environmental challenges. Viticulture in Argentina, which covered 204,847 ha in 2023, faces water scarcity as a limiting factor conditioning its production. This industry produces large volumes of grape marc, sediments, and stalks, which can be valorised into products like alcohol, tartaric acid, and compost. However, these valorisation processes generate effluents with high organic load and salinity, further stressing water resources. This study explores the potential of utilising these effluents to cultivate plant biomass in arid regions (sorghum or perennial pasture), which could serve as bioenergy, animal feed, or composting co-substrates, contributing to circular bioeconomy principles. The combined use of effluent as a water resource and the sowing of sorghum and pasture increased soil organic matter content and led to a slight reduction in pH (depth: 0.30–0.60 m) compared to the control treatment. The sorghum plots showed better establishment and higher dry biomass yield (32.6 Tn/ha) compared to the pasture plots (6.5 Tn/ha). Sorghum demonstrated better tolerance to saline soils and high salinity effluents, aligning with previous studies. Although pasture had a lower biomass yield, it was more efficient in nutrient uptake, concentrating more NPK, ash, and soluble salts. Sorghum’s higher yield compensated for its lower nutrient concentration. For biomass production, sorghum is preferable, but if nutrient capture from effluents is prioritised, summer polyphytic pastures are more suitable. These results suggest that the final selection between plant biomass alternatives highly depends on whether the goal is biomass generation or nutrient capture.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-02-10T12:50:42Z
2025-02-10T12:50:42Z
2025-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21156
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/3/1435
2076-3417
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031435
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21156
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/3/1435
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031435
identifier_str_mv 2076-3417
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2023-PD-L04-I122, Gestión de las biomasas del SAB y estrategias tecnológicas para su transformación en bioproductos de valor agregado
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Applied Sciences 15 (3) : 1435. (January 2025)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341435376926720
score 12.623145

Publicaciones similares