Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2

Autores
Curti, Lucía Ana; Primost, Ivana; Valla, Sofia; Ibañez Alegre, Daiana; Olguin Perglione, Cecilia; Repizo, Guillermo Daniel; Lara, Julia; Parcerisa, Ivana; Palacios, Antonela; Llases, María Eugenia; Rinflerch, Adriana; Barrios, Melanie; Pereyra Bonnet, Federico; Gimenez, Carla Alejandra; Marcone, Débora Natalia
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We evaluated a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection (Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit) based on reverse transcription, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR-Cas12 reaction. From a total of 210 RNA samples extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs using spin columns, the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 105/105 (100%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.55–100) positive samples and 104/105 (99.05%; 95% CI: 94.81–99.97) negative samples that were previously tested using commercial RT-qPCR. The estimated overall Kappa index was 0.991, reflecting an almost perfect concordance level between the two diagnostic tests. An initial validation test was also performed on 30 nasopharyngeal samples collected in lysis buffer, in which the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 20/21 (95.24%; 95% CI: 76.18–99.88) positive samples and 9/9 (100%; 95% CI: 66.37–100) negative samples. The estimated Kappa index was 0.923, indicating a strong concordance between the test procedures. The Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was suitable for detecting a wide range of RT-qPCR-positive samples (cycle threshold range: 11.45–36.90) and dilutions of heat-inactivated virus (range: 2.5–100 copies/µL); no cross-reaction was observed with the other respiratory pathogens tested. We demonstrated that the performance of the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was similar to that of commercial RT-qPCR, as the former was highly sensitive and specific, timesaving (1.5 h), inexpensive, and did not require sophisticated equipment. The use of this kit would reduce the time taken for diagnosis and facilitate molecular diagnosis in low-resource laboratories.
Instituto de Virología
Fil: Curti, Lucía Ana. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Primost, Ivana. Hospital Municipal de Trauma y Emergencias Dr. Federico Abete. Genetics and Molecular Biology Laboratory; Argentina
Fil: Valla, Sofia. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CITNOBA). Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas (CIBA); Argentina
Fil: Valla, Sofia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ibañez Alegre, Daiana. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Laboratorio Grupo de Investigación en Genética Aplicada (GIGA); Argentina
Fil: Ibañez Alegre, Daiana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Olguin Perglione, Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina
Fil: Olguin Perglione, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Repizo, Guillermo Daniel. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lara, Julia. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Parcerisa, Ivana. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Palacios, Antonela. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Llases, María Eugenia. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rinflerch, Adriana. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Laboratorio Grupo de Investigación en Genética Aplicada (GIGA); Argentina
Fil: Rinflerch, Adriana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Barrios, Melanie. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Producción Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gimenez, Carla Alejandra. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marcone, Débora Natalia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Microbiología, Inmunología, Biotecnología y Genética. Cátedra de Virología; Argentina
Fil: Marcone, Débora Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fuente
Viruses 13 (3) : 420 (Marzo 2021)
Materia
CRISPR
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
COVID-19
Diagnosis
Fluorescence
Freeze Drying
Repeticiones Palindrómicas Cortas Agrupadas y Regularmente Interespaciadas
Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave 2
Diagnóstico
Fluorescencia
Liofilización
SARS-CoV-2
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/9128

id INTADig_e38ddda9784017f4c8714abc2fc0dca3
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/9128
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2Curti, Lucía AnaPrimost, IvanaValla, SofiaIbañez Alegre, DaianaOlguin Perglione, CeciliaRepizo, Guillermo DanielLara, JuliaParcerisa, IvanaPalacios, AntonelaLlases, María EugeniaRinflerch, AdrianaBarrios, MelaniePereyra Bonnet, FedericoGimenez, Carla AlejandraMarcone, Débora NataliaCRISPRSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2COVID-19DiagnosisFluorescenceFreeze DryingRepeticiones Palindrómicas Cortas Agrupadas y Regularmente InterespaciadasCoronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave 2DiagnósticoFluorescenciaLiofilizaciónSARS-CoV-2We evaluated a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection (Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit) based on reverse transcription, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR-Cas12 reaction. From a total of 210 RNA samples extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs using spin columns, the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 105/105 (100%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.55–100) positive samples and 104/105 (99.05%; 95% CI: 94.81–99.97) negative samples that were previously tested using commercial RT-qPCR. The estimated overall Kappa index was 0.991, reflecting an almost perfect concordance level between the two diagnostic tests. An initial validation test was also performed on 30 nasopharyngeal samples collected in lysis buffer, in which the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 20/21 (95.24%; 95% CI: 76.18–99.88) positive samples and 9/9 (100%; 95% CI: 66.37–100) negative samples. The estimated Kappa index was 0.923, indicating a strong concordance between the test procedures. The Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was suitable for detecting a wide range of RT-qPCR-positive samples (cycle threshold range: 11.45–36.90) and dilutions of heat-inactivated virus (range: 2.5–100 copies/µL); no cross-reaction was observed with the other respiratory pathogens tested. We demonstrated that the performance of the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was similar to that of commercial RT-qPCR, as the former was highly sensitive and specific, timesaving (1.5 h), inexpensive, and did not require sophisticated equipment. The use of this kit would reduce the time taken for diagnosis and facilitate molecular diagnosis in low-resource laboratories.Instituto de VirologíaFil: Curti, Lucía Ana. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Primost, Ivana. Hospital Municipal de Trauma y Emergencias Dr. Federico Abete. Genetics and Molecular Biology Laboratory; ArgentinaFil: Valla, Sofia. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CITNOBA). Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas (CIBA); ArgentinaFil: Valla, Sofia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Ibañez Alegre, Daiana. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Laboratorio Grupo de Investigación en Genética Aplicada (GIGA); ArgentinaFil: Ibañez Alegre, Daiana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Olguin Perglione, Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; ArgentinaFil: Olguin Perglione, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Repizo, Guillermo Daniel. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Lara, Julia. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Parcerisa, Ivana. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Palacios, Antonela. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Llases, María Eugenia. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Rinflerch, Adriana. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Laboratorio Grupo de Investigación en Genética Aplicada (GIGA); ArgentinaFil: Rinflerch, Adriana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Barrios, Melanie. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Producción Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Gimenez, Carla Alejandra. CASPR Biotech; Estados UnidosFil: Marcone, Débora Natalia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Microbiología, Inmunología, Biotecnología y Genética. Cátedra de Virología; ArgentinaFil: Marcone, Débora Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaMDPI2021-04-19T17:40:04Z2021-04-19T17:40:04Z2021-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9128https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/3/4201999-4915https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030420Viruses 13 (3) : 420 (Marzo 2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:45:11Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/9128instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:11.824INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
title Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
spellingShingle Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
Curti, Lucía Ana
CRISPR
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
COVID-19
Diagnosis
Fluorescence
Freeze Drying
Repeticiones Palindrómicas Cortas Agrupadas y Regularmente Interespaciadas
Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave 2
Diagnóstico
Fluorescencia
Liofilización
SARS-CoV-2
title_short Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort Evaluation of a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for a sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Curti, Lucía Ana
Primost, Ivana
Valla, Sofia
Ibañez Alegre, Daiana
Olguin Perglione, Cecilia
Repizo, Guillermo Daniel
Lara, Julia
Parcerisa, Ivana
Palacios, Antonela
Llases, María Eugenia
Rinflerch, Adriana
Barrios, Melanie
Pereyra Bonnet, Federico
Gimenez, Carla Alejandra
Marcone, Débora Natalia
author Curti, Lucía Ana
author_facet Curti, Lucía Ana
Primost, Ivana
Valla, Sofia
Ibañez Alegre, Daiana
Olguin Perglione, Cecilia
Repizo, Guillermo Daniel
Lara, Julia
Parcerisa, Ivana
Palacios, Antonela
Llases, María Eugenia
Rinflerch, Adriana
Barrios, Melanie
Pereyra Bonnet, Federico
Gimenez, Carla Alejandra
Marcone, Débora Natalia
author_role author
author2 Primost, Ivana
Valla, Sofia
Ibañez Alegre, Daiana
Olguin Perglione, Cecilia
Repizo, Guillermo Daniel
Lara, Julia
Parcerisa, Ivana
Palacios, Antonela
Llases, María Eugenia
Rinflerch, Adriana
Barrios, Melanie
Pereyra Bonnet, Federico
Gimenez, Carla Alejandra
Marcone, Débora Natalia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CRISPR
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
COVID-19
Diagnosis
Fluorescence
Freeze Drying
Repeticiones Palindrómicas Cortas Agrupadas y Regularmente Interespaciadas
Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave 2
Diagnóstico
Fluorescencia
Liofilización
SARS-CoV-2
topic CRISPR
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
COVID-19
Diagnosis
Fluorescence
Freeze Drying
Repeticiones Palindrómicas Cortas Agrupadas y Regularmente Interespaciadas
Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave 2
Diagnóstico
Fluorescencia
Liofilización
SARS-CoV-2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We evaluated a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection (Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit) based on reverse transcription, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR-Cas12 reaction. From a total of 210 RNA samples extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs using spin columns, the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 105/105 (100%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.55–100) positive samples and 104/105 (99.05%; 95% CI: 94.81–99.97) negative samples that were previously tested using commercial RT-qPCR. The estimated overall Kappa index was 0.991, reflecting an almost perfect concordance level between the two diagnostic tests. An initial validation test was also performed on 30 nasopharyngeal samples collected in lysis buffer, in which the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 20/21 (95.24%; 95% CI: 76.18–99.88) positive samples and 9/9 (100%; 95% CI: 66.37–100) negative samples. The estimated Kappa index was 0.923, indicating a strong concordance between the test procedures. The Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was suitable for detecting a wide range of RT-qPCR-positive samples (cycle threshold range: 11.45–36.90) and dilutions of heat-inactivated virus (range: 2.5–100 copies/µL); no cross-reaction was observed with the other respiratory pathogens tested. We demonstrated that the performance of the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was similar to that of commercial RT-qPCR, as the former was highly sensitive and specific, timesaving (1.5 h), inexpensive, and did not require sophisticated equipment. The use of this kit would reduce the time taken for diagnosis and facilitate molecular diagnosis in low-resource laboratories.
Instituto de Virología
Fil: Curti, Lucía Ana. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Primost, Ivana. Hospital Municipal de Trauma y Emergencias Dr. Federico Abete. Genetics and Molecular Biology Laboratory; Argentina
Fil: Valla, Sofia. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CITNOBA). Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas (CIBA); Argentina
Fil: Valla, Sofia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ibañez Alegre, Daiana. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Laboratorio Grupo de Investigación en Genética Aplicada (GIGA); Argentina
Fil: Ibañez Alegre, Daiana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Olguin Perglione, Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina
Fil: Olguin Perglione, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Repizo, Guillermo Daniel. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lara, Julia. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Parcerisa, Ivana. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Palacios, Antonela. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Llases, María Eugenia. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rinflerch, Adriana. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Laboratorio Grupo de Investigación en Genética Aplicada (GIGA); Argentina
Fil: Rinflerch, Adriana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Barrios, Melanie. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Producción Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gimenez, Carla Alejandra. CASPR Biotech; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marcone, Débora Natalia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Departamento de Microbiología, Inmunología, Biotecnología y Genética. Cátedra de Virología; Argentina
Fil: Marcone, Débora Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description We evaluated a lyophilized CRISPR-Cas12 assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection (Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit) based on reverse transcription, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR-Cas12 reaction. From a total of 210 RNA samples extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs using spin columns, the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 105/105 (100%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.55–100) positive samples and 104/105 (99.05%; 95% CI: 94.81–99.97) negative samples that were previously tested using commercial RT-qPCR. The estimated overall Kappa index was 0.991, reflecting an almost perfect concordance level between the two diagnostic tests. An initial validation test was also performed on 30 nasopharyngeal samples collected in lysis buffer, in which the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit detected 20/21 (95.24%; 95% CI: 76.18–99.88) positive samples and 9/9 (100%; 95% CI: 66.37–100) negative samples. The estimated Kappa index was 0.923, indicating a strong concordance between the test procedures. The Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was suitable for detecting a wide range of RT-qPCR-positive samples (cycle threshold range: 11.45–36.90) and dilutions of heat-inactivated virus (range: 2.5–100 copies/µL); no cross-reaction was observed with the other respiratory pathogens tested. We demonstrated that the performance of the Lyo-CRISPR SARS-CoV-2 kit was similar to that of commercial RT-qPCR, as the former was highly sensitive and specific, timesaving (1.5 h), inexpensive, and did not require sophisticated equipment. The use of this kit would reduce the time taken for diagnosis and facilitate molecular diagnosis in low-resource laboratories.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-19T17:40:04Z
2021-04-19T17:40:04Z
2021-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9128
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/3/420
1999-4915
https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030420
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9128
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/3/420
https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030420
identifier_str_mv 1999-4915
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Viruses 13 (3) : 420 (Marzo 2021)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619152749232128
score 12.559606