Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools
- Autores
- Polenta, Gustavo Alberto; Weber, Dorcas; Godefroy Benrejeb, Samuel; Abbott, Michael
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The present study evaluates the effect of food processing on the antigenicity of pecan proteins as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, proteomic tools were used to identify potential pecan markers suitable for confirming the presence of pecan proteins in food and validating new methods developed to detect traces of the commodity. To assess the effects of processing on protein stability and antigenicity, pecan nuts were submitted to heat treatments and extracts were analysed by ELISA, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot. The ELISA method was able to detect pecan traces even after submitting the commodity to rigorous treatments, though these treatments affected the detectability to varying degrees. Proteomic assessment showed that the majority of pecan proteins were matched by homology to walnut proteins, which are more abundantly populated in the protein sequence databases. However, there were a few important exceptions: 7S vicilin, 11S legumin and putative allergen I1, unambiguously identified as pecan in origin. Interestingly, putative allergen I1 offered unique analytical advantages to be used as a pecan marker for validation and confirmation purposes.
Fil: Polenta, Gustavo Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos; Argentina.
Fil: Weber, Dorcas. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada.
Fil: Godefroy Benrejeb, Samuel. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada.
Fil: Abbott, Michael. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada. - Fuente
- Food analytical methods 5 (2) : 216–225. (April 2012)
- Materia
-
Pecan
Alérgenos
Pecana
Allergens
Effect of Processing
Pecan Proteins
Immunological Tools
Proteomic Tools
Food Allergens Detection - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5085
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_dcdb1859984729e42014da2c92c04e72 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5085 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic toolsPolenta, Gustavo AlbertoWeber, DorcasGodefroy Benrejeb, SamuelAbbott, MichaelPecanAlérgenosPecanaAllergensEffect of ProcessingPecan ProteinsImmunological ToolsProteomic ToolsFood Allergens DetectionThe present study evaluates the effect of food processing on the antigenicity of pecan proteins as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, proteomic tools were used to identify potential pecan markers suitable for confirming the presence of pecan proteins in food and validating new methods developed to detect traces of the commodity. To assess the effects of processing on protein stability and antigenicity, pecan nuts were submitted to heat treatments and extracts were analysed by ELISA, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot. The ELISA method was able to detect pecan traces even after submitting the commodity to rigorous treatments, though these treatments affected the detectability to varying degrees. Proteomic assessment showed that the majority of pecan proteins were matched by homology to walnut proteins, which are more abundantly populated in the protein sequence databases. However, there were a few important exceptions: 7S vicilin, 11S legumin and putative allergen I1, unambiguously identified as pecan in origin. Interestingly, putative allergen I1 offered unique analytical advantages to be used as a pecan marker for validation and confirmation purposes.Fil: Polenta, Gustavo Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos; Argentina.Fil: Weber, Dorcas. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada.Fil: Godefroy Benrejeb, Samuel. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada.Fil: Abbott, Michael. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada.Springer2019-05-09T18:22:01Z2019-05-09T18:22:01Z2011-05-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5085https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-011-9255-81936-97511936-976X (Online)https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-011-9255-8Food analytical methods 5 (2) : 216–225. (April 2012)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:39Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/5085instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:40.144INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools |
title |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools |
spellingShingle |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools Polenta, Gustavo Alberto Pecan Alérgenos Pecana Allergens Effect of Processing Pecan Proteins Immunological Tools Proteomic Tools Food Allergens Detection |
title_short |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools |
title_full |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools |
title_fullStr |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools |
title_sort |
Effect of processing on the detectability of pecan proteins assessed by immunological and proteomic tools |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Polenta, Gustavo Alberto Weber, Dorcas Godefroy Benrejeb, Samuel Abbott, Michael |
author |
Polenta, Gustavo Alberto |
author_facet |
Polenta, Gustavo Alberto Weber, Dorcas Godefroy Benrejeb, Samuel Abbott, Michael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Weber, Dorcas Godefroy Benrejeb, Samuel Abbott, Michael |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Pecan Alérgenos Pecana Allergens Effect of Processing Pecan Proteins Immunological Tools Proteomic Tools Food Allergens Detection |
topic |
Pecan Alérgenos Pecana Allergens Effect of Processing Pecan Proteins Immunological Tools Proteomic Tools Food Allergens Detection |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The present study evaluates the effect of food processing on the antigenicity of pecan proteins as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, proteomic tools were used to identify potential pecan markers suitable for confirming the presence of pecan proteins in food and validating new methods developed to detect traces of the commodity. To assess the effects of processing on protein stability and antigenicity, pecan nuts were submitted to heat treatments and extracts were analysed by ELISA, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot. The ELISA method was able to detect pecan traces even after submitting the commodity to rigorous treatments, though these treatments affected the detectability to varying degrees. Proteomic assessment showed that the majority of pecan proteins were matched by homology to walnut proteins, which are more abundantly populated in the protein sequence databases. However, there were a few important exceptions: 7S vicilin, 11S legumin and putative allergen I1, unambiguously identified as pecan in origin. Interestingly, putative allergen I1 offered unique analytical advantages to be used as a pecan marker for validation and confirmation purposes. Fil: Polenta, Gustavo Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos; Argentina. Fil: Weber, Dorcas. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada. Fil: Godefroy Benrejeb, Samuel. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada. Fil: Abbott, Michael. Health Canada. Bureau of Chemical Safety; Canada. |
description |
The present study evaluates the effect of food processing on the antigenicity of pecan proteins as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, proteomic tools were used to identify potential pecan markers suitable for confirming the presence of pecan proteins in food and validating new methods developed to detect traces of the commodity. To assess the effects of processing on protein stability and antigenicity, pecan nuts were submitted to heat treatments and extracts were analysed by ELISA, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot. The ELISA method was able to detect pecan traces even after submitting the commodity to rigorous treatments, though these treatments affected the detectability to varying degrees. Proteomic assessment showed that the majority of pecan proteins were matched by homology to walnut proteins, which are more abundantly populated in the protein sequence databases. However, there were a few important exceptions: 7S vicilin, 11S legumin and putative allergen I1, unambiguously identified as pecan in origin. Interestingly, putative allergen I1 offered unique analytical advantages to be used as a pecan marker for validation and confirmation purposes. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-05-19 2019-05-09T18:22:01Z 2019-05-09T18:22:01Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5085 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-011-9255-8 1936-9751 1936-976X (Online) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-011-9255-8 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5085 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-011-9255-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-011-9255-8 |
identifier_str_mv |
1936-9751 1936-976X (Online) |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food analytical methods 5 (2) : 216–225. (April 2012) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619133763715072 |
score |
12.559606 |