Repeatability of superovulatory response to succesive FSH treatments in Merino sheep

• Autores: Bruno Galarraga, Maria Macarena; Cueto, Marcela Isabel; Gibbons, Alejandro Eduardo; Pereyra Bonnet, Federico; Catalano, Rodolfo; Gonzalez-Bulnes, Antonio
• Año de publicación: 2014
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Fuente: Small ruminant research 120 (1) : 84–89. (July 2014)
• Materia: Producción Animal; Ovinos; Superovulación; Hfs; Animal Production; Sheep; Superovulation; FSH; Raza Merino; Hormona Folículo Estimulante
• Institución: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria

La eficiencia de un programa de la ovulación y la transferencia de embriones múltiples depende de la recuperación de un gran número de embriones viables por oveja donante en cada superovulatorio sucesiva tratamiento. producción de embriones, sin embargo, se caracteriza por una alta variabilidad individual en la respuesta ovárica al tratamiento hormonal. Este estudio evaluó la repetibilidad de ovario respuesta y recuperación del embrión después de tres tratamientos sucesivos superovulatorias en 10 de cuatro años de edad, ovejas Merino en un corto período de tiempo.
The efficiency of a multiple ovulation and embryo transfer program depends on the recovery of a large number of viable embryos per donor ewe at each successive superovulatory treatment. Embryo production, however, is characterized by high individual variability in the ovarian response to hormonal treatment. This study evaluated the repeatability of ovarian response and embryo recovery following three successive superovulatory treatments in 10 four-year-old Merino ewes over a short period of time. Oestrus was synchronized using an intravaginal progesterone pessary inserted on Day 0 and removed on Day 14. FSH was administered to induce superovulation in declining doses twice daily over 3 days as 2(18 + 14 + 8) = 80 mg total commencing on Day 12 after pessary insertion. A dose of 200 IU eCG was administered at pessary removal. Vasectomized rams were used for heat detection and laparoscopic AI was performed 12 h after oestrus detection. Surgical embryo recovery was performed at Day 8 after pessary removal, following which prostaglandin was administered and the next superovulatory procedures began 5 days later giving a 27-day interval between embryo recoveries. Ovulation rates (mean ± SEM) for the three successive superovulatory treatments were 13.8 ± 2.2, 12.1 ± 2.2 and 12.0 ± 2.2 (NS); and total embryos recovered were 8.3 ± 1.4, 6.3 ± 1.4 and 3.9 ± 1.4 (P = 0.06), respectively. Consequently, the embryo recovery rates declined from 66.1 ± 7.5% for the first recovery to 41.4 ± 7.5 and 34.5 ± 7.5% for the second and third recoveries (P = 0.04). The repeatability was r = 0.84 (P < 0.05) for ovulation rate, r = 0.13 (NS) for total number of embryos and r = 0.09 (NS) for number of grade 1 and 2 embryos. The study showed that an average of 16.3 ± 2.6 grades 1 and 2 embryos per donor ewe could be recovered over a period of 2.5 months. The high repeatability of ovarian response to successive superovulatory treatments would have to be associated with a high level of repeatability for the number of transferable embryos recovered for it to be used as a criterion for selecting donors on the basis of their response to the first hormonal treatment.
EEA Bariloche
Fil: Bruno Galarraga, Maria Macarena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Cueto, Marcela Isabel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Gibbons, Alejandro Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Ciencias Básicas y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Catalano, Rodolfo. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina
Fil: Gonzalez-Bulnes, Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria. Subdirección General de Investigación y Tecnología. Departamento Reproducción Animal y Conservación de Recursos Zoogenéticos; España