Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions

Autores
Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel; Bhattarai, Anish; Hand, Lavesta C.; Snider, John L.; Roberts, Phillip M.; Bastos, Leonardo M.
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment.
EEA Reconquista
Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; Argentina
Fil: Bhattarai, Anish. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hand, Lavesta C. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Snider, John L. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Roberts, Phillip M. University of Georgia. Department of Entomology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bastos, Leonardo M. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Field Crops Research 325 : 109822. (April 2025)
Materia
Algodón
Rendimiento
Calidad
Interacción Genotipo Ambiente
Georgia (EUA)
Cotton
Yields
Quality
Genotype-environment Interaction
Gossypium hirsutum
Georgia (USA)
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21592

id INTADig_bb2c6ea3ca1eec0bb88b92737db09ed1
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21592
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactionsScarpin, Gonzalo JoelBhattarai, AnishHand, Lavesta C.Snider, John L.Roberts, Phillip M.Bastos, Leonardo M.AlgodónRendimientoCalidadInteracción Genotipo AmbienteGeorgia (EUA)CottonYieldsQualityGenotype-environment InteractionGossypium hirsutumGeorgia (USA)Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment.EEA ReconquistaFil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Bhattarai, Anish. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Hand, Lavesta C. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Snider, John L. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Roberts, Phillip M. University of Georgia. Department of Entomology; Estados UnidosFil: Bastos, Leonardo M. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosElsevier2025-03-07T12:15:20Z2025-03-07T12:15:20Z2025-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21592https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03784290250008750378-42901872-6852https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109822Field Crops Research 325 : 109822. (April 2025)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología AgropecuariaengGeorgia .......... (state) (World, North and Central America, United States)7007248info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:47:10Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/21592instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:47:11.385INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
title Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
spellingShingle Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel
Algodón
Rendimiento
Calidad
Interacción Genotipo Ambiente
Georgia (EUA)
Cotton
Yields
Quality
Genotype-environment Interaction
Gossypium hirsutum
Georgia (USA)
title_short Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
title_full Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
title_fullStr Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
title_full_unstemmed Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
title_sort Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel
Bhattarai, Anish
Hand, Lavesta C.
Snider, John L.
Roberts, Phillip M.
Bastos, Leonardo M.
author Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel
author_facet Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel
Bhattarai, Anish
Hand, Lavesta C.
Snider, John L.
Roberts, Phillip M.
Bastos, Leonardo M.
author_role author
author2 Bhattarai, Anish
Hand, Lavesta C.
Snider, John L.
Roberts, Phillip M.
Bastos, Leonardo M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Algodón
Rendimiento
Calidad
Interacción Genotipo Ambiente
Georgia (EUA)
Cotton
Yields
Quality
Genotype-environment Interaction
Gossypium hirsutum
Georgia (USA)
topic Algodón
Rendimiento
Calidad
Interacción Genotipo Ambiente
Georgia (EUA)
Cotton
Yields
Quality
Genotype-environment Interaction
Gossypium hirsutum
Georgia (USA)
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment.
EEA Reconquista
Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; Argentina
Fil: Bhattarai, Anish. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hand, Lavesta C. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Snider, John L. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Roberts, Phillip M. University of Georgia. Department of Entomology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bastos, Leonardo M. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
description Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-03-07T12:15:20Z
2025-03-07T12:15:20Z
2025-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21592
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000875
0378-4290
1872-6852
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109822
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21592
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000875
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109822
identifier_str_mv 0378-4290
1872-6852
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Georgia .......... (state) (World, North and Central America, United States)
7007248
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Field Crops Research 325 : 109822. (April 2025)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619201533181952
score 12.559606