Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions
- Autores
- Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel; Bhattarai, Anish; Hand, Lavesta C.; Snider, John L.; Roberts, Phillip M.; Bastos, Leonardo M.
- Año de publicación
- 2025
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment.
EEA Reconquista
Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; Argentina
Fil: Bhattarai, Anish. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hand, Lavesta C. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Snider, John L. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Roberts, Phillip M. University of Georgia. Department of Entomology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bastos, Leonardo M. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos - Fuente
- Field Crops Research 325 : 109822. (April 2025)
- Materia
-
Algodón
Rendimiento
Calidad
Interacción Genotipo Ambiente
Georgia (EUA)
Cotton
Yields
Quality
Genotype-environment Interaction
Gossypium hirsutum
Georgia (USA) - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21592
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_bb2c6ea3ca1eec0bb88b92737db09ed1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21592 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactionsScarpin, Gonzalo JoelBhattarai, AnishHand, Lavesta C.Snider, John L.Roberts, Phillip M.Bastos, Leonardo M.AlgodónRendimientoCalidadInteracción Genotipo AmbienteGeorgia (EUA)CottonYieldsQualityGenotype-environment InteractionGossypium hirsutumGeorgia (USA)Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment.EEA ReconquistaFil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Bhattarai, Anish. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Hand, Lavesta C. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Snider, John L. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Roberts, Phillip M. University of Georgia. Department of Entomology; Estados UnidosFil: Bastos, Leonardo M. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosElsevier2025-03-07T12:15:20Z2025-03-07T12:15:20Z2025-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21592https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03784290250008750378-42901872-6852https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109822Field Crops Research 325 : 109822. (April 2025)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología AgropecuariaengGeorgia .......... (state) (World, North and Central America, United States)7007248info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:47:10Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/21592instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:47:11.385INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions |
title |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions |
spellingShingle |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel Algodón Rendimiento Calidad Interacción Genotipo Ambiente Georgia (EUA) Cotton Yields Quality Genotype-environment Interaction Gossypium hirsutum Georgia (USA) |
title_short |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions |
title_full |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions |
title_fullStr |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions |
title_sort |
Cotton lint yield and quality variability in Georgia, USA: Understanding genotypic and environmental interactions |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel Bhattarai, Anish Hand, Lavesta C. Snider, John L. Roberts, Phillip M. Bastos, Leonardo M. |
author |
Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel |
author_facet |
Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel Bhattarai, Anish Hand, Lavesta C. Snider, John L. Roberts, Phillip M. Bastos, Leonardo M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bhattarai, Anish Hand, Lavesta C. Snider, John L. Roberts, Phillip M. Bastos, Leonardo M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Algodón Rendimiento Calidad Interacción Genotipo Ambiente Georgia (EUA) Cotton Yields Quality Genotype-environment Interaction Gossypium hirsutum Georgia (USA) |
topic |
Algodón Rendimiento Calidad Interacción Genotipo Ambiente Georgia (EUA) Cotton Yields Quality Genotype-environment Interaction Gossypium hirsutum Georgia (USA) |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment. EEA Reconquista Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; Argentina Fil: Bhattarai, Anish. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Hand, Lavesta C. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Snider, John L. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Roberts, Phillip M. University of Georgia. Department of Entomology; Estados Unidos Fil: Bastos, Leonardo M. University of Georgia. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos |
description |
Context: Georgia is one of the largest cotton producer in the United States. Genotype x environment analysis have been previously performed, although there still exists a gap in knowledge related to i) newer varieties and ii) characterization of environmental potential in relation to meteorological patterns during the growing season. Objectives: i) to quantify the effects of environment, genotype, and management on yield and quality; ii) to evaluate the performance and responsiveness of different genotypes to different environments, and iii) to identify environmental conditions with increased cotton lint yield or quality parameters. Method: Studies were conducted in 73 site-years as part of a variety trial program. In all the site-years, 22 cotton varieties were evaluated, of which twelve were present in at least 45 site-years. We performed analysis of variance, variance component, Finlay-Wilkinson, and conditional inference tree, to achieve our objectives. Results: The environment had a greater impact on yield and fiber quality (length, strength, uniformity and micronaire) than did genotype. We generate recommendations on variety selection according to each environment index. Conditional inference tree identified temperature and stage duration in squaring and boll opening as the most important variables and stages for affecting micronaire, yellowness, length, and uniformity. Conclusions: Our results will help farmers selecting the proper variety, considering not only their potential but also their main goal (yield or quality). As newer cotton genotypes are introduced yearly, we propose to continue working with these datasets to develop an online application to help farmers to identify and select the best genotype for their environment. |
publishDate |
2025 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-03-07T12:15:20Z 2025-03-07T12:15:20Z 2025-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21592 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000875 0378-4290 1872-6852 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109822 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21592 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000875 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109822 |
identifier_str_mv |
0378-4290 1872-6852 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Georgia .......... (state) (World, North and Central America, United States) 7007248 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Field Crops Research 325 : 109822. (April 2025) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619201533181952 |
score |
12.559606 |