Genomic selection in forest trees comes to life: unraveling its potential in an advanced four - generation Eucalyptus grandis population

• Autores: Duarte, Damían; Jurcic, Esteban Javier; Dutour, Joaquín; Villalba, Pamela Victoria; Centurion, Carmelo; Grattapaglia, Darío; Cappa, Eduardo Pablo
• Año de publicación: 2024
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Fuente: Frontiers in Plant Science 15 : 1462285 (October 2024)
• Materia: Seedling Stage; Marker-assisted Selection; Forest Trees; Estadío de Plántula; Eucalyptus; Eucalyptus grandis; Selección Asistida por Marcadores; Arboles Forestales; Genomic Selection Effectiveness; Genomic Selection; Eficacia de la Selección Genómica
• Institución: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria

Genomic Selection (GS) in tree breeding optimizes genetic gains by leveraging genomic data to enable early selection of seedlings without phenotypic data reducing breeding cycle and increasing selection intensity. Traditional assessments of the potential of GS in forest trees have typically focused on model performance using cross-validation within the same generation but evaluating effectively realized predictive ability (RPA) across generations is crucial. This study estimated RPAs for volume growth (VOL), wood density (WD), and pulp yield (PY) across four generations breeding of Eucalyptus grandis. The training set spanned three generations, including 34,461 trees with three-year growth data, 6,014 trees with wood quality trait data, and 1,918 trees with 12,695 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) data. Employing single-step genomic BLUP, we compared the genomic predictions of breeding values (GEBVs) for 1,153 fourth-generation full-sib seedlings in the greenhouse with their later-collected phenotypic estimated breeding values (EBVs) at age three years. RPAs were estimated using three GS targets (individual trees, trees within families, and families), two selection criteria (single- and multiple-trait), and training populations of either all 1,918 genotyped trees or the 67 direct ancestors of the selection candidates. RPAs were higher for wood quality traits (0.33 to 0.59) compared to VOL (0.14 to 0.19) and improved for wood traits (0.42 to 0.75) but not for VOL when trained only with direct ancestors, highlighting the challenges in accurately predicting growth traits. GS was more effective at excluding bottom-ranked candidates than selecting top-ranked ones. The between-family GS approach outperformed individual-tree selection for VOL (0.11 to 0.16) and PY (0.72 to 0.75), but not for WD (0.43 vs. 0.42). Furthermore, higher levels of relatedness and lower genotype by environment (G × E) interaction between training and testing populations enhanced RPAs for VOL (0.39). In summary, despite limited effectiveness in ranking top VOL individuals, GS effectively identified low-performing individuals and families. These multi- generational findings underscore GS’s potential in tree breeding, stressing the importance of considering relatedness and G × E interaction for optimal performance.
Instituto de Recursos Biológicos
Fil: Duarte, Damián. Forestal Oriental. UPM, Paysandú; Uruguay
Fil: Jurcic, Esteban J. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Dutour, Joaquín. Forestal Oriental. UPM, Paysandú; Uruguay
Fil: Villalba, Pamela Victoria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Centurion, Carmelo. Forestal Oriental. UPM, Paysandú; Uruguay
Fil: Grattapaglia, Darío. EMBRAPA Genetic Resources and Biotechnology. Plant Genetic Laboratory; Brasil
Fil: Cappa, Eduardo Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina