Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way
- Autores
- Varela, Anabella; Ibañez, Verónica Noé; Alonso, Rodrigo; Zavallo, Diego; Asurmendi, Sebastian; Gomez Talquenca, Gonzalo Sebastián; Marfil, Carlos Federico; Berli, Federico Javier
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Clonal selection and vegetative propagation determine low genetic variability in grapevine cultivars, although it is common to observe diverse phenotypes. Environmental signals may induce epigenetic changes altering gene expression and phenotype. The range of phenotypes that a genotype expresses in different environments is known as phenotypic plasticity. DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mechanism, but only few works evaluated this novel source of variability in grapevines. In the present study, we analyzed the effects on phenotypic traits and epigenome of three Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec clones cultivated in two contrasting vineyards of Mendoza, Argentina. Anonymous genome regions were analyzed using methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) markers. Clone-dependent phenotypic and epigenetic variability between vineyards were found. The clone that presented the clearer MSAP differentiation between vineyards was selected and analyzed through reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Twenty-nine differentially methylated regions between vineyards were identified and associated to genes and/or promoters. We discuss about a group of genes related to hormones homeostasis and sensing that could provide a hint of the epigenetic role in the determination of the different phenotypes observed between vineyards and conclude that DNA methylation has an important role in the phenotypic plasticity and that epigenetic modulation is clone-dependent.
Instituto de Biotecnología
Fil: Varela, Anabella. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Varela, Anabella. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ibañez, Verónica N. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Ibañez, Verónica N. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Alonso, Rodrigo. Bodega Catena Zapata; Argentina
Fil: Zavallo, Diego. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina
Fil: Zavallo, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Asurmendi, Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina
Fil: Asurmendi, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gomez Talquenca, Gonzalo Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Marfil, Carlos Federico. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Marfil, Carlos Federico. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Berli, Federico Javier. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Berli, Federico Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Fuente
- Plant Cell Reports 40 (1) : 111-125 (Enero 2021)
- Materia
-
Epigenetics
Methylation
Phenotypic Plasticity
Vineyards
Epigenético
Metilación
Plasticidad Fenotípica
Vitis vinifera
Viña
Malbec - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/9082
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_9f6fbb032be245e12a73dfd3d9d7c600 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/9082 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent wayVarela, AnabellaIbañez, Verónica NoéAlonso, RodrigoZavallo, DiegoAsurmendi, SebastianGomez Talquenca, Gonzalo SebastiánMarfil, Carlos FedericoBerli, Federico JavierEpigeneticsMethylationPhenotypic PlasticityVineyardsEpigenéticoMetilaciónPlasticidad FenotípicaVitis viniferaViñaMalbecClonal selection and vegetative propagation determine low genetic variability in grapevine cultivars, although it is common to observe diverse phenotypes. Environmental signals may induce epigenetic changes altering gene expression and phenotype. The range of phenotypes that a genotype expresses in different environments is known as phenotypic plasticity. DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mechanism, but only few works evaluated this novel source of variability in grapevines. In the present study, we analyzed the effects on phenotypic traits and epigenome of three Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec clones cultivated in two contrasting vineyards of Mendoza, Argentina. Anonymous genome regions were analyzed using methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) markers. Clone-dependent phenotypic and epigenetic variability between vineyards were found. The clone that presented the clearer MSAP differentiation between vineyards was selected and analyzed through reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Twenty-nine differentially methylated regions between vineyards were identified and associated to genes and/or promoters. We discuss about a group of genes related to hormones homeostasis and sensing that could provide a hint of the epigenetic role in the determination of the different phenotypes observed between vineyards and conclude that DNA methylation has an important role in the phenotypic plasticity and that epigenetic modulation is clone-dependent.Instituto de BiotecnologíaFil: Varela, Anabella. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Varela, Anabella. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Ibañez, Verónica N. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Ibañez, Verónica N. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Alonso, Rodrigo. Bodega Catena Zapata; ArgentinaFil: Zavallo, Diego. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; ArgentinaFil: Zavallo, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Asurmendi, Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; ArgentinaFil: Asurmendi, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gomez Talquenca, Gonzalo Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Marfil, Carlos Federico. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Marfil, Carlos Federico. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Berli, Federico Javier. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Berli, Federico Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaSpringer Verlag2021-04-14T11:01:39Z2021-04-14T11:01:39Z2021-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9082https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00299-020-02617-w1432-203Xhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02617-wPlant Cell Reports 40 (1) : 111-125 (Enero 2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:45:10Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/9082instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:11.215INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way |
title |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way |
spellingShingle |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way Varela, Anabella Epigenetics Methylation Phenotypic Plasticity Vineyards Epigenético Metilación Plasticidad Fenotípica Vitis vinifera Viña Malbec |
title_short |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way |
title_full |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way |
title_fullStr |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way |
title_sort |
Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone‑dependent way |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Varela, Anabella Ibañez, Verónica Noé Alonso, Rodrigo Zavallo, Diego Asurmendi, Sebastian Gomez Talquenca, Gonzalo Sebastián Marfil, Carlos Federico Berli, Federico Javier |
author |
Varela, Anabella |
author_facet |
Varela, Anabella Ibañez, Verónica Noé Alonso, Rodrigo Zavallo, Diego Asurmendi, Sebastian Gomez Talquenca, Gonzalo Sebastián Marfil, Carlos Federico Berli, Federico Javier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ibañez, Verónica Noé Alonso, Rodrigo Zavallo, Diego Asurmendi, Sebastian Gomez Talquenca, Gonzalo Sebastián Marfil, Carlos Federico Berli, Federico Javier |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Epigenetics Methylation Phenotypic Plasticity Vineyards Epigenético Metilación Plasticidad Fenotípica Vitis vinifera Viña Malbec |
topic |
Epigenetics Methylation Phenotypic Plasticity Vineyards Epigenético Metilación Plasticidad Fenotípica Vitis vinifera Viña Malbec |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Clonal selection and vegetative propagation determine low genetic variability in grapevine cultivars, although it is common to observe diverse phenotypes. Environmental signals may induce epigenetic changes altering gene expression and phenotype. The range of phenotypes that a genotype expresses in different environments is known as phenotypic plasticity. DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mechanism, but only few works evaluated this novel source of variability in grapevines. In the present study, we analyzed the effects on phenotypic traits and epigenome of three Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec clones cultivated in two contrasting vineyards of Mendoza, Argentina. Anonymous genome regions were analyzed using methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) markers. Clone-dependent phenotypic and epigenetic variability between vineyards were found. The clone that presented the clearer MSAP differentiation between vineyards was selected and analyzed through reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Twenty-nine differentially methylated regions between vineyards were identified and associated to genes and/or promoters. We discuss about a group of genes related to hormones homeostasis and sensing that could provide a hint of the epigenetic role in the determination of the different phenotypes observed between vineyards and conclude that DNA methylation has an important role in the phenotypic plasticity and that epigenetic modulation is clone-dependent. Instituto de Biotecnología Fil: Varela, Anabella. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Varela, Anabella. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Ibañez, Verónica N. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Ibañez, Verónica N. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Alonso, Rodrigo. Bodega Catena Zapata; Argentina Fil: Zavallo, Diego. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Zavallo, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Asurmendi, Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Asurmendi, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Gomez Talquenca, Gonzalo Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Marfil, Carlos Federico. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Marfil, Carlos Federico. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Berli, Federico Javier. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Berli, Federico Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Clonal selection and vegetative propagation determine low genetic variability in grapevine cultivars, although it is common to observe diverse phenotypes. Environmental signals may induce epigenetic changes altering gene expression and phenotype. The range of phenotypes that a genotype expresses in different environments is known as phenotypic plasticity. DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mechanism, but only few works evaluated this novel source of variability in grapevines. In the present study, we analyzed the effects on phenotypic traits and epigenome of three Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec clones cultivated in two contrasting vineyards of Mendoza, Argentina. Anonymous genome regions were analyzed using methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) markers. Clone-dependent phenotypic and epigenetic variability between vineyards were found. The clone that presented the clearer MSAP differentiation between vineyards was selected and analyzed through reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Twenty-nine differentially methylated regions between vineyards were identified and associated to genes and/or promoters. We discuss about a group of genes related to hormones homeostasis and sensing that could provide a hint of the epigenetic role in the determination of the different phenotypes observed between vineyards and conclude that DNA methylation has an important role in the phenotypic plasticity and that epigenetic modulation is clone-dependent. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-14T11:01:39Z 2021-04-14T11:01:39Z 2021-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9082 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00299-020-02617-w 1432-203X https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02617-w |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9082 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00299-020-02617-w https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02617-w |
identifier_str_mv |
1432-203X |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Plant Cell Reports 40 (1) : 111-125 (Enero 2021) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619152645423104 |
score |
12.559606 |