Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants

Autores
Cara, Nicolás; Marfil, Carlos Federico; Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia; Masuelli, Ricardo Williams
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Since their development, AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers have been used for a wide variety of analyses and, up to this day, are considered highly informative, robust, and reproducible molecular markers. Originally, the visualization of the amplified fragments was done in polyacrylamide gels, followed by silver staining or by developing in an X-ray plate, when radioactivity is used. In the last 14 years, capillary electrophoresis of fluorescently labeled fragments has been gradually replacing gel-based systems. However, the latter continue to be better for isolating and cloning AFLP fragments. In this report, we compare the results obtained by capillary electrophoresis with those from silver staining. We found that if fluorescence-labeled amplification products are loaded in a polyacrylamide gel, duplicated bands (doublets) are seen. This phenomenon is probably due to a delay in the migration of the strand that carries the fluorophore. Therefore, we recommend a minimum separation of 4 bp from the nearest fragment to the target fragment for its unambiguous identification and isolation. If this requirement is not fulfilled, an alternative is to make new amplifications using the same primer combination, but with unlabeled primers.
EEA La Consulta
Fil: Cara, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Marfil, Carlos Fedrico. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina
Fil: Masuelli, Ricardo Williams. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina
Fuente
Botany 92 (8) : 607-610 (2014)
Materia
Marcadores Genéticos
Polimorfismo de Longitud de Fragmentos Amplificados
Plantas
Electrofóresis Gel Poliacrilamida
Genetic Markers
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism
Plants
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
AFLP
Marcadores Moleculares
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2664

id INTADig_8ff671d6dd8345677a0c950b71217fba
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2664
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plantsCara, NicolásMarfil, Carlos FedericoGarcia Lampasona, Sandra ClaudiaMasuelli, Ricardo WilliamsMarcadores GenéticosPolimorfismo de Longitud de Fragmentos AmplificadosPlantasElectrofóresis Gel PoliacrilamidaGenetic MarkersAmplified Fragment Length PolymorphismPlantsPolyacrylamide Gel ElectrophoresisAFLPMarcadores MolecularesSince their development, AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers have been used for a wide variety of analyses and, up to this day, are considered highly informative, robust, and reproducible molecular markers. Originally, the visualization of the amplified fragments was done in polyacrylamide gels, followed by silver staining or by developing in an X-ray plate, when radioactivity is used. In the last 14 years, capillary electrophoresis of fluorescently labeled fragments has been gradually replacing gel-based systems. However, the latter continue to be better for isolating and cloning AFLP fragments. In this report, we compare the results obtained by capillary electrophoresis with those from silver staining. We found that if fluorescence-labeled amplification products are loaded in a polyacrylamide gel, duplicated bands (doublets) are seen. This phenomenon is probably due to a delay in the migration of the strand that carries the fluorophore. Therefore, we recommend a minimum separation of 4 bp from the nearest fragment to the target fragment for its unambiguous identification and isolation. If this requirement is not fulfilled, an alternative is to make new amplifications using the same primer combination, but with unlabeled primers.EEA La ConsultaFil: Cara, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Marfil, Carlos Fedrico. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; ArgentinaFil: Masuelli, Ricardo Williams. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina2018-06-21T12:33:45Z2018-06-21T12:33:45Z2014-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2664http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/cjb-2014-0047#.WyuX_jdKjcs1916-27901916-2804https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0047Botany 92 (8) : 607-610 (2014)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:21Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2664instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:21.316INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
title Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
spellingShingle Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
Cara, Nicolás
Marcadores Genéticos
Polimorfismo de Longitud de Fragmentos Amplificados
Plantas
Electrofóresis Gel Poliacrilamida
Genetic Markers
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism
Plants
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
AFLP
Marcadores Moleculares
title_short Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
title_full Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
title_fullStr Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
title_sort Comparison of two detection systems to reveal AFLP markers in plants
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cara, Nicolás
Marfil, Carlos Federico
Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia
Masuelli, Ricardo Williams
author Cara, Nicolás
author_facet Cara, Nicolás
Marfil, Carlos Federico
Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia
Masuelli, Ricardo Williams
author_role author
author2 Marfil, Carlos Federico
Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia
Masuelli, Ricardo Williams
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Marcadores Genéticos
Polimorfismo de Longitud de Fragmentos Amplificados
Plantas
Electrofóresis Gel Poliacrilamida
Genetic Markers
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism
Plants
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
AFLP
Marcadores Moleculares
topic Marcadores Genéticos
Polimorfismo de Longitud de Fragmentos Amplificados
Plantas
Electrofóresis Gel Poliacrilamida
Genetic Markers
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism
Plants
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
AFLP
Marcadores Moleculares
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Since their development, AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers have been used for a wide variety of analyses and, up to this day, are considered highly informative, robust, and reproducible molecular markers. Originally, the visualization of the amplified fragments was done in polyacrylamide gels, followed by silver staining or by developing in an X-ray plate, when radioactivity is used. In the last 14 years, capillary electrophoresis of fluorescently labeled fragments has been gradually replacing gel-based systems. However, the latter continue to be better for isolating and cloning AFLP fragments. In this report, we compare the results obtained by capillary electrophoresis with those from silver staining. We found that if fluorescence-labeled amplification products are loaded in a polyacrylamide gel, duplicated bands (doublets) are seen. This phenomenon is probably due to a delay in the migration of the strand that carries the fluorophore. Therefore, we recommend a minimum separation of 4 bp from the nearest fragment to the target fragment for its unambiguous identification and isolation. If this requirement is not fulfilled, an alternative is to make new amplifications using the same primer combination, but with unlabeled primers.
EEA La Consulta
Fil: Cara, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Marfil, Carlos Fedrico. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina
Fil: Masuelli, Ricardo Williams. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina
description Since their development, AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers have been used for a wide variety of analyses and, up to this day, are considered highly informative, robust, and reproducible molecular markers. Originally, the visualization of the amplified fragments was done in polyacrylamide gels, followed by silver staining or by developing in an X-ray plate, when radioactivity is used. In the last 14 years, capillary electrophoresis of fluorescently labeled fragments has been gradually replacing gel-based systems. However, the latter continue to be better for isolating and cloning AFLP fragments. In this report, we compare the results obtained by capillary electrophoresis with those from silver staining. We found that if fluorescence-labeled amplification products are loaded in a polyacrylamide gel, duplicated bands (doublets) are seen. This phenomenon is probably due to a delay in the migration of the strand that carries the fluorophore. Therefore, we recommend a minimum separation of 4 bp from the nearest fragment to the target fragment for its unambiguous identification and isolation. If this requirement is not fulfilled, an alternative is to make new amplifications using the same primer combination, but with unlabeled primers.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06
2018-06-21T12:33:45Z
2018-06-21T12:33:45Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2664
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/cjb-2014-0047#.WyuX_jdKjcs
1916-2790
1916-2804
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0047
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2664
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/cjb-2014-0047#.WyuX_jdKjcs
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0047
identifier_str_mv 1916-2790
1916-2804
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Botany 92 (8) : 607-610 (2014)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619123376521216
score 12.559606