Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures

Autores
Mujica, María Valentina; Preti, Michele; Basoalto, Esteban; Cichon, Liliana; Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo; Barros-Parada, Wilson; Krawczyk, Greg; Nunes, Marcelo Z.; Walgenbach, Jim F.; Hansen, Randy; Knight, Alan L.
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Male and female moth catches of Grapholita molesta (Busck) in traps were evaluated in stone and pome fruit orchards untreated or treated with sex pheromones for mating disruption in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, USA, and Italy from 2015 to 2017. Trials evaluated various blends loaded into either membrane cup lures or septa. Membrane lures were loaded with terpinyl acetate (TA), acetic acid (AA) and (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate alone or in combinations. Two septa lures were loaded with either the three‐component sex pheromone blend for G. molesta alone or in combination with codlemone (2‐PH), the sex pheromone of Cydia pomonella (L). A third septum lure included the combination sex pheromone blend plus pear ester, (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (2‐PH/PE), and a fourth septum was loaded with only β‐ocimene. Results were consistent across geographical areas showing that the addition of β‐ocimene or (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate did not increase moth catches. The addition of pear ester to the sex pheromone lure marginally increased moth catches. The use of TA and AA together significantly increased moth catches compared with the use of only one of the two components. Traps with the TA/AA lure outperformed the Ajar trap baited with a liquid TA plus sugar bait. The emission rate of AA was not a significant factor affecting the performance of the TA/AA lure. The addition of TA/AA significantly increased moth catches when combined with the 2‐PH lure. The TA/AA lure also allowed traps to catch both sexes. Catch of C. pomonella with the 2‐PH lure was comparable to the use of codlemone; however, moth catch was significantly reduced with the 2‐PH/PE lure. Optimization of these complex lures can likely further improve managers’ ability to monitor G. molesta and help to develop multispecies tortricid lures for use in individual traps.
EEA Alto Valle
Fil: Mujica, María Valentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Protección Vegetal; Uruguay
Fil: Basoalto, Esteban. Universidad Austral de Chile (UACh). Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal; Chile
Fil: Preti, Michele. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ).· Faculty of Science and Technology; Italia
Fil: Cichón, Liliana Isabel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo. Universidad de Talca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Chile
Fil: Barros-Parada, Wilson. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (PUCV). Escuela de Agronomía; Chile
Fil: Krawczyk, Greg. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Nunes, Marcelo Z. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology. Fruit Research and Extension Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Walgenbach, Jim F. North Carolina State University. Mountain Horticultural Crops Research & Extension Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hansen, Randy. Hansen Associates; Estados Unidos
Knight, Alan L. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Journal of applied entomology 142 (8) : 731-744 .(September 2018)
Materia
Grapholita Molesta
Cydia Pomonella
Lepidoptera
Tortricidae
Manzana
Prunus Persica
Frutas de Pepita
Apples
Pome Fruits
Acido Acético
Peach
Mating Disruption
Monitoring
Oriental Fruit Moth
Terpinyl Acetate
Melocoton
Interrupción del Apareamiento
Monitoreo
Polilla de la Fruta Oriental
Acetato de Terpinilo
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/4434

id INTADig_87baba1dbf18b52af568b4283b775065
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/4434
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane luresMujica, María ValentinaPreti, MicheleBasoalto, EstebanCichon, LilianaFuentes-Contreras, EduardoBarros-Parada, WilsonKrawczyk, GregNunes, Marcelo Z.Walgenbach, Jim F.Hansen, RandyKnight, Alan L.Grapholita MolestaCydia PomonellaLepidopteraTortricidaeManzanaPrunus PersicaFrutas de PepitaApplesPome FruitsAcido AcéticoPeachMating DisruptionMonitoringOriental Fruit MothTerpinyl AcetateMelocotonInterrupción del ApareamientoMonitoreoPolilla de la Fruta OrientalAcetato de TerpiniloMale and female moth catches of Grapholita molesta (Busck) in traps were evaluated in stone and pome fruit orchards untreated or treated with sex pheromones for mating disruption in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, USA, and Italy from 2015 to 2017. Trials evaluated various blends loaded into either membrane cup lures or septa. Membrane lures were loaded with terpinyl acetate (TA), acetic acid (AA) and (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate alone or in combinations. Two septa lures were loaded with either the three‐component sex pheromone blend for G. molesta alone or in combination with codlemone (2‐PH), the sex pheromone of Cydia pomonella (L). A third septum lure included the combination sex pheromone blend plus pear ester, (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (2‐PH/PE), and a fourth septum was loaded with only β‐ocimene. Results were consistent across geographical areas showing that the addition of β‐ocimene or (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate did not increase moth catches. The addition of pear ester to the sex pheromone lure marginally increased moth catches. The use of TA and AA together significantly increased moth catches compared with the use of only one of the two components. Traps with the TA/AA lure outperformed the Ajar trap baited with a liquid TA plus sugar bait. The emission rate of AA was not a significant factor affecting the performance of the TA/AA lure. The addition of TA/AA significantly increased moth catches when combined with the 2‐PH lure. The TA/AA lure also allowed traps to catch both sexes. Catch of C. pomonella with the 2‐PH lure was comparable to the use of codlemone; however, moth catch was significantly reduced with the 2‐PH/PE lure. Optimization of these complex lures can likely further improve managers’ ability to monitor G. molesta and help to develop multispecies tortricid lures for use in individual traps.EEA Alto ValleFil: Mujica, María Valentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Protección Vegetal; UruguayFil: Basoalto, Esteban. Universidad Austral de Chile (UACh). Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal; ChileFil: Preti, Michele. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ).· Faculty of Science and Technology; ItaliaFil: Cichón, Liliana Isabel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; ArgentinaFil: Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo. Universidad de Talca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ChileFil: Barros-Parada, Wilson. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (PUCV). Escuela de Agronomía; ChileFil: Krawczyk, Greg. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology; Estados UnidosFil: Nunes, Marcelo Z. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology. Fruit Research and Extension Center; Estados UnidosFil: Walgenbach, Jim F. North Carolina State University. Mountain Horticultural Crops Research & Extension Center; Estados UnidosFil: Hansen, Randy. Hansen Associates; Estados UnidosKnight, Alan L. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidos2019-02-12T18:22:38Z2019-02-12T18:22:38Z2018-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/44341439-04180931-2048https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-018-0111-2Journal of applied entomology 142 (8) : 731-744 .(September 2018)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:47:48Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/4434instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:48.914INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
title Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
spellingShingle Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
Mujica, María Valentina
Grapholita Molesta
Cydia Pomonella
Lepidoptera
Tortricidae
Manzana
Prunus Persica
Frutas de Pepita
Apples
Pome Fruits
Acido Acético
Peach
Mating Disruption
Monitoring
Oriental Fruit Moth
Terpinyl Acetate
Melocoton
Interrupción del Apareamiento
Monitoreo
Polilla de la Fruta Oriental
Acetato de Terpinilo
title_short Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
title_full Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
title_fullStr Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
title_full_unstemmed Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
title_sort Improved monitoring of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with terpinyl acetate plus acetic acid membrane lures
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mujica, María Valentina
Preti, Michele
Basoalto, Esteban
Cichon, Liliana
Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo
Barros-Parada, Wilson
Krawczyk, Greg
Nunes, Marcelo Z.
Walgenbach, Jim F.
Hansen, Randy
Knight, Alan L.
author Mujica, María Valentina
author_facet Mujica, María Valentina
Preti, Michele
Basoalto, Esteban
Cichon, Liliana
Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo
Barros-Parada, Wilson
Krawczyk, Greg
Nunes, Marcelo Z.
Walgenbach, Jim F.
Hansen, Randy
Knight, Alan L.
author_role author
author2 Preti, Michele
Basoalto, Esteban
Cichon, Liliana
Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo
Barros-Parada, Wilson
Krawczyk, Greg
Nunes, Marcelo Z.
Walgenbach, Jim F.
Hansen, Randy
Knight, Alan L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Grapholita Molesta
Cydia Pomonella
Lepidoptera
Tortricidae
Manzana
Prunus Persica
Frutas de Pepita
Apples
Pome Fruits
Acido Acético
Peach
Mating Disruption
Monitoring
Oriental Fruit Moth
Terpinyl Acetate
Melocoton
Interrupción del Apareamiento
Monitoreo
Polilla de la Fruta Oriental
Acetato de Terpinilo
topic Grapholita Molesta
Cydia Pomonella
Lepidoptera
Tortricidae
Manzana
Prunus Persica
Frutas de Pepita
Apples
Pome Fruits
Acido Acético
Peach
Mating Disruption
Monitoring
Oriental Fruit Moth
Terpinyl Acetate
Melocoton
Interrupción del Apareamiento
Monitoreo
Polilla de la Fruta Oriental
Acetato de Terpinilo
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Male and female moth catches of Grapholita molesta (Busck) in traps were evaluated in stone and pome fruit orchards untreated or treated with sex pheromones for mating disruption in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, USA, and Italy from 2015 to 2017. Trials evaluated various blends loaded into either membrane cup lures or septa. Membrane lures were loaded with terpinyl acetate (TA), acetic acid (AA) and (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate alone or in combinations. Two septa lures were loaded with either the three‐component sex pheromone blend for G. molesta alone or in combination with codlemone (2‐PH), the sex pheromone of Cydia pomonella (L). A third septum lure included the combination sex pheromone blend plus pear ester, (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (2‐PH/PE), and a fourth septum was loaded with only β‐ocimene. Results were consistent across geographical areas showing that the addition of β‐ocimene or (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate did not increase moth catches. The addition of pear ester to the sex pheromone lure marginally increased moth catches. The use of TA and AA together significantly increased moth catches compared with the use of only one of the two components. Traps with the TA/AA lure outperformed the Ajar trap baited with a liquid TA plus sugar bait. The emission rate of AA was not a significant factor affecting the performance of the TA/AA lure. The addition of TA/AA significantly increased moth catches when combined with the 2‐PH lure. The TA/AA lure also allowed traps to catch both sexes. Catch of C. pomonella with the 2‐PH lure was comparable to the use of codlemone; however, moth catch was significantly reduced with the 2‐PH/PE lure. Optimization of these complex lures can likely further improve managers’ ability to monitor G. molesta and help to develop multispecies tortricid lures for use in individual traps.
EEA Alto Valle
Fil: Mujica, María Valentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Protección Vegetal; Uruguay
Fil: Basoalto, Esteban. Universidad Austral de Chile (UACh). Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal; Chile
Fil: Preti, Michele. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ).· Faculty of Science and Technology; Italia
Fil: Cichón, Liliana Isabel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Fuentes-Contreras, Eduardo. Universidad de Talca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Chile
Fil: Barros-Parada, Wilson. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (PUCV). Escuela de Agronomía; Chile
Fil: Krawczyk, Greg. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Nunes, Marcelo Z. Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Department of Entomology. Fruit Research and Extension Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Walgenbach, Jim F. North Carolina State University. Mountain Horticultural Crops Research & Extension Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hansen, Randy. Hansen Associates; Estados Unidos
Knight, Alan L. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidos
description Male and female moth catches of Grapholita molesta (Busck) in traps were evaluated in stone and pome fruit orchards untreated or treated with sex pheromones for mating disruption in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, USA, and Italy from 2015 to 2017. Trials evaluated various blends loaded into either membrane cup lures or septa. Membrane lures were loaded with terpinyl acetate (TA), acetic acid (AA) and (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate alone or in combinations. Two septa lures were loaded with either the three‐component sex pheromone blend for G. molesta alone or in combination with codlemone (2‐PH), the sex pheromone of Cydia pomonella (L). A third septum lure included the combination sex pheromone blend plus pear ester, (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (2‐PH/PE), and a fourth septum was loaded with only β‐ocimene. Results were consistent across geographical areas showing that the addition of β‐ocimene or (Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate did not increase moth catches. The addition of pear ester to the sex pheromone lure marginally increased moth catches. The use of TA and AA together significantly increased moth catches compared with the use of only one of the two components. Traps with the TA/AA lure outperformed the Ajar trap baited with a liquid TA plus sugar bait. The emission rate of AA was not a significant factor affecting the performance of the TA/AA lure. The addition of TA/AA significantly increased moth catches when combined with the 2‐PH lure. The TA/AA lure also allowed traps to catch both sexes. Catch of C. pomonella with the 2‐PH lure was comparable to the use of codlemone; however, moth catch was significantly reduced with the 2‐PH/PE lure. Optimization of these complex lures can likely further improve managers’ ability to monitor G. molesta and help to develop multispecies tortricid lures for use in individual traps.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09
2019-02-12T18:22:38Z
2019-02-12T18:22:38Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4434
1439-0418
0931-2048
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-018-0111-2
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4434
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-018-0111-2
identifier_str_mv 1439-0418
0931-2048
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of applied entomology 142 (8) : 731-744 .(September 2018)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341363174080512
score 12.623145