Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance

Autores
Quiñones Martorello, Adriana; Gyenge, Javier; Colabelli, Mabel Noemí; Petigrosso, Lucas R; Fernandez, María Elena
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
There is generally a trade-off in the resistance to drought and to waterlogging. However, several species are sequentially subjected to both stressors in many environments. We evaluated the ecophysiological strategies to cope with multiple sequential stress of waterlogging and drought (W + D) of three taxa differing in stress resistance and root morphology: the phreatophic Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Ec) and two shallow-rooted willow clones: Salix matsudana x Salix alba (SmxSa) and Salix nigra (Sn4). Individuals of the three taxa were grown in pots and assigned to either of four treatments: Control (well-watered plants), well-watered followed by drought (C + D); waterlogged for 15 days followed by drought (W15d + D) and waterlogged for 30 days followed by drought (W30d + D). Biomass allocation, growth (diameter, height, length of leaves, and roots), specific leaf area, stomatal conductance, water potential, hydraulic conductivity of roots and branches, leaf C13and root cortical aerenchyma formation were determined at different stages of the experiment. Ec growth was not affected by W + D, developing tolerance strategies at leaf and whole plant levels. Differential effects of W + D were observed in both Salix clones depending on the time of waterlogging. In Sn4 and SmxSa, the root biomass was affected in W15d + D treatment, but a root tolerance response (aerenchyma and adventitious root formation) was observed in W30d + D. In the three taxa, and contrary to expectations, the previous exposure to a waterlogging period did not increase the susceptibility of the plants to a subsequent drought event. On the contrary, we found tolerance, which depended on the time of waterlogging exposure.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Quiñones Martorello, Adriana Silvia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina
Fil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. LIA FORESTIA; Argentina. Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement; Francia.
Fil: Colabelli, Mabel Noemi. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Petigrosso, Lucas Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. LIA FORESTIA; Argentina. Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement; Francia.
Fuente
Physiologia Plantarum 175 (4) : e13958 (July/August 2023)
Materia
Conductividad Hidráulica
Biomasa
Respuesta Fisiológica
Desarrollo Forestal
Hydraulic Conductivity
Biomass
Physiological Response
Forestry Development
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/17732
Acceder
id INTADig_875ea11b86389167dcfdc989754ac4f5
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/17732
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress toleranceQuiñones Martorello, AdrianaGyenge, JavierColabelli, Mabel NoemíPetigrosso, Lucas RFernandez, María ElenaConductividad HidráulicaBiomasaRespuesta FisiológicaDesarrollo ForestalHydraulic ConductivityBiomassPhysiological ResponseForestry DevelopmentThere is generally a trade-off in the resistance to drought and to waterlogging. However, several species are sequentially subjected to both stressors in many environments. We evaluated the ecophysiological strategies to cope with multiple sequential stress of waterlogging and drought (W + D) of three taxa differing in stress resistance and root morphology: the phreatophic Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Ec) and two shallow-rooted willow clones: Salix matsudana x Salix alba (SmxSa) and Salix nigra (Sn4). Individuals of the three taxa were grown in pots and assigned to either of four treatments: Control (well-watered plants), well-watered followed by drought (C + D); waterlogged for 15 days followed by drought (W15d + D) and waterlogged for 30 days followed by drought (W30d + D). Biomass allocation, growth (diameter, height, length of leaves, and roots), specific leaf area, stomatal conductance, water potential, hydraulic conductivity of roots and branches, leaf C13and root cortical aerenchyma formation were determined at different stages of the experiment. Ec growth was not affected by W + D, developing tolerance strategies at leaf and whole plant levels. Differential effects of W + D were observed in both Salix clones depending on the time of waterlogging. In Sn4 and SmxSa, the root biomass was affected in W15d + D treatment, but a root tolerance response (aerenchyma and adventitious root formation) was observed in W30d + D. In the three taxa, and contrary to expectations, the previous exposure to a waterlogging period did not increase the susceptibility of the plants to a subsequent drought event. On the contrary, we found tolerance, which depended on the time of waterlogging exposure.EEA BalcarceFil: Quiñones Martorello, Adriana Silvia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; ArgentinaFil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. LIA FORESTIA; Argentina. Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement; Francia.Fil: Colabelli, Mabel Noemi. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Petigrosso, Lucas Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, María Elena. LIA FORESTIA; Argentina. Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement; Francia.Wiley2024-05-14T18:33:18Z2024-05-14T18:33:18Z2023-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/17732https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ppl.139580031-9317 (print)1399-3054 (online)https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13958Physiologia Plantarum 175 (4) : e13958 (July/August 2023)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNFOR/1104073/AR./Bases silvícolas para sustentar la productividad de las plantaciones y los recursos del ambiente.info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:46:31Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/17732instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:46:32.202INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
title Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
spellingShingle Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
Quiñones Martorello, Adriana
Conductividad Hidráulica
Biomasa
Respuesta Fisiológica
Desarrollo Forestal
Hydraulic Conductivity
Biomass
Physiological Response
Forestry Development
title_short Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
title_full Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
title_fullStr Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
title_full_unstemmed Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
title_sort Functional responses to multiple sequential abiotic stress (waterlogging-drought) in three woody taxa with different root systems and stress tolerance
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Quiñones Martorello, Adriana
Gyenge, Javier
Colabelli, Mabel Noemí
Petigrosso, Lucas R
Fernandez, María Elena
author Quiñones Martorello, Adriana
author_facet Quiñones Martorello, Adriana
Gyenge, Javier
Colabelli, Mabel Noemí
Petigrosso, Lucas R
Fernandez, María Elena
author_role author
author2 Gyenge, Javier
Colabelli, Mabel Noemí
Petigrosso, Lucas R
Fernandez, María Elena
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Conductividad Hidráulica
Biomasa
Respuesta Fisiológica
Desarrollo Forestal
Hydraulic Conductivity
Biomass
Physiological Response
Forestry Development
topic Conductividad Hidráulica
Biomasa
Respuesta Fisiológica
Desarrollo Forestal
Hydraulic Conductivity
Biomass
Physiological Response
Forestry Development
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv There is generally a trade-off in the resistance to drought and to waterlogging. However, several species are sequentially subjected to both stressors in many environments. We evaluated the ecophysiological strategies to cope with multiple sequential stress of waterlogging and drought (W + D) of three taxa differing in stress resistance and root morphology: the phreatophic Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Ec) and two shallow-rooted willow clones: Salix matsudana x Salix alba (SmxSa) and Salix nigra (Sn4). Individuals of the three taxa were grown in pots and assigned to either of four treatments: Control (well-watered plants), well-watered followed by drought (C + D); waterlogged for 15 days followed by drought (W15d + D) and waterlogged for 30 days followed by drought (W30d + D). Biomass allocation, growth (diameter, height, length of leaves, and roots), specific leaf area, stomatal conductance, water potential, hydraulic conductivity of roots and branches, leaf C13and root cortical aerenchyma formation were determined at different stages of the experiment. Ec growth was not affected by W + D, developing tolerance strategies at leaf and whole plant levels. Differential effects of W + D were observed in both Salix clones depending on the time of waterlogging. In Sn4 and SmxSa, the root biomass was affected in W15d + D treatment, but a root tolerance response (aerenchyma and adventitious root formation) was observed in W30d + D. In the three taxa, and contrary to expectations, the previous exposure to a waterlogging period did not increase the susceptibility of the plants to a subsequent drought event. On the contrary, we found tolerance, which depended on the time of waterlogging exposure.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Quiñones Martorello, Adriana Silvia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina
Fil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. LIA FORESTIA; Argentina. Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement; Francia.
Fil: Colabelli, Mabel Noemi. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Petigrosso, Lucas Ricardo. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. LIA FORESTIA; Argentina. Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement; Francia.
description There is generally a trade-off in the resistance to drought and to waterlogging. However, several species are sequentially subjected to both stressors in many environments. We evaluated the ecophysiological strategies to cope with multiple sequential stress of waterlogging and drought (W + D) of three taxa differing in stress resistance and root morphology: the phreatophic Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Ec) and two shallow-rooted willow clones: Salix matsudana x Salix alba (SmxSa) and Salix nigra (Sn4). Individuals of the three taxa were grown in pots and assigned to either of four treatments: Control (well-watered plants), well-watered followed by drought (C + D); waterlogged for 15 days followed by drought (W15d + D) and waterlogged for 30 days followed by drought (W30d + D). Biomass allocation, growth (diameter, height, length of leaves, and roots), specific leaf area, stomatal conductance, water potential, hydraulic conductivity of roots and branches, leaf C13and root cortical aerenchyma formation were determined at different stages of the experiment. Ec growth was not affected by W + D, developing tolerance strategies at leaf and whole plant levels. Differential effects of W + D were observed in both Salix clones depending on the time of waterlogging. In Sn4 and SmxSa, the root biomass was affected in W15d + D treatment, but a root tolerance response (aerenchyma and adventitious root formation) was observed in W30d + D. In the three taxa, and contrary to expectations, the previous exposure to a waterlogging period did not increase the susceptibility of the plants to a subsequent drought event. On the contrary, we found tolerance, which depended on the time of waterlogging exposure.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-23
2024-05-14T18:33:18Z
2024-05-14T18:33:18Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/17732
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ppl.13958
0031-9317 (print)
1399-3054 (online)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13958
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/17732
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ppl.13958
https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13958
identifier_str_mv 0031-9317 (print)
1399-3054 (online)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNFOR/1104073/AR./Bases silvícolas para sustentar la productividad de las plantaciones y los recursos del ambiente.
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Physiologia Plantarum 175 (4) : e13958 (July/August 2023)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619188040105984
score 12.559606

Publicaciones similares