Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture
- Autores
- Paolinelli, Marcos; Martinez, Laura Elizabeth; Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia; Diaz-Quirós, Camilo; Belmonte, Marcelo; Ahumada, Gastón; Pirrone, Miguel A.; Farber, Marisa Diana; Escoriaza, Maria Georgina; Longone, Maria Valeria; Gonzalez, Magali Lucia Rosa; Lerena, María Cecilia; Combina, Mariana; Mercado, Laura Analia
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Rhizosphere microorganisms are considered an extension of plants, representing critical actors involved in the promotion of plant nutrient intake from the surrounding environment. Consequently, a great focus is being made on soil microorganisms since they are considered a promising source for crop resilience improvements under a global climate change scenario. To explore bacterial and fungal communities from arid soils in vineyards and their surroundings from two regions with very different climate and tillage histories, an amplicon sequencing analysis was performed. Specifically, Santa Rosa (SR) is in a region commonly known as the first zone, characterised by low altitude (607 m.a.s.l., Winkler V), while Gualtallary (G) is in the Uco Valley Zone, a region with high altitude (1245 m.a.s.l., Winkler III); both in the productive wine region of Mendoza. SR is characterised by its long cultivation history, while G is a recently cultivated region. Topsoil samples were collected and used for bacterial and fungal community profile characterisation. Ascomycota was the predominant phylum (38–97 %) in mycobiome composition, whereas Proteobacteria was the most abundant bacterial phylum (26–34 %) in both regions. Moreover, the main factor explaining microbiome differences between regions was the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Anaerolineae and Gammaproteobacteria were a distinctive bacterial class in SR-cultivated soils. Azospirillales were highly abundant in SR uncultivated soils, while Rhizobiales were differentially abundant in G uncultivated soils. Regarding functional analysis, soils from SR showed a higher denitrification activity of nitrifiers as well as glucose-related metabolism, while in G soils, bacterial photosynthesis activities were a differential trait. In addition, Actinobacteria abundance was lower in SR-cultivated soils, indicating a higher susceptibility of this phylum to grapevine crop practices. These results allow the development of hypothetical models of the local microbial resources and their contribution to grapevine nutrition, which is highly important to elaborate recommendations for grapevine management to preserve soil health in vine areas of Mendoza.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Paolinelli, Marcos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Martínez, Laura E. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rama Caída; Argentina
Fil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil Díaz-Quirós, Camilo. Biovin SA (Mendoza); Argentina
Fil: Belmonte, Marcelo. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Ahumada, Gastón. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Pirrone, Miguel A. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Farber, Marisa Diana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Escoriaza, Georgina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Longone, Valeria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: González, Magalí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: González, Magalí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Buenos Aires, Argentina
Fil: Lerena, Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Lerena, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Combina, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Combina, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mercado, Laura A. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Mercado, Laura A. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina - Fuente
- OENO One 57 (1) : 191 (2023)
- Materia
-
Microbioma
Suelo
Viticultura
Agroecología
Mendoza
Agentes de Control Biológico
Microbiomes
Soil
Viticulture
Agroecology
Biological Control Agents
Metagenomics - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/23407
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_6541a39db96eaf1914a7819765b6b397 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/23407 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticultureMicrobioma en suelos de Mendoza: recursos microbianos para el desarrollo de la gestión agroecológica en la viticulturaPaolinelli, MarcosMartinez, Laura ElizabethGarcia Lampasona, Sandra ClaudiaDiaz-Quirós, CamiloBelmonte, MarceloAhumada, GastónPirrone, Miguel A.Farber, Marisa DianaEscoriaza, Maria GeorginaLongone, Maria ValeriaGonzalez, Magali Lucia RosaLerena, María CeciliaCombina, MarianaMercado, Laura AnaliaMicrobiomaSueloViticulturaAgroecologíaMendozaAgentes de Control BiológicoMicrobiomesSoilViticultureAgroecologyBiological Control AgentsMetagenomicsRhizosphere microorganisms are considered an extension of plants, representing critical actors involved in the promotion of plant nutrient intake from the surrounding environment. Consequently, a great focus is being made on soil microorganisms since they are considered a promising source for crop resilience improvements under a global climate change scenario. To explore bacterial and fungal communities from arid soils in vineyards and their surroundings from two regions with very different climate and tillage histories, an amplicon sequencing analysis was performed. Specifically, Santa Rosa (SR) is in a region commonly known as the first zone, characterised by low altitude (607 m.a.s.l., Winkler V), while Gualtallary (G) is in the Uco Valley Zone, a region with high altitude (1245 m.a.s.l., Winkler III); both in the productive wine region of Mendoza. SR is characterised by its long cultivation history, while G is a recently cultivated region. Topsoil samples were collected and used for bacterial and fungal community profile characterisation. Ascomycota was the predominant phylum (38–97 %) in mycobiome composition, whereas Proteobacteria was the most abundant bacterial phylum (26–34 %) in both regions. Moreover, the main factor explaining microbiome differences between regions was the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Anaerolineae and Gammaproteobacteria were a distinctive bacterial class in SR-cultivated soils. Azospirillales were highly abundant in SR uncultivated soils, while Rhizobiales were differentially abundant in G uncultivated soils. Regarding functional analysis, soils from SR showed a higher denitrification activity of nitrifiers as well as glucose-related metabolism, while in G soils, bacterial photosynthesis activities were a differential trait. In addition, Actinobacteria abundance was lower in SR-cultivated soils, indicating a higher susceptibility of this phylum to grapevine crop practices. These results allow the development of hypothetical models of the local microbial resources and their contribution to grapevine nutrition, which is highly important to elaborate recommendations for grapevine management to preserve soil health in vine areas of Mendoza.EEA MendozaFil: Paolinelli, Marcos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Martínez, Laura E. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rama Caída; ArgentinaFil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil Díaz-Quirós, Camilo. Biovin SA (Mendoza); ArgentinaFil: Belmonte, Marcelo. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Ahumada, Gastón. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Pirrone, Miguel A. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Farber, Marisa Diana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Escoriaza, Georgina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Longone, Valeria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: González, Magalí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: González, Magalí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Buenos Aires, ArgentinaFil: Lerena, Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Lerena, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Combina, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Combina, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Mercado, Laura A. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Mercado, Laura A. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaOeno One2025-08-12T12:08:06Z2025-08-12T12:08:06Z2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23407https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/55852494-1271https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5585OENO One 57 (1) : 191 (2023)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E10-I205-001, Alternativas socio-agro-ambientales: prospectiva, observatorios y ordenamiento territorial para la sustentabilidad agroalimentariainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-18T10:10:12Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/23407instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-18 10:10:12.73INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture Microbioma en suelos de Mendoza: recursos microbianos para el desarrollo de la gestión agroecológica en la viticultura |
title |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture |
spellingShingle |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture Paolinelli, Marcos Microbioma Suelo Viticultura Agroecología Mendoza Agentes de Control Biológico Microbiomes Soil Viticulture Agroecology Biological Control Agents Metagenomics |
title_short |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture |
title_full |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture |
title_fullStr |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture |
title_sort |
Microbiome in soils of Mendoza: microbial resources for the development of agroecological management in viticulture |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Paolinelli, Marcos Martinez, Laura Elizabeth Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia Diaz-Quirós, Camilo Belmonte, Marcelo Ahumada, Gastón Pirrone, Miguel A. Farber, Marisa Diana Escoriaza, Maria Georgina Longone, Maria Valeria Gonzalez, Magali Lucia Rosa Lerena, María Cecilia Combina, Mariana Mercado, Laura Analia |
author |
Paolinelli, Marcos |
author_facet |
Paolinelli, Marcos Martinez, Laura Elizabeth Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia Diaz-Quirós, Camilo Belmonte, Marcelo Ahumada, Gastón Pirrone, Miguel A. Farber, Marisa Diana Escoriaza, Maria Georgina Longone, Maria Valeria Gonzalez, Magali Lucia Rosa Lerena, María Cecilia Combina, Mariana Mercado, Laura Analia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martinez, Laura Elizabeth Garcia Lampasona, Sandra Claudia Diaz-Quirós, Camilo Belmonte, Marcelo Ahumada, Gastón Pirrone, Miguel A. Farber, Marisa Diana Escoriaza, Maria Georgina Longone, Maria Valeria Gonzalez, Magali Lucia Rosa Lerena, María Cecilia Combina, Mariana Mercado, Laura Analia |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Microbioma Suelo Viticultura Agroecología Mendoza Agentes de Control Biológico Microbiomes Soil Viticulture Agroecology Biological Control Agents Metagenomics |
topic |
Microbioma Suelo Viticultura Agroecología Mendoza Agentes de Control Biológico Microbiomes Soil Viticulture Agroecology Biological Control Agents Metagenomics |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Rhizosphere microorganisms are considered an extension of plants, representing critical actors involved in the promotion of plant nutrient intake from the surrounding environment. Consequently, a great focus is being made on soil microorganisms since they are considered a promising source for crop resilience improvements under a global climate change scenario. To explore bacterial and fungal communities from arid soils in vineyards and their surroundings from two regions with very different climate and tillage histories, an amplicon sequencing analysis was performed. Specifically, Santa Rosa (SR) is in a region commonly known as the first zone, characterised by low altitude (607 m.a.s.l., Winkler V), while Gualtallary (G) is in the Uco Valley Zone, a region with high altitude (1245 m.a.s.l., Winkler III); both in the productive wine region of Mendoza. SR is characterised by its long cultivation history, while G is a recently cultivated region. Topsoil samples were collected and used for bacterial and fungal community profile characterisation. Ascomycota was the predominant phylum (38–97 %) in mycobiome composition, whereas Proteobacteria was the most abundant bacterial phylum (26–34 %) in both regions. Moreover, the main factor explaining microbiome differences between regions was the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Anaerolineae and Gammaproteobacteria were a distinctive bacterial class in SR-cultivated soils. Azospirillales were highly abundant in SR uncultivated soils, while Rhizobiales were differentially abundant in G uncultivated soils. Regarding functional analysis, soils from SR showed a higher denitrification activity of nitrifiers as well as glucose-related metabolism, while in G soils, bacterial photosynthesis activities were a differential trait. In addition, Actinobacteria abundance was lower in SR-cultivated soils, indicating a higher susceptibility of this phylum to grapevine crop practices. These results allow the development of hypothetical models of the local microbial resources and their contribution to grapevine nutrition, which is highly important to elaborate recommendations for grapevine management to preserve soil health in vine areas of Mendoza. EEA Mendoza Fil: Paolinelli, Marcos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Martínez, Laura E. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rama Caída; Argentina Fil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: García Lampasona, Sandra. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil Díaz-Quirós, Camilo. Biovin SA (Mendoza); Argentina Fil: Belmonte, Marcelo. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Ahumada, Gastón. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Pirrone, Miguel A. Bodega Trapiche Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Farber, Marisa Diana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Escoriaza, Georgina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Longone, Valeria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: González, Magalí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: González, Magalí. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Lerena, Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Lerena, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Combina, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Combina, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Mercado, Laura A. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Mercado, Laura A. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina |
description |
Rhizosphere microorganisms are considered an extension of plants, representing critical actors involved in the promotion of plant nutrient intake from the surrounding environment. Consequently, a great focus is being made on soil microorganisms since they are considered a promising source for crop resilience improvements under a global climate change scenario. To explore bacterial and fungal communities from arid soils in vineyards and their surroundings from two regions with very different climate and tillage histories, an amplicon sequencing analysis was performed. Specifically, Santa Rosa (SR) is in a region commonly known as the first zone, characterised by low altitude (607 m.a.s.l., Winkler V), while Gualtallary (G) is in the Uco Valley Zone, a region with high altitude (1245 m.a.s.l., Winkler III); both in the productive wine region of Mendoza. SR is characterised by its long cultivation history, while G is a recently cultivated region. Topsoil samples were collected and used for bacterial and fungal community profile characterisation. Ascomycota was the predominant phylum (38–97 %) in mycobiome composition, whereas Proteobacteria was the most abundant bacterial phylum (26–34 %) in both regions. Moreover, the main factor explaining microbiome differences between regions was the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Anaerolineae and Gammaproteobacteria were a distinctive bacterial class in SR-cultivated soils. Azospirillales were highly abundant in SR uncultivated soils, while Rhizobiales were differentially abundant in G uncultivated soils. Regarding functional analysis, soils from SR showed a higher denitrification activity of nitrifiers as well as glucose-related metabolism, while in G soils, bacterial photosynthesis activities were a differential trait. In addition, Actinobacteria abundance was lower in SR-cultivated soils, indicating a higher susceptibility of this phylum to grapevine crop practices. These results allow the development of hypothetical models of the local microbial resources and their contribution to grapevine nutrition, which is highly important to elaborate recommendations for grapevine management to preserve soil health in vine areas of Mendoza. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 2025-08-12T12:08:06Z 2025-08-12T12:08:06Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23407 https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/5585 2494-1271 https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5585 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23407 https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/5585 https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5585 |
identifier_str_mv |
2494-1271 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E10-I205-001, Alternativas socio-agro-ambientales: prospectiva, observatorios y ordenamiento territorial para la sustentabilidad agroalimentaria |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oeno One |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oeno One |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
OENO One 57 (1) : 191 (2023) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1843609252047880192 |
score |
13.001348 |