Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
- Autores
- Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- No till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristics
Fil: Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Argentina. Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID), Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina
Fil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina - Fuente
- Soil & Tillage Research 211 (3) : 105022 (July 2021)
- Materia
-
Zero Tillage
Soil Chemicophysical Properties
Crop Yield
Cero-labranza
Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo
Rendimiento de Cultivos
Deep Non-inversion Tillage
Labranza Profunda sin Inversión
Región Pampeana - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10758
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_56aefd93adaeab1a0972bba1836df31a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10758 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysisPeralta, Guillermo EzequielAlvarez, Carina RosaTaboada, Miguel AngelZero TillageSoil Chemicophysical PropertiesCrop YieldCero-labranzaPropiedades Físico-Químicas SueloRendimiento de CultivosDeep Non-inversion TillageLabranza Profunda sin InversiónRegión PampeanaNo till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristicsFil: Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Argentina. Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID), ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; ArgentinaFil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; ArgentinaElsevier2021-11-12T10:42:52Z2021-11-12T10:42:52Z2021-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10758https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S01671987210009210167-1987https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105022Soil & Tillage Research 211 (3) : 105022 (July 2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:49:11Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/10758instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:11.631INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis |
title |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis |
spellingShingle |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel Zero Tillage Soil Chemicophysical Properties Crop Yield Cero-labranza Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo Rendimiento de Cultivos Deep Non-inversion Tillage Labranza Profunda sin Inversión Región Pampeana |
title_short |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis |
title_full |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis |
title_fullStr |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis |
title_sort |
Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel Alvarez, Carina Rosa Taboada, Miguel Angel |
author |
Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel |
author_facet |
Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel Alvarez, Carina Rosa Taboada, Miguel Angel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alvarez, Carina Rosa Taboada, Miguel Angel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Zero Tillage Soil Chemicophysical Properties Crop Yield Cero-labranza Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo Rendimiento de Cultivos Deep Non-inversion Tillage Labranza Profunda sin Inversión Región Pampeana |
topic |
Zero Tillage Soil Chemicophysical Properties Crop Yield Cero-labranza Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo Rendimiento de Cultivos Deep Non-inversion Tillage Labranza Profunda sin Inversión Región Pampeana |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
No till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristics Fil: Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Argentina. Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID), Argentina Fil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina Fil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina |
description |
No till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristics |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-12T10:42:52Z 2021-11-12T10:42:52Z 2021-05-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10758 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198721000921 0167-1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105022 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10758 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198721000921 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105022 |
identifier_str_mv |
0167-1987 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Soil & Tillage Research 211 (3) : 105022 (July 2021) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842341392255287296 |
score |
12.623145 |