Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis

Autores
Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
No till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristics
Fil: Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Argentina. Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID), Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina
Fil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina
Fuente
Soil & Tillage Research 211 (3) : 105022 (July 2021)
Materia
Zero Tillage
Soil Chemicophysical Properties
Crop Yield
Cero-labranza
Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo
Rendimiento de Cultivos
Deep Non-inversion Tillage
Labranza Profunda sin Inversión
Región Pampeana
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10758

id INTADig_56aefd93adaeab1a0972bba1836df31a
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10758
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysisPeralta, Guillermo EzequielAlvarez, Carina RosaTaboada, Miguel AngelZero TillageSoil Chemicophysical PropertiesCrop YieldCero-labranzaPropiedades Físico-Químicas SueloRendimiento de CultivosDeep Non-inversion TillageLabranza Profunda sin InversiónRegión PampeanaNo till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristicsFil: Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Argentina. Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID), ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; ArgentinaFil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; ArgentinaElsevier2021-11-12T10:42:52Z2021-11-12T10:42:52Z2021-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10758https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S01671987210009210167-1987https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105022Soil & Tillage Research 211 (3) : 105022 (July 2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:49:11Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/10758instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:11.631INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
title Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
spellingShingle Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel
Zero Tillage
Soil Chemicophysical Properties
Crop Yield
Cero-labranza
Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo
Rendimiento de Cultivos
Deep Non-inversion Tillage
Labranza Profunda sin Inversión
Región Pampeana
title_short Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
title_full Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
title_fullStr Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
title_full_unstemmed Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
title_sort Soil compaction alleviation by deep non - inversion tillage and crop yield responses in no tilled soils of the Pampas Region of Argentina. A meta - analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel
Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel
author_facet Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel
Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author_role author
author2 Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Zero Tillage
Soil Chemicophysical Properties
Crop Yield
Cero-labranza
Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo
Rendimiento de Cultivos
Deep Non-inversion Tillage
Labranza Profunda sin Inversión
Región Pampeana
topic Zero Tillage
Soil Chemicophysical Properties
Crop Yield
Cero-labranza
Propiedades Físico-Químicas Suelo
Rendimiento de Cultivos
Deep Non-inversion Tillage
Labranza Profunda sin Inversión
Región Pampeana
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv No till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristics
Fil: Peralta, Guillermo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Argentina. Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID), Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina
Fil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes; Argentina
description No till is considered part of the good management practices recommended in conservation agriculture. Regardless of the benefits of this practice, shallow compaction or soil hardening by farm machinery traffic can lead to soil constraints to crop growth. Deep non-inversion tillage could be proposed together with other practices to alleviate this soil compaction. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed experimental results (32 field studies) obtained throughout the Pampas Region focused on the immediate effects and duration of soil mechanical alleviation measured by relevant soil physical properties and by the impact on maize and soybean yield. Treatments were classified in: a) Control (no tilled soils), and b) Subsoiled (no tilled soil subjected to mechanical compaction alleviation by deep non-inversion tillage). Data were analyzed by comparing pairs of the same experiment (t-paired test). The response to compaction alleviation (Δ Subsoiled - Control) for different soil variables was related to soil and climate and agricultural history management. Deep non-inversion tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density (0− 0.20 m; P < 0.0001; -4.3 % in average), increased infiltration rate fivefold (Δ = +213 mm.h− 1) and decreased soil penetration resistance in the 0− 0.20 m layer 44 % in average (Δ = -0.86 MPa). Soil penetrometer resistance profiles (0 to 0.4 m) of Control situations peaked at 0.15− 0.20 m. This peak disappeared in deep tillage, showing significant penetration resistance decreases at these layers. Soil compaction alleviation works had a durability of not more than 17 months (±2.8 months) after being performed. Deep non-inversion tillage enhanced soybean yields (26 % on average; Δ = +561 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001), mainly in yields lower than 2000 kg. ha− 1, usually associated with clay soils. In maize, mean responses to deep non- inversion tillage were only 6% (Δ = +567 kg. ha− 1; P < 0.0001). Considering these results, deep non- inversion tillage could be a promising practice to close rainfed crop yield gaps in the region. Nevertheless, due to its low durability in time, it is strategic to incorporate further compaction prevention and structural regeneration practices such as cover crops, diversified crop rotations and controlled traffic according to soil and environment characteristics
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-12T10:42:52Z
2021-11-12T10:42:52Z
2021-05-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10758
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198721000921
0167-1987
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105022
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10758
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198721000921
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105022
identifier_str_mv 0167-1987
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Soil & Tillage Research 211 (3) : 105022 (July 2021)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341392255287296
score 12.623145