Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard
- Autores
- Magdalena, Jorge Carlos; Val Manterola, Luis; Di Prinzio, Alcides Pascual; Behmer, Sergio Néstor
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión aceptada
- Descripción
- In Argentina, the North Patagonian Region is the largest producing area of apples and pears of the Southern Hemisphere. In modern pomology, the study of new sprayer design to optimize pesticide delivery to fruit crops it is a priority. The aim of this research was to compare the efficiency of pesticide application between a conventional air-carrier sprayer (axial-fan) and a cross flow sprayer (4 cross-flow fans) using two volume rates, standard and 80 %. The results showed that the best performance was obtained with the cross flow sprayer. Control of Codling moth was more difficult inside than outside the canopy, since the fruit damage was near two fold in the later. However, under the test conditions the cross flow sprayer showed acceptable and uniform pesticide coverage inside the canopy, and at different tree heights (top, middle and bottom). The better spray distribution of the cross flow sprayer provided a good control of codling moth even at a reduced volume rate. The cross flow sprayer allowed to reduce exodrift losses beyond the top of the trees by 5to 8 fold, however, the endodrift within row increased.
EEA Alto Valle
Fil: Magdalena, Jorge Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Val Manterola, Luis. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Departamento de Ingeniería Rural y Agroalimentaria; España
Fil: Di Prinzio, Alcides Pascual. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Behmer, Sergio Néstor. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina - Fuente
- International Conference Agriculture Engineering. Valencia Conference Center. Valencia, Spain. July 8-12, 2012.
- Materia
-
Apples
Pest Control
Sprayers
Manzana
Control de Plagas
Pulverizadores
Orchard Sprayers
Deciduous Fruit Trees
Codling Moth
Pulverizadores para Huertos
Árboles Frutales de Hoja Caduca
Polilla de la Manzana - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21453
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_53e8cf026009f79b94c7ed72876435e5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21453 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchardMagdalena, Jorge CarlosVal Manterola, LuisDi Prinzio, Alcides PascualBehmer, Sergio NéstorApplesPest ControlSprayersManzanaControl de PlagasPulverizadoresOrchard SprayersDeciduous Fruit TreesCodling MothPulverizadores para HuertosÁrboles Frutales de Hoja CaducaPolilla de la ManzanaIn Argentina, the North Patagonian Region is the largest producing area of apples and pears of the Southern Hemisphere. In modern pomology, the study of new sprayer design to optimize pesticide delivery to fruit crops it is a priority. The aim of this research was to compare the efficiency of pesticide application between a conventional air-carrier sprayer (axial-fan) and a cross flow sprayer (4 cross-flow fans) using two volume rates, standard and 80 %. The results showed that the best performance was obtained with the cross flow sprayer. Control of Codling moth was more difficult inside than outside the canopy, since the fruit damage was near two fold in the later. However, under the test conditions the cross flow sprayer showed acceptable and uniform pesticide coverage inside the canopy, and at different tree heights (top, middle and bottom). The better spray distribution of the cross flow sprayer provided a good control of codling moth even at a reduced volume rate. The cross flow sprayer allowed to reduce exodrift losses beyond the top of the trees by 5to 8 fold, however, the endodrift within row increased.EEA Alto ValleFil: Magdalena, Jorge Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; ArgentinaFil: Val Manterola, Luis. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Departamento de Ingeniería Rural y Agroalimentaria; EspañaFil: Di Prinzio, Alcides Pascual. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Behmer, Sergio Néstor. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina2025-02-25T14:29:41Z2025-02-25T14:29:41Z2013-06info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21453International Conference Agriculture Engineering. Valencia Conference Center. Valencia, Spain. July 8-12, 2012.reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:47:07Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/21453instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:47:07.563INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard |
title |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard |
spellingShingle |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard Magdalena, Jorge Carlos Apples Pest Control Sprayers Manzana Control de Plagas Pulverizadores Orchard Sprayers Deciduous Fruit Trees Codling Moth Pulverizadores para Huertos Árboles Frutales de Hoja Caduca Polilla de la Manzana |
title_short |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard |
title_full |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard |
title_fullStr |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard |
title_sort |
Effect of a cross flow sprayer and an air-carrier, axial-fan sprayer on the quality distribution, pest control and drift in an apple orchard |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Magdalena, Jorge Carlos Val Manterola, Luis Di Prinzio, Alcides Pascual Behmer, Sergio Néstor |
author |
Magdalena, Jorge Carlos |
author_facet |
Magdalena, Jorge Carlos Val Manterola, Luis Di Prinzio, Alcides Pascual Behmer, Sergio Néstor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Val Manterola, Luis Di Prinzio, Alcides Pascual Behmer, Sergio Néstor |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Apples Pest Control Sprayers Manzana Control de Plagas Pulverizadores Orchard Sprayers Deciduous Fruit Trees Codling Moth Pulverizadores para Huertos Árboles Frutales de Hoja Caduca Polilla de la Manzana |
topic |
Apples Pest Control Sprayers Manzana Control de Plagas Pulverizadores Orchard Sprayers Deciduous Fruit Trees Codling Moth Pulverizadores para Huertos Árboles Frutales de Hoja Caduca Polilla de la Manzana |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In Argentina, the North Patagonian Region is the largest producing area of apples and pears of the Southern Hemisphere. In modern pomology, the study of new sprayer design to optimize pesticide delivery to fruit crops it is a priority. The aim of this research was to compare the efficiency of pesticide application between a conventional air-carrier sprayer (axial-fan) and a cross flow sprayer (4 cross-flow fans) using two volume rates, standard and 80 %. The results showed that the best performance was obtained with the cross flow sprayer. Control of Codling moth was more difficult inside than outside the canopy, since the fruit damage was near two fold in the later. However, under the test conditions the cross flow sprayer showed acceptable and uniform pesticide coverage inside the canopy, and at different tree heights (top, middle and bottom). The better spray distribution of the cross flow sprayer provided a good control of codling moth even at a reduced volume rate. The cross flow sprayer allowed to reduce exodrift losses beyond the top of the trees by 5to 8 fold, however, the endodrift within row increased. EEA Alto Valle Fil: Magdalena, Jorge Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina Fil: Val Manterola, Luis. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Departamento de Ingeniería Rural y Agroalimentaria; España Fil: Di Prinzio, Alcides Pascual. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: Behmer, Sergio Néstor. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina |
description |
In Argentina, the North Patagonian Region is the largest producing area of apples and pears of the Southern Hemisphere. In modern pomology, the study of new sprayer design to optimize pesticide delivery to fruit crops it is a priority. The aim of this research was to compare the efficiency of pesticide application between a conventional air-carrier sprayer (axial-fan) and a cross flow sprayer (4 cross-flow fans) using two volume rates, standard and 80 %. The results showed that the best performance was obtained with the cross flow sprayer. Control of Codling moth was more difficult inside than outside the canopy, since the fruit damage was near two fold in the later. However, under the test conditions the cross flow sprayer showed acceptable and uniform pesticide coverage inside the canopy, and at different tree heights (top, middle and bottom). The better spray distribution of the cross flow sprayer provided a good control of codling moth even at a reduced volume rate. The cross flow sprayer allowed to reduce exodrift losses beyond the top of the trees by 5to 8 fold, however, the endodrift within row increased. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-06 2025-02-25T14:29:41Z 2025-02-25T14:29:41Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
acceptedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21453 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21453 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Conference Agriculture Engineering. Valencia Conference Center. Valencia, Spain. July 8-12, 2012. reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619200028475392 |
score |
12.559606 |