Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina

Autores
Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.; Hiller, Josh; Branch, Lyn C.; Núñez Godoy, Cristina; Siddiqui, Sharmin; Volante, Jose Norberto; Soto, José R.
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Payment for ecosystem services schemes (PES) are lauded as a market-based solution to curtail deforestation and restore degraded ecosystems. However, PES programs often fail to conserve sites under strong long-term deforestation pressures. Underperformance, in part, is likely due to adverse selection. Spatial adverse selection occurs when landowners are more likely to enroll parcels with low deforestation pressure than parcels with high deforestation pressure. Temporal adverse selection arises when parcels are enrolled for short time periods. In both cases, financial resources are allocated without having a sizeable impact on long-term land use change. Improving program performance to overcome these shortcomings requires understanding attributes of landowners and their parcels across large scales to identify spatial and temporal enrollment patterns that drive adverse selection. In this paper, we examine these patterns in Argentina’s PES program in Chaco forest, a global deforestation hotspot. Our study area covers 252,319 km2. Results from multinomial logistic regression models showed that large parcels of enrolled land and parcels owned by absentee landowners exhibit greater evidence of spatiotemporal adverse selection than smaller parcels or parcels owned by local landowners. Furthermore, parcels managed under land use plans for conservation and restoration are more likely to be associated with adverse selection than parcels managed for financial returns such as harvest of non-timber forest products, silviculture, and silvopasture. However, prior to recommending that PES programs focus on land uses with higher potential earnings, a greater understanding is needed of the degree to which these land uses meet ecological and biodiversity goals of PES programs. We suggest that increased spatial targeting of enrollment, along with enrollment of local landowners and further incentives for land uses that support conservation and restoration, could promote long-term conservation of forest lands.
EEA Salta
Fil: Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio M. University of Arizona. Institute of the Environment and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy. Bridging Biodiversity and Conservation Science; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA; Argentina. Universidad Católica de Salta; Argentina
Fil: Hiller, Josh. Adelphi University. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Branch, Lyn C. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
Fil: Núñez Godoy, Cristina. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
Fil: Siddiqui, Sharmin. University of Florida. Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment. Environmental Engineering Sciences Department; Estados Unidos
Fil: Volante, Jose Norberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina
Fil: Soto, José R. University of Arizona. School of Natural Resources & The Environment; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Land Use Policy 95 : 104596 (June 2020)
Materia
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Pago por Servicios Ecosistémicos
Políticas
Ecosystem Services
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Policies
Argentina
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7468

id INTADig_4cbdc55cf3a867db70815df25b3909e6
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7468
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in ArgentinaNúñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.Hiller, JoshBranch, Lyn C.Núñez Godoy, CristinaSiddiqui, SharminVolante, Jose NorbertoSoto, José R.Servicios de los EcosistemasPago por Servicios EcosistémicosPolíticasEcosystem ServicesPayments for Ecosystem ServicesPoliciesArgentinaPayment for ecosystem services schemes (PES) are lauded as a market-based solution to curtail deforestation and restore degraded ecosystems. However, PES programs often fail to conserve sites under strong long-term deforestation pressures. Underperformance, in part, is likely due to adverse selection. Spatial adverse selection occurs when landowners are more likely to enroll parcels with low deforestation pressure than parcels with high deforestation pressure. Temporal adverse selection arises when parcels are enrolled for short time periods. In both cases, financial resources are allocated without having a sizeable impact on long-term land use change. Improving program performance to overcome these shortcomings requires understanding attributes of landowners and their parcels across large scales to identify spatial and temporal enrollment patterns that drive adverse selection. In this paper, we examine these patterns in Argentina’s PES program in Chaco forest, a global deforestation hotspot. Our study area covers 252,319 km2. Results from multinomial logistic regression models showed that large parcels of enrolled land and parcels owned by absentee landowners exhibit greater evidence of spatiotemporal adverse selection than smaller parcels or parcels owned by local landowners. Furthermore, parcels managed under land use plans for conservation and restoration are more likely to be associated with adverse selection than parcels managed for financial returns such as harvest of non-timber forest products, silviculture, and silvopasture. However, prior to recommending that PES programs focus on land uses with higher potential earnings, a greater understanding is needed of the degree to which these land uses meet ecological and biodiversity goals of PES programs. We suggest that increased spatial targeting of enrollment, along with enrollment of local landowners and further incentives for land uses that support conservation and restoration, could promote long-term conservation of forest lands.EEA SaltaFil: Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio M. University of Arizona. Institute of the Environment and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy. Bridging Biodiversity and Conservation Science; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA; Argentina. Universidad Católica de Salta; ArgentinaFil: Hiller, Josh. Adelphi University. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science; Estados UnidosFil: Branch, Lyn C. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados UnidosFil: Núñez Godoy, Cristina. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados UnidosFil: Siddiqui, Sharmin. University of Florida. Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment. Environmental Engineering Sciences Department; Estados UnidosFil: Volante, Jose Norberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; ArgentinaFil: Soto, José R. University of Arizona. School of Natural Resources & The Environment; Estados UnidosElsevier2020-06-24T18:04:49Z2020-06-24T18:04:49Z2020-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7468https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02648377193063370264-8377https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104596Land Use Policy 95 : 104596 (June 2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/7468instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:58.528INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
spellingShingle Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Pago por Servicios Ecosistémicos
Políticas
Ecosystem Services
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Policies
Argentina
title_short Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_full Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_fullStr Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_sort Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Hiller, Josh
Branch, Lyn C.
Núñez Godoy, Cristina
Siddiqui, Sharmin
Volante, Jose Norberto
Soto, José R.
author Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
author_facet Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Hiller, Josh
Branch, Lyn C.
Núñez Godoy, Cristina
Siddiqui, Sharmin
Volante, Jose Norberto
Soto, José R.
author_role author
author2 Hiller, Josh
Branch, Lyn C.
Núñez Godoy, Cristina
Siddiqui, Sharmin
Volante, Jose Norberto
Soto, José R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Pago por Servicios Ecosistémicos
Políticas
Ecosystem Services
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Policies
Argentina
topic Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Pago por Servicios Ecosistémicos
Políticas
Ecosystem Services
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Policies
Argentina
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Payment for ecosystem services schemes (PES) are lauded as a market-based solution to curtail deforestation and restore degraded ecosystems. However, PES programs often fail to conserve sites under strong long-term deforestation pressures. Underperformance, in part, is likely due to adverse selection. Spatial adverse selection occurs when landowners are more likely to enroll parcels with low deforestation pressure than parcels with high deforestation pressure. Temporal adverse selection arises when parcels are enrolled for short time periods. In both cases, financial resources are allocated without having a sizeable impact on long-term land use change. Improving program performance to overcome these shortcomings requires understanding attributes of landowners and their parcels across large scales to identify spatial and temporal enrollment patterns that drive adverse selection. In this paper, we examine these patterns in Argentina’s PES program in Chaco forest, a global deforestation hotspot. Our study area covers 252,319 km2. Results from multinomial logistic regression models showed that large parcels of enrolled land and parcels owned by absentee landowners exhibit greater evidence of spatiotemporal adverse selection than smaller parcels or parcels owned by local landowners. Furthermore, parcels managed under land use plans for conservation and restoration are more likely to be associated with adverse selection than parcels managed for financial returns such as harvest of non-timber forest products, silviculture, and silvopasture. However, prior to recommending that PES programs focus on land uses with higher potential earnings, a greater understanding is needed of the degree to which these land uses meet ecological and biodiversity goals of PES programs. We suggest that increased spatial targeting of enrollment, along with enrollment of local landowners and further incentives for land uses that support conservation and restoration, could promote long-term conservation of forest lands.
EEA Salta
Fil: Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio M. University of Arizona. Institute of the Environment and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy. Bridging Biodiversity and Conservation Science; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA; Argentina. Universidad Católica de Salta; Argentina
Fil: Hiller, Josh. Adelphi University. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Branch, Lyn C. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
Fil: Núñez Godoy, Cristina. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
Fil: Siddiqui, Sharmin. University of Florida. Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment. Environmental Engineering Sciences Department; Estados Unidos
Fil: Volante, Jose Norberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina
Fil: Soto, José R. University of Arizona. School of Natural Resources & The Environment; Estados Unidos
description Payment for ecosystem services schemes (PES) are lauded as a market-based solution to curtail deforestation and restore degraded ecosystems. However, PES programs often fail to conserve sites under strong long-term deforestation pressures. Underperformance, in part, is likely due to adverse selection. Spatial adverse selection occurs when landowners are more likely to enroll parcels with low deforestation pressure than parcels with high deforestation pressure. Temporal adverse selection arises when parcels are enrolled for short time periods. In both cases, financial resources are allocated without having a sizeable impact on long-term land use change. Improving program performance to overcome these shortcomings requires understanding attributes of landowners and their parcels across large scales to identify spatial and temporal enrollment patterns that drive adverse selection. In this paper, we examine these patterns in Argentina’s PES program in Chaco forest, a global deforestation hotspot. Our study area covers 252,319 km2. Results from multinomial logistic regression models showed that large parcels of enrolled land and parcels owned by absentee landowners exhibit greater evidence of spatiotemporal adverse selection than smaller parcels or parcels owned by local landowners. Furthermore, parcels managed under land use plans for conservation and restoration are more likely to be associated with adverse selection than parcels managed for financial returns such as harvest of non-timber forest products, silviculture, and silvopasture. However, prior to recommending that PES programs focus on land uses with higher potential earnings, a greater understanding is needed of the degree to which these land uses meet ecological and biodiversity goals of PES programs. We suggest that increased spatial targeting of enrollment, along with enrollment of local landowners and further incentives for land uses that support conservation and restoration, could promote long-term conservation of forest lands.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-24T18:04:49Z
2020-06-24T18:04:49Z
2020-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7468
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837719306337
0264-8377
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104596
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7468
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837719306337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104596
identifier_str_mv 0264-8377
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Land Use Policy 95 : 104596 (June 2020)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619145248768000
score 12.559606