Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice

Autores
Saarikoski, Heli; Primmer, Eeva; Saarela, Sanna-Riikka; Antunes, Paula; Baró, Francesc; Berry, Pam; Garcia Blanko, Gemma; Gómez-Baggethun, Erik; Carvalho, Lawrence; Dick, Jan; Dunford, Robert; Hanzu, Mihail; Harrison, Paula A.; Izakovicova, Zita; Kertész, Miklós; Kopperoinen, Leena; Köhler, Berit; Langemeyer, Johannes; Lapola, David; Liquete, Camino; Luque, Sandra; Mederly, Peter; Niemelä, Jari; Palomo, Ignacio; Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José; Peri, Pablo Luis; Preda, Elena; Priess, Jörg A.; Santos, Rui Ferreira Dos; Schleyer, Christian; Turkelboom, Francis; Vadineanu, Angheluta; Verheyden, Wim; Vikström, Suvi; Young, Juliette; Aszalós, Réka
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Saarikoski, Heli. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Primmer, Eeva. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Saarela, Sanna-Riikka. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Antunes, Paula. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research; Portugal
Fil: Baró, Francesc. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute; España
Fil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Garcia Blanko, Gemma. Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation. Energy and Environment Division. Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia; España
Fil: Gómez-Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Department of International Environment and Development Studies; Noruega. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA); Noruega
Fil: Carvalho, Lawrence. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Dick, Jan. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Dunford, Robert. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña. Lancaster Environment Centre. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Hanzu, Mihail. Romanian National Institute for Research and Development in Silviculture; Rumania
Fil: Harrison, Paula A. Lancaster Environment Centre. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Izakovicova, Zita. Slovak Academy of Science. Institute of Landscape Ecology; Eslovaquia
Fil: Kertész, Miklós. Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Centre for Ecological Research. Institute of Ecology and Botany; Hungría
Fil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Köhler, Berit. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA); Noruega
Fil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute. Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability; España
Fil: Lapola, David. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Center for Meteorological and Climatic Studies Applied to Agriculture (CEPAGRI); Brasil
Fil: Liquete, Camino. Joint Research Centre (JRC). European Commission; Italia
Fil: Luque, Sandra. National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia
Fil: Mederly, Peter. Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Eslovaquia
Fil: Niemelä, Jari. University of Helsinki. Department of Environmental Sciences; Finlandia
Fil: Palomo, Ignacio. University of the Basque Country. Basque Centre for Climate Change; España.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Argentina
Fil: Preda, Elena. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania
Fil: Priess, Joerg A. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; Alemania
Fil: Santos, Rui Ferreira Dos. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research; Portugal
Fil: Schleyer, Christian. Alpen-Adria-University Klagenfurt. Institute of Social Ecology; Austria. University of Kassel. Section of International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance; Alemania
Fil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania
Fil: Verheyden, Wim. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vikström, Suvi. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Young, Juliette. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Aszalós, Réka. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría
Fuente
Ecosystem Services 29, Part C : 579-598 (February 2018)
Materia
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Agroecosistemas
Instituciones de Investigación
Ecosystem Services
Agroecosystems
Research Institutions
Servicios Ecosistémicos
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6590

id INTADig_2a38f0fa2b33a686ef41fca1c8ce6aa3
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6590
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practiceSaarikoski, HeliPrimmer, EevaSaarela, Sanna-RiikkaAntunes, PaulaBaró, FrancescBerry, PamGarcia Blanko, GemmaGómez-Baggethun, ErikCarvalho, LawrenceDick, JanDunford, RobertHanzu, MihailHarrison, Paula A.Izakovicova, ZitaKertész, MiklósKopperoinen, LeenaKöhler, BeritLangemeyer, JohannesLapola, DavidLiquete, CaminoLuque, SandraMederly, PeterNiemelä, JariPalomo, IgnacioMartinez Pastur, Guillermo JoséPeri, Pablo LuisPreda, ElenaPriess, Jörg A.Santos, Rui Ferreira DosSchleyer, ChristianTurkelboom, FrancisVadineanu, AnghelutaVerheyden, WimVikström, SuviYoung, JulietteAszalós, RékaServicios de los EcosistemasAgroecosistemasInstituciones de InvestigaciónEcosystem ServicesAgroecosystemsResearch InstitutionsServicios EcosistémicosThe promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.EEA Santa CruzFil: Saarikoski, Heli. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Primmer, Eeva. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Saarela, Sanna-Riikka. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Antunes, Paula. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research; PortugalFil: Baró, Francesc. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute; EspañaFil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran BretañaFil: Garcia Blanko, Gemma. Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation. Energy and Environment Division. Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia; EspañaFil: Gómez-Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Department of International Environment and Development Studies; Noruega. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA); NoruegaFil: Carvalho, Lawrence. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran BretañaFil: Dick, Jan. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran BretañaFil: Dunford, Robert. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña. Lancaster Environment Centre. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran BretañaFil: Hanzu, Mihail. Romanian National Institute for Research and Development in Silviculture; RumaniaFil: Harrison, Paula A. Lancaster Environment Centre. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran BretañaFil: Izakovicova, Zita. Slovak Academy of Science. Institute of Landscape Ecology; EslovaquiaFil: Kertész, Miklós. Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Centre for Ecological Research. Institute of Ecology and Botany; HungríaFil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Köhler, Berit. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA); NoruegaFil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute. Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability; EspañaFil: Lapola, David. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Center for Meteorological and Climatic Studies Applied to Agriculture (CEPAGRI); BrasilFil: Liquete, Camino. Joint Research Centre (JRC). European Commission; ItaliaFil: Luque, Sandra. National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; FranciaFil: Mederly, Peter. Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences; EslovaquiaFil: Niemelä, Jari. University of Helsinki. Department of Environmental Sciences; FinlandiaFil: Palomo, Ignacio. University of the Basque Country. Basque Centre for Climate Change; España.Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; ArgentinaFil: Preda, Elena. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; RumaniaFil: Priess, Joerg A. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; AlemaniaFil: Santos, Rui Ferreira Dos. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research; PortugalFil: Schleyer, Christian. Alpen-Adria-University Klagenfurt. Institute of Social Ecology; Austria. University of Kassel. Section of International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance; AlemaniaFil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; BélgicaFil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; RumaniaFil: Verheyden, Wim. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; BélgicaFil: Vikström, Suvi. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Young, Juliette. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran BretañaFil: Aszalós, Réka. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; HungríaElsevier2019-12-30T12:22:00Z2019-12-30T12:22:00Z2018-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300141http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/65902212-0416https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019Ecosystem Services 29, Part C : 579-598 (February 2018)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:48:18Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/6590instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:48:19.26INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
spellingShingle Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
Saarikoski, Heli
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Agroecosistemas
Instituciones de Investigación
Ecosystem Services
Agroecosystems
Research Institutions
Servicios Ecosistémicos
title_short Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_full Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_fullStr Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_full_unstemmed Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_sort Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Saarikoski, Heli
Primmer, Eeva
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
Antunes, Paula
Baró, Francesc
Berry, Pam
Garcia Blanko, Gemma
Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
Carvalho, Lawrence
Dick, Jan
Dunford, Robert
Hanzu, Mihail
Harrison, Paula A.
Izakovicova, Zita
Kertész, Miklós
Kopperoinen, Leena
Köhler, Berit
Langemeyer, Johannes
Lapola, David
Liquete, Camino
Luque, Sandra
Mederly, Peter
Niemelä, Jari
Palomo, Ignacio
Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Preda, Elena
Priess, Jörg A.
Santos, Rui Ferreira Dos
Schleyer, Christian
Turkelboom, Francis
Vadineanu, Angheluta
Verheyden, Wim
Vikström, Suvi
Young, Juliette
Aszalós, Réka
author Saarikoski, Heli
author_facet Saarikoski, Heli
Primmer, Eeva
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
Antunes, Paula
Baró, Francesc
Berry, Pam
Garcia Blanko, Gemma
Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
Carvalho, Lawrence
Dick, Jan
Dunford, Robert
Hanzu, Mihail
Harrison, Paula A.
Izakovicova, Zita
Kertész, Miklós
Kopperoinen, Leena
Köhler, Berit
Langemeyer, Johannes
Lapola, David
Liquete, Camino
Luque, Sandra
Mederly, Peter
Niemelä, Jari
Palomo, Ignacio
Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Preda, Elena
Priess, Jörg A.
Santos, Rui Ferreira Dos
Schleyer, Christian
Turkelboom, Francis
Vadineanu, Angheluta
Verheyden, Wim
Vikström, Suvi
Young, Juliette
Aszalós, Réka
author_role author
author2 Primmer, Eeva
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
Antunes, Paula
Baró, Francesc
Berry, Pam
Garcia Blanko, Gemma
Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
Carvalho, Lawrence
Dick, Jan
Dunford, Robert
Hanzu, Mihail
Harrison, Paula A.
Izakovicova, Zita
Kertész, Miklós
Kopperoinen, Leena
Köhler, Berit
Langemeyer, Johannes
Lapola, David
Liquete, Camino
Luque, Sandra
Mederly, Peter
Niemelä, Jari
Palomo, Ignacio
Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Preda, Elena
Priess, Jörg A.
Santos, Rui Ferreira Dos
Schleyer, Christian
Turkelboom, Francis
Vadineanu, Angheluta
Verheyden, Wim
Vikström, Suvi
Young, Juliette
Aszalós, Réka
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Agroecosistemas
Instituciones de Investigación
Ecosystem Services
Agroecosystems
Research Institutions
Servicios Ecosistémicos
topic Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Agroecosistemas
Instituciones de Investigación
Ecosystem Services
Agroecosystems
Research Institutions
Servicios Ecosistémicos
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Saarikoski, Heli. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Primmer, Eeva. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Saarela, Sanna-Riikka. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Antunes, Paula. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research; Portugal
Fil: Baró, Francesc. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute; España
Fil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Garcia Blanko, Gemma. Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation. Energy and Environment Division. Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia; España
Fil: Gómez-Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Department of International Environment and Development Studies; Noruega. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA); Noruega
Fil: Carvalho, Lawrence. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Dick, Jan. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Dunford, Robert. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña. Lancaster Environment Centre. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Hanzu, Mihail. Romanian National Institute for Research and Development in Silviculture; Rumania
Fil: Harrison, Paula A. Lancaster Environment Centre. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Izakovicova, Zita. Slovak Academy of Science. Institute of Landscape Ecology; Eslovaquia
Fil: Kertész, Miklós. Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Centre for Ecological Research. Institute of Ecology and Botany; Hungría
Fil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Köhler, Berit. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA); Noruega
Fil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute. Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability; España
Fil: Lapola, David. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Center for Meteorological and Climatic Studies Applied to Agriculture (CEPAGRI); Brasil
Fil: Liquete, Camino. Joint Research Centre (JRC). European Commission; Italia
Fil: Luque, Sandra. National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia
Fil: Mederly, Peter. Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Eslovaquia
Fil: Niemelä, Jari. University of Helsinki. Department of Environmental Sciences; Finlandia
Fil: Palomo, Ignacio. University of the Basque Country. Basque Centre for Climate Change; España.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Argentina
Fil: Preda, Elena. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania
Fil: Priess, Joerg A. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; Alemania
Fil: Santos, Rui Ferreira Dos. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research; Portugal
Fil: Schleyer, Christian. Alpen-Adria-University Klagenfurt. Institute of Social Ecology; Austria. University of Kassel. Section of International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance; Alemania
Fil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania
Fil: Verheyden, Wim. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vikström, Suvi. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Young, Juliette. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Aszalós, Réka. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría
description The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02
2019-12-30T12:22:00Z
2019-12-30T12:22:00Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300141
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6590
2212-0416
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300141
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6590
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019
identifier_str_mv 2212-0416
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ecosystem Services 29, Part C : 579-598 (February 2018)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341375298764800
score 12.623145